• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

The 5-lug swap has begun!

  • Thread starter Thread starter spook
  • Start date Start date Jul 23, 2004
S

spook

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
84
0
0
Jul 23, 2004
#1
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #1
Well I came home today for the weekend and much to my surprise, my car was jacked up in the air with an 8.8 rear end sitting next to it!! Thanks, dad! So I guess my 5-lug swap will be commencing today. Here are the details:

8.8 rear end out of a 2000 Mustang GT
4.10 gears (added at a later date, probably when we do the motor swap)
'96 Cobra rims with some good tires (I don't remember what)
disc brakes off a 2000 Mustang GT

Right now for simplicity's sake we're using mostly 2000 Mustang GT components, but when it comes time for new pads I'll be getting some Hawks hopefully. I have some pics that I'll probably post Monday or so.

Also, there's a good chance both my car and the Cobra will be done by August 7th, so hopefully we can bring one or both.



 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Jul 23, 2004
#2
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #2
Rear end only at this time or both front and rear swap?

I guess I missed the parts line for the front.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Jul 23, 2004
#3
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #3
Hate to burst your bubble, buy your rear end is gonna be way too wide.

The 94-98 rear ends push the wheels out 0.75" each side and the 99-04 rears are about 1 inch wider than that each side. You are gonna be gaining about 2-3" of rear track out back.

The 2000 spindles will also puch the fronts out 8mm each side, but that's tolerable. But the rear wheel track will be noticably wider than the front.
 

Cougar

Founding Member
Sep 29, 2001
913
0
0
Manhattan Kansas, KSU
Jul 23, 2004
#4
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #4
Sweet, i haven't seen your car before. When are you putting the turbo motor in?
 
S

spook

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
84
0
0
Jul 24, 2004
#5
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #5
Well I didn't bother listing spindles,etc. This weekend we're aiming to do the rear, then next weekend the brakes and front.

As for the rear end being too wide, well I guess we'll just see how it looks when we get it under there. Since my current wheels each sit in the wheel well a good inch or two, I was under the impression that I had some room to work with. Thanks for the heads up. So are you saying it won't work at all, or just has the potential to look weird? Because I think the wide rear end look is muscular and pretty nice.

Hey Cougar. I probably won't get into the turbo swap for a while. With school full time I don't have a job, and I won't be able to afford to get it in for months. Right now we're still saving and gathering parts.
 

Cougar

Founding Member
Sep 29, 2001
913
0
0
Manhattan Kansas, KSU
Jul 24, 2004
#6
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #6
spook said:
Hey Cougar. I probably won't get into the turbo swap for a while. With school full time I don't have a job, and I won't be able to afford to get it in for months. Right now we're still saving and gathering parts.
Click to expand...
Yeah, i know how that goes, i'm in the same boat
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Jul 24, 2004
#7
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #7
spook said:
As for the rear end being too wide, well I guess we'll just see how it looks when we get it under there. Since my current wheels each sit in the wheel well a good inch or two, I was under the impression that I had some room to work with. Thanks for the heads up. So are you saying it won't work at all, or just has the potential to look weird? Because I think the wide rear end look is muscular and pretty nice.
Click to expand...

Oh it will bolt up fine and physically work. Just a little heads up that it may look odd and/or you could have serious rubbing issues.

The 8.8 housing in 1999 was physically widened almost an inch on each side. Add to that the fact that SN95 disks add 0.75" to the width over a drum brake 8.8 rear.

Oh and FYI in case you didn't know, that rear would have 3.27's in it.
 

Cougar

Founding Member
Sep 29, 2001
913
0
0
Manhattan Kansas, KSU
Jul 24, 2004
#8
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #8
Mustang5L5 said:
Oh it will bolt up fine and physically work. Just a little heads up that it may look odd and/or you could have serious rubbing issues.

The 8.8 housing in 1999 was physically widened almost an inch on each side. Add to that the fact that SN95 disks add 0.75" to the width over a drum brake 8.8 rear.

Oh and FYI in case you didn't know, that rear would have 3.27's in it.
Click to expand...
Since it's a live axle, he should be able to run more offset wheels to compensate for that without too much of a negative effect on the geometry.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Jul 24, 2004
#9
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #9
Cougar said:
Since it's a live axle, he should be able to run more offset wheels to compensate for that without too much of a negative effect on the geometry.
Click to expand...

True, but he's running '96 Cobras.

I have the same wheels and when i ran an SVO/Mark 7 rear disk setup out back, the edges of the wheel used to hit my fender lips as the wheel was pushed out pretty far. I since modified the offset so that they would be drawn inward more.

The axle will work with the right wheels. In the futue he might need to pick up some rear wheels with a deeper offset in the rear so it pulls the wheel back in somewhat.
 
S

spook

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
84
0
0
Jul 24, 2004
#10
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #10
Mustang5L5 said:
True, but he's running '96 Cobras.

I have the same wheels and when i ran an SVO/Mark 7 rear disk setup out back, the edges of the wheel used to hit my fender lips as the wheel was pushed out pretty far. I since modified the offset so that they would be drawn inward more.

The axle will work with the right wheels. In the futue he might need to pick up some rear wheels with a deeper offset in the rear so it pulls the wheel back in somewhat.
Click to expand...

Well is your car stock height? And the rims still rubbed? How did you end up fixing the problem? Does it depend any on what tires I plan on using? You're kind of scaring me here.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Jul 24, 2004
#11
  • Jul 24, 2004
  • #11
spook said:
Well is your car stock height? And the rims still rubbed? How did you end up fixing the problem? Does it depend any on what tires I plan on using? You're kind of scaring me here.
Click to expand...


Didn't mean to scare you, just trying to give you a heads up.

My car is lowered with FMS C springs with uncut rears so it rides only about 1" lower than stock out back.

When i ran the stock SVO offset brakes, the edge of the tire was even with the edge of the fenderlip. That's 1.25" wider offset that stock fox. The 99+ rears are almost 1" wider than that.

What i did was use ranger axles and modified the offset to pull them back in to stock offset.

But you can't do that on the 99+ axles because Ford made the axles itself bigger on each end. The brake hardware on the ends is the same as 94-98. One way to fix it is to get an 8.8 from an 86-98 with the narrower housing and swap the brake hardware to that and use 94-98 mustang axles. That will give you a rear track tha is 0.75" wider which is perfect actually.

Or you could sell the 2000 rear and buy a 94-98 rear.

But install the rear first and see how bad it is. I don't really know anyone who has actually put one in because when it comes to 5-lug swaps, most guys are told to avoid using the 99+ rear ends completely.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
501
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Y
Brake issues again smh
  • Ybfav84
  • Mar 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
648
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 10, 2025
DR1962
D
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Tuesday at 3:59 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
151
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?