• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Team-Z Setup in 1990 Mustang GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter vristang
  • Start date Start date Apr 10, 2022

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 10, 2022
#1
  • Apr 10, 2022
  • #1
I'm getting frustrated, so this is my 'phone a friend'...

The car is a 1990 GT, originally 5.0, with a t5.
Around 2000, I converted to 5lug Cobra brakes, using (as best I can recall)...
95 Mustang spindle, 95 Mustang control arms, 13" rotors, dual piston Cobra caliper, and the rear end was swapped from a 95 Mustang, complete with brakes.

The car has not run since around 2006. I am currently in the process of installing a 2.3n/a for commuting.
During this conversion I planned to install parts I had laying around from years back, when I was running a 351w/408 in the same car. Specifically...
Team-Z K-Member, Control Arms, and Strange Coil overs.
I bought these parts before Feb 2010. Can't find an invoice, so not sure who I bought them from.

I put things together, and all seemed to go fairly well, until the wheels went on. They are located approximately 1" too far forward, causing a clearance issue between the tire and the wheel well.
With stock k-member and 95 control arms, this was not an issue, as the car ran for several years with that setup.

So, I reached out to Team-Z. They were helpful, looked at a bunch of pics, but could not identify my control arms. The ones I have look different than theirs. Maybe I don't have their control arms, so I bought a set of their Autocross control arms.
Installed the new Autocross control arms yesterday, and same thing. Wheel is offset forward by an inch.
So, I have an autocross control arm, and a mystery control arm... more on this later...

I took a bunch of pics of the K-member, and what I have looks identical to the pics I've found on the interwebs, of the Team-Z Kmember...
But best I can figure is that the k-member is moving my control arms/spindle forward an inch, but I don't see anywhere on the K-member that suggests this?
The only relevant parts that have changed are the factory Fox K-member and 95 ctrl arm, replaced with TeamZ k-member and ctrl arm...

Also...
There seems to be a 1/8" difference in the rear mounting point of the autocross control arm compared to the mystery control arm.
Attaching pics to illustrate this issue...

I'll send my new pics to Team-Z on Monday, but wanted to ask you guys.
Most issues I run into, come down to me overlooking something simple, so maybe you guys can catch it, then point and laugh at me?


 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Apr 10, 2022
#2
  • Apr 10, 2022
  • #2
Autocross arms should be moved forward to increase caster and cause better handling. Later year factpry control arms also move the wheel forward. The 91+ fox mustangs have a larger wheel opening. They extended the opening forward. Looks like you need a standard position mustang control arm.

The position of the tire may also look off just because the weight isn't on the wheels.
 

Flatfoot

5 Year Member
Aug 18, 2017
73
96
38
Milton, Fl
Apr 11, 2022
#3
  • Apr 11, 2022
  • #3
Seems like I read in @TOOLOW91 's build thread he ran into the same thing and had to get different control arms. Maybe he'll chime in.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,484
8,695
234
S.I.NY
Apr 13, 2022
#4
  • Apr 13, 2022
  • #4
Flatfoot said:
Seems like I read in @TOOLOW91 's build thread he ran into the same thing and had to get different control arms. Maybe he'll chime in.
Click to expand...
I run all UPR stuff . I needed the reverse offset arms they make . I don’t know any other company beside team z that does all their parts in silver vein . So it’s weird they don’t know if it’s theirs or not .
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Apr 13, 2022
#5
  • Apr 13, 2022
  • #5
I just re-read your issue in this thread. It's weird that it worked before and now has the wheels pushed too far forward.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 14, 2022
#6
  • Apr 14, 2022
  • #6
Finally getting back to the thread.
Yes, it is odd that everything fit just fine, then swapping the K-member and control arms moved the wheels

The pics of my k-member seem to match pics I've found online of Team-Z k-members. I can't see where its different, if it is?

Got a response from Team-Z. They have NEVER built a k-member that moved the wheel/control arm forward. They are still using the original jig...
Been digging like crazy, but can't figure out who I bought this stuff from. In spite of the Team-Z sticker, I'm thinking it may all be counterfeit.
Also, the Team-Z autocross control arms don't move the wheel forward. The geometry is the same as the fox control arm.

At this point, all I can do is move forward.
Tonight I will start pulling the Mystery k-member. Hopefully I can lay it next to the factory 1990 k-member and see a difference...

I certainly don't want to buy any more parts until I know what the issue is.

TOOLOW91 said:
I don’t know any other company beside team z that does all their parts in silver vein . So it’s weird they don’t know if it’s theirs or not .
Click to expand...
Are you talking about their 'hammer tone' finish?
None of the original parts I purchased 15yrs ago had the hammertone, those are black, but they may have not been using that paint back then?
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,484
8,695
234
S.I.NY
Apr 14, 2022
#7
  • Apr 14, 2022
  • #7
vristang said:
Finally getting back to the thread.
Yes, it is odd that everything fit just fine, then swapping the K-member and control arms moved the wheels

The pics of my k-member seem to match pics I've found online of Team-Z k-members. I can't see where its different, if it is?

Got a response from Team-Z. They have NEVER built a k-member that moved the wheel/control arm forward. They are still using the original jig...
Been digging like crazy, but can't figure out who I bought this stuff from. In spite of the Team-Z sticker, I'm thinking it may all be counterfeit.
Also, the Team-Z autocross control arms don't move the wheel forward. The geometry is the same as the fox control arm.

At this point, all I can do is move forward.
Tonight I will start pulling the Mystery k-member. Hopefully I can lay it next to the factory 1990 k-member and see a difference...

I certainly don't want to buy any more parts until I know what the issue is.


Are you talking about their 'hammer tone' finish?
None of the original parts I purchased 15yrs ago had the hammertone, those are black, but they may have not been using that paint back then?
Click to expand...
It isn’t paint they are using . It’s Powdercoat. They call it silver vein , it does have a hammer tone finish . Doesn’t mean someone else couldn’t have coated them . I doubt it though
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 15, 2022
#8
  • Apr 15, 2022
  • #8
Regardless, the parts that I question the origin of, are all a black semi-gloss finish. I had them in 2007, but can't confirm who I purchased from. I have a suspicion, but don't want to spit out any names unless I can confirm...

Didn't get it pulled apart last night, will get it done today though...
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Apr 15, 2022
#9
  • Apr 15, 2022
  • #9
SR performance uses silver vein hammer tone, also.

You could get adjustable lower control arms and get almost infinite alignment adjustment with the CC plates, coil overs, and bump steer kit. Suspension geometry can be tricky though. Moving the wheels forward isn't a bad thing. You will probably need to put turn buckles and brackets behind the fender to bow it out a little for clearance and trim the gt molding extension inside wheel well. Doesn't seem like you're interested in doing all that though.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 15, 2022
#10
  • Apr 15, 2022
  • #10
90sickfox said:
Doesn't seem like you're interested in doing all that though.
Click to expand...
LOL, nope... especially for a car I plan on driving daily (110+ miles), in stop and go traffic, on crappy Seattle streets/I-5.
The adjustable units don't have poly bushings...

I do appreciate the input though!
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 18, 2022
#11
  • Apr 18, 2022
  • #11
I’m at a loss.

I pulled the TeamZ kmember, put in the stock kmember, 95 ctrl arms, and wheels are back to proper position…

I used the factory kmember to locate some wood blocks, kind of as a jig. Nothing precise.
Then dropped the TeamZ kmember into the jig.
As can be seen in the pics, there are some differences, but nothing that looks like the 1.0” that I’m looking for.
I was able to confirm the TeamZ kmember drops the engine 3/4”.

I did similar with the control arms, although that is a little sketchier setup…. But still, I don’t see a difference of an inch anywhere.

Maybe you guys will see something I missed?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 18, 2022
#12
  • Apr 18, 2022
  • #12
A couple more pics…

The last one is final mock-up without brakes, but it’s pretty clear the wheel is properly positioned again.

I guess it’s just tolerance stack up?

 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,467
2,901
173
Florida
Apr 18, 2022
#13
  • Apr 18, 2022
  • #13
vristang said:
LOL, nope... especially for a car I plan on driving daily (110+ miles), in stop and go traffic, on crappy Seattle streets/I-5.
Click to expand...
Seattle? Watch out for the DWO's
 
G

GOvert

15 Year Member
Jan 27, 2007
490
100
63
north central Tennessee Valley
Apr 18, 2022
#14
  • Apr 18, 2022
  • #14
I have an ignorant question since I'm not well versed in Foxbody geometry. Are left-hand LCAs and Right-hand LCAs different?
 

bird_dog0347

still married haven't seen testicles in years
15 Year Member
Jun 7, 2012
2,301
2,036
174
Little Elm, TX
Apr 19, 2022
#15
  • Apr 19, 2022
  • #15
GOvert said:
I have an ignorant question since I'm not well versed in Foxbody geometry. Are left-hand LCAs and Right-hand LCAs different?
Click to expand...
Yes, due to the bracket for the sway bar end links.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Front wheels not centered in wheel well
  • Kpollard
  • May 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
441
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 3, 2025
AeroCoupe
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
588
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
419
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
G
2001 Mustang GT noise after header and control arm (x2) install
  • gilmo5
  • Jan 8, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
300
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 12, 2025
weendoggy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?