• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

test & tune times

  • Thread starter Thread starter myslo50
  • Start date Start date Oct 3, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Oct 3, 2007
#1
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #1
i just went tonight, thease times were horrible, i know there is more in my car

first pass launch at 5k rpm
reaction- .2261
60 ft- 2.5357
330 ft- 6.5747
1/8 et- 9.7658
1/8 mph- 78.13
1000' et- 12.4820
1000' mph- 90.13
1/4 et- 14.7640
1/4 mph- 99.09

i spun hardcore off the line, hit second and bogged down bad. miss no gears

second pass launch at 3k rpm
reaction- .1778
60ft- 2.2551
330ft- 6.1330
1/8 et- 9.3671
1/8 mph- 77.47
1000' et- 12.1972
1000 mph- 85.69
1/4 et- 14.5632
1/4 mph- 96.15

on that pass i missed third & fourth gear. i have mm lca's, adj pinion snubber, and bfg dr's, and four cyl springs with no front sway bar....wtf!!!!
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Oct 3, 2007
#2
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #2
Sitty foot time..a tenth off the 60' is worth 2 tenths on the ET.
 

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Oct 3, 2007
#3
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #3
i cant find a happy medium, if i launch too high ill spin, if i launch too low ill bogg..i dunno
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Oct 3, 2007
#4
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #4
ET Streets, mang.
 

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Oct 3, 2007
#5
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #5
i spent 150 per tire on the bfg's, im all spent for now. i dont understand how people can get 1.6-1.9 60ft. i think i need more motor.
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Oct 3, 2007
#6
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #6
When I had my Mustang, my first ever time at a drag strip I pulled a 1.9 60', on a stock motor that wasn't too happy and 275/50R15 ET Streets. My ET was almost 0.4 seconds faster, and 7 mph slower. ET is all in the first 330 feet. After that it's just MPH.

I'm begining to notice a pattern here..why can nobody afford $300 for a pair of ET Streets?
 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
Oct 3, 2007
#7
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #7
no moneys meng lol
 

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Oct 3, 2007
#8
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #8
I'm begining to notice a pattern here..why can nobody afford $300 for a pair of ET Streets?

i allready bought d/r ill wait till there gone then ill look into m/t et streets..i like thoes better
 

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Oct 3, 2007
#9
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #9
heres the thing......stock weight of an 88 gt. with the exception of a/c and a/p and sway bar removed. i had a full tank of gas and my 280lb fat ass. nothin else has been removed.
with the 4cyl springs in, the front sits way too low. my front tires sit in the fender wells in the front. so the transfer is not there like i wanted. i dunno ill figure somehting out
 

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
Oct 3, 2007
#10
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #10
I have et streets and i hooks at 4,000 rpms on the launch i get 1.70's 1.80's 1.90's all day.Does your track use traction compound on tune and test days.maybe you had too much air pressure in the bfgs.more track time will help the times alot.what mods do you have as stock runs about 15.50 or so in the 1/4


get v8 springs i have them
 

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Oct 3, 2007
#11
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #11
i was at milan dragway in michigan, i dont know if they used compound. my mods were in my sig. nothing too special, i just thought there was more in her. i was hoping for 14. flat i think i had like 25 or 30spi in the tires. i didnt have a guage on me or i would of dropped the pressure. there a 275/40/17 dr if it makes a differencs, which i think it does
 
C

cjnecessary

Member
Mar 13, 2006
70
0
6
richmond,in
Oct 3, 2007
#12
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #12
I run about 10 to 12 lbs in my bfg d/r. Maybe you had to much a/p.
 

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
Oct 3, 2007
#13
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #13
It should be faster i think high 13 sec. 15-20psi would be better you need to practice the takeoffs. i have 26x10.50x15" et streets on turbines the extra sidewall in the tires helps them grip
 
8

88blacklx

Banned
Jul 2, 2007
13
0
0
Oct 3, 2007
#14
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #14
on an untouched 88gt with the exception of 3.73's and flowmaster mufflers and a
k&N filter i went 13.8 on et streets with sway bar removed . Thats pretty much it, no launch as i feared breaking something. So i probably would have went a little faster had i left the line with some rpm. basically the slicks stopped the spinning after i took off and on the 1-2 shift. I was cutting 1.8 60's. So your setup with ported heads and everything else you have, i would expect the same as my time or better. I was running through stock headers and catted H too. Although i could have had one of those freak speed density cars. who knows

also the car ran 14.2 on bf goodrich ta radials(street tires, not drag radials) and i was cutting 2.0-2.1 60's
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Oct 3, 2007
#15
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #15
88blacklx said:
on an untouched 88gt with the exception of 3.73's and flowmaster mufflers and a
k&N filter i went 13.8 on et streets with sway bar removed . Thats pretty much it, no launch as i feared breaking something. So i probably would have went a little faster had i left the line with some rpm. basically the slicks stopped the spinning after i took off and on the 1-2 shift. I was cutting 1.8 60's. So your setup with ported heads and everything else you have, i would expect the same as my time or better. I was running through stock headers and catted H too. Although i could have had one of those freak speed density cars. who knows

also the car ran 14.2 on bf goodrich ta radials(street tires, not drag radials) and i was cutting 2.0-2.1 60's
Click to expand...

yeah i'd expect faster too. when all i had was 4.10's, 2.5" o/r H pipe and spintech mufflers, i cut a 13.7@99mph with a (iirc) 2.0 short time on nitto's. i haven't run my car since the rebuild and other bolt ons so i don't know what it'll run now. definitely pulls harder though.
 
M

mike93lx

Member
May 22, 2003
391
0
16
Hudson, MA
Oct 3, 2007
#16
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #16
beyond what everyone here has said, the only advice I can give you is to not focus on the lights and your reaction time. it doesn't affect your e/t and it usually gets new drivers anxious and messes up launches.
 

93GTosu

Member
May 5, 2005
183
0
19
Oct 4, 2007
#17
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #17
mike93lx said:
beyond what everyone here has said, the only advice I can give you is to not focus on the lights and your reaction time. it doesn't affect your e/t and it usually gets new drivers anxious and messes up launches.
Click to expand...

with that 1.778 r/t i think its safe to say he's not even paying attention to the tree. jk jk


It looks like lowering your launch rpms helped quite a bit. but also, you can't really expect much when you miss TWO of the four gears from a run! thats leaving quite a bit on the table imo.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Oct 4, 2007
#18
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #18
93GTosu said:
with that 1.778 r/t i think its safe to say he's not even paying attention to the tree. jk jk


It looks like lowering your launch rpms helped quite a bit. but also, you can't really expect much when you miss TWO of the four gears from a run! thats leaving quite a bit on the table imo.
Click to expand...

i didn't even see him say he missed 2 gears! yeah man, practice hitting all the gears and then go do it again. missing 2 gears would EASILY shave half a second. probably even more depending on how fast you got it to go in each time!
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Oct 4, 2007
#19
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #19
Don't just drop the hammer, your going to have to ride the clutch out of the hole some for it to hook well on DRs.

Take it from someone running consistent 1.93-1.96 60's on 18" Street tires, a little spin is alright to keep the power up, but your going to have to be a little less anxious on just dumping the clutch.

Also the 1 tenth in the 60' is 2 up top is a decent way, but in NO way a garentee. To think his 14.7 would be a 13.1 with a 1.7 60' (at 99 mph) would most likely not happen. Too many variables.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 4, 2007
#20
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #20
Yup i agree with 25th. Those sixty foots will only come down with some clutch finesse. You cant just dump and go. Even on street tires i still launch from 3k rpm...just slip the clutch and control the wheelspin.

Generally you wont be able to get to WOT right away. You need to control wheelspin first then get into it for the last little bit to get the CAR moving before hitting second gear.

You need to drop that tire pressure to 15 psi and do a healthy 2nd gear burnout. Get em hot and then launch that sucker someplace in between 4k and 5k.

And last but not least...in a race where you are only making 3 shifts...you just cant be missing 2 of them. Thats an easy .5 sec depending on how quickly you recovered. I think high 13's are definitely possible with this combo.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

First gear is too tall. Should I make it taller? Nitrous guys, help!
  • FastDriver
  • Dec 30, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 31, 2023
AeroCoupe
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
C
experienced engine builders chime in
  • Cclaro
  • Oct 4, 2021
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
55
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Oct 16, 2021
Shawn_Mc
S
C
New turbo slower times
  • Clarence Saxon
  • Jul 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 30, 2019
General karthief
Exhaust Headers - Myths and Secrets...
  • geoklass
  • Jun 20, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2021
WhiteCobra95
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?