• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

The almighty 302....

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamadrummer88
  • Start date Start date May 30, 2006

tamadrummer88

Active Member
Aug 19, 2005
599
79
39
Aloha State
May 30, 2006
#1
  • May 30, 2006
  • #1
Well, when I get the car running on the road, Ill be using the 302 to get around (the 429 will come later, I wanna save enough to build it up good).

I read in a shop specs book that the 302 from 1968 is rated at 230 HP, and something like 275 torque at the crank. With todays standards, is the 302 still that powerful, or has the horsepower rating gone down? How much at the wheels will a stock 302 make?



John
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 30, 2006
#2
  • May 30, 2006
  • #2
Get yourself a late model roller 5.0. Will produce more power and be easy to mod with little things if you choose to make it more peppy.
 

tamadrummer88

Active Member
Aug 19, 2005
599
79
39
Aloha State
May 30, 2006
#3
  • May 30, 2006
  • #3
69Rcode_Mach1 said:
Get yourself a late model roller 5.0. Will produce more power and be easy to mod with little things if you choose to make it more peppy.
Click to expand...


The 302 aint gonna be in the car for very long (year tops) because a 429 is going in...i was just wondering what the power estimates would be on a 60's 302, and what kind of small mods would give it power. I have, on the side:

Tri-y headers
5.0 mustang electronic distributor
Edelbrock performer RPM manifold, edelbrock 600 CFM carb (got these when I had the plan of stroking and supercharging the stock 302)
flowmaster 50 series mufflers
new valveseals( the engine smokes)

how much of a power increase could i expect with these small parts? and, do these parts complement each other nicely?


John
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
May 30, 2006
#4
  • May 30, 2006
  • #4
Those parts would help. A stock 302 really isn't that powerful, but it depends on your perspective; I'm used to driving 4 cyl cars. 230hp is the old gross rating, it's really about 200hp or 160rwhp (on a good day).

OTOH you could send all those parts to me
HTH
--Kyle
PS: 30hp gain maybe?
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
May 30, 2006
#5
  • May 30, 2006
  • #5
In the early 90's they changed the way HP is rated by manufactures. In the olden days, HP was measured with *no accessories*. Beginning in about '93 I think they started measuring HP *with* the accessories. So 230 HP in 1968 is probably more like 200-210 HP by today's standards.
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
May 30, 2006
#6
  • May 30, 2006
  • #6
In the early 90s???
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
May 30, 2006
#7
  • May 30, 2006
  • #7
68keyblr said:
In the early 90's they changed the way HP is rated by manufactures.
Click to expand...
Bzzt! Incorrect! Correct answer is 1972.
 

tamadrummer88

Active Member
Aug 19, 2005
599
79
39
Aloha State
May 30, 2006
#8
  • May 30, 2006
  • #8
5.0ina66 said:
Those parts would help. A stock 302 really isn't that powerful, but it depends on your perspective; I'm used to driving 4 cyl cars. 230hp is the old gross rating, it's really about 200hp or 160rwhp (on a good day).

OTOH you could send all those parts to me
HTH
--Kyle
PS: 30hp gain maybe?
Click to expand...


haha thanks. To me, any motor is powerful that the car I use as my daily driver ( 91 toyota corolla with a 5 speed) the 302, to me, would feel like a motor with a turbo in my perspective. Even though i wont use the motor for long, its good to see what kind of potential this motor has, and even though a 429 is going in, I bought the manifold and carburator long ago, and its basically the only parts that I actually paid for. BUt now i need a new water pump, as the stock one is leaking.

John
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
448
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 28, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
891
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?