• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

The "CAI" is NOT a "performance" modification.

  • Thread starter Thread starter DMAN302
  • Start date Start date May 3, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
Next
First Prev 11 of 13 Next Last

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
May 19, 2005
#201
  • May 19, 2005
  • #201
ALMOST STOCK said:
Out of this whole thread *THAT* is the only thing that make since to me!!
Click to expand...
make since,,or made sense
 
M

MYSTICSVT

Founding Member
May 16, 2001
349
0
16
Meridian, Idaho
May 19, 2005
#202
  • May 19, 2005
  • #202
2000xp8 said:
No way i'm reading 8 pages, so forgive my lazyness.

On a mildly modified car (no heads, cam or intake) a Cold air intake does no more than a K&N filter in the air box.
Click to expand...

Here's an article that shows otherwise:

http://www.corral.net/tech/powerplant/moroso/moroso.html

3.5 RWHP gain over a K&N panel filter.

I went from a totally stock intake(paper filter with silencer) to the Moroso kit and definately noticed a gain. It wasn't mind blowing, but noticeable. Picked up 1.5 MPG as a bonus too.
 

ALMOST STOCK

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,250
41
88
CA.
May 19, 2005
#203
  • May 19, 2005
  • #203
willys1 Unless I misread something? Let me clarify my statement then. I agree with what nosmatt said and that being that DMAN is not an idiot.


I wholeheartedly DISAGREE that DMAN is an idiot.
Click to expand...
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
May 19, 2005
#204
  • May 19, 2005
  • #204
Thanks for the kind words nosmatt and Paul...as with MOST every aspect of life there will be opposing opinions, some will chose to put forth their ideas well, while others will choose less tactfull methods to express themselves. Companies are advertising 20+ hp gains for a product that just doesn't deliver..I didn't like it..I stated my opinion. I will admit to wanting to purchase a CAI myself in an effort to enhance the overall look of my engine compartment. Fact is though IF I do decide to purchase one it would be KNOWING its true purpose..appearance over performance. If you've had the fortune of seeing the bays of ALMOSTSTOCK and STANG22 you have to admit the inlet looks GREAT in place, and if appearance is the goal then this item is definately a fine addition. I stand by my original post though..the CAI is not a performance modification.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
May 19, 2005
#205
  • May 19, 2005
  • #205
SmockDoiley said:
I love it when people assume that just because they didnt see it, it must not be true. Your the one making these stupid claims, so you go back it up. I dont care how many employees you have. I think Donald Trump is an idiot, and he has more money than god so stop tooting your own horn. Your ill informed. Your sitting here saying that the pipe doesnt get the air cooler. No crap, like I said before, the Cold Air is in reference to pulling colder air from outside the engine bay.
Click to expand...

Well here I see it..then it MUST be true sir..
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2002/03/coldair/
Sorry if I came off as if "tooting my own horn"..but you did refer to me as an idiot..I was just putting forth reasons as to how you may be incorrect as to your reference towards me earlier. Thanks for your support..
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 20, 2005
#206
  • May 20, 2005
  • #206
SmockDoiley said:
Seijerou, you are wrong. They dont just pull numbers out of their ass and write them down. Somehow, they made those numbers on a dyno.... I'm sorry I cant pull the mag out of my a@# and scan it on here. But I'm sure you could look it up on HotRod.com or go look for the issue.
Click to expand...

You will never convince someone that you are correct if you first insult their intelligence.

"Somehow, they made those numbers" That is one of the issues. Are these companies making more power by intentionally skewing the data during dyno testing? For example what is the engine temp of the comparing runs. Was it the same for both? Of the testing I have seen there is very little documentation. Basically, can the test be reproduced with the same results in another lab by other personnel? Also, as mentioned in an earlier post, what vehicle was the testing done on? This will have a huge impact on the results.
I have seen some questionable things in Hot Rod (which is why I no longer subscribe). Just like other mags they exist to sell mags and sell advertising. Advertising is where the money is made. If Hot Rod can post great performance numbers for a product, then that company will be more likely to continue to advertise with them.
On a lighter note, Why do you keep your old mags there? Sounds painful if you read alot of mags.
 
L

L8 MUSL

Active Member
Jan 20, 2003
1,664
0
36
Carlsbad, Ca.
May 21, 2005
#207
  • May 21, 2005
  • #207
Wow, I can't believe this topic went 9 pages.
CAI's are right up there with underdrive pully's as far as I'm concerned.
You pay over 100 dollars for about 5 hp, (20 hp increase is just good old American marketing) and that is peak hp under the right conditions. I'm alway's basing on them both but I guess as far as a return on investment goes, I paid close to 2000 bucks for 100 hp with my blower so I guess the ROI is the same.
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
May 21, 2005
#208
  • May 21, 2005
  • #208
OK...I got to page 5 and didn't bother with the rest...The real question should be...What is a better setup...the fenderwall location of the MAF (stock) or using a conicle filter (under hood) location?
 
M

Mean86GT

New Member
May 15, 2005
46
0
0
May 21, 2005
#209
  • May 21, 2005
  • #209
my "cai" is a downpipe off a dodge turbo diesel pickup, on the end of that is my MAF meter and then my k/n filter. total spent: $0 the pipe was free from a friend. and i welded a bracket on to attach it to the strut tower to keep it from banging around. now another friend spent almost $200 on a bbk cai for his 88 GT. guess whose is faster.....
 
D

DMAC88LX

New Member
Nov 28, 2004
12
0
0
Boston
Jun 26, 2005
#210
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #210
i didn't read all 5 pages, so maybe someone already offered this..... have you ever heard of sound resonance, if you tune the length of the cai tube as well as the diameter the sound waves will actually allow the air to flow better... i'm not an expert but it makes sense to me, i have a ho ho honda accord and added an AEM cold air intake that you can hear and feel the difference in performance. companies wouldn't waste there time making the damn things after all these years if they didn't work.. You might think the consumer would catch wind of the fact it doesn't perform?? As for a 20 HP gain, i don't think so, but your throttle response def. improves. Oh, I also had the K&N cai on my 5.9 Dodge ram, and it made an incredible difference on throttle response and fuel economy.. Made the exhaust tone sound alot better too!
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Jun 26, 2005
#211
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #211
its not a waste of time for these companies to make unworking products, because most people still buy them, spelling big profits for the makers.
food for thought.
 

18mustangs

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
533
1
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Jun 26, 2005
#212
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #212
willys1 said:
I do know that the tubbing is "alot" larger then stock,and it uses a big cone K&N filter.. I have a few extra pieces,the unit is actually tuneable..Set up in different positions it "does" perform differently..But being plastic it does help out in the summer months..
Click to expand...

And lets not forget that removing any restriction to the air intake tract, whether it is removing the screen ford put over the MAF or putting a straight piece of aluminum pipe in place of the crinkled stock hose with 90* turns (on 94\95) will make an improvement in performance.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jun 26, 2005
#213
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #213
LOL,,I havent seen this thread in awhile!! Glad you agree
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Jun 26, 2005
#214
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #214
Like said above, it's not considered a waste of time if it doesn't do anything. It's concidered a waste of time if it doesn't sell. These companies are not in the buisness of making horsepower, they are in the buisness of making money. Alot of us know there is a placebo effect to doing mods. Once you do your CAI, and run your car up the street, you "feel" the gains. More often than not it's only because you want to. On other cars, yes CAI's may work wonders, but this thread is talking about CAI's on 5.0's specifically.

18mustangs, it's not quite that simple. The intake tubing is part of the intake tract that's furthest away from the motor. If you have a restriction that's close to the combustion chambers, say the lower intake. Then it doesn't matter how big, tuned, polished, whatever, you make everything before that point. The air is only going to flow as much as the _biggest_ restriction will allow. You can have 10 different restrictions in your intake system. But the only one that actually matters is the one that restricts the most.
 
L

L8 MUSL

Active Member
Jan 20, 2003
1,664
0
36
Carlsbad, Ca.
Jun 26, 2005
#215
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #215
DMAC88LX said:
have you ever heard of sound resonance, if you tune the length of the cai tube as well as the diameter the sound waves will actually allow the air to flow better... i'm not an expert but it makes sense to me, i have a honda accord
Click to expand...

Step away from the crack pipe friend.



DMAC88LX said:
companies wouldn't waste there time making the damn things after all these years if they didn't work..
Click to expand...

Heck no! they wouldn't trick us just to take our money

Die thred Die!
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jun 26, 2005
#216
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #216
L8 MUSL said:
Step away from the crack pipe friend.





Heck no! they wouldn't trick us just to take our money

Die thred Die!
Click to expand...
LOL,,,hey,why do ricers hang out on stangnet?
 

bullitstang1313

Member
Jan 21, 2003
713
0
16
Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana
Jun 27, 2005
#217
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #217
I can't believe you guys were all mislead by the advertising. The cold air intake doesn't give you the 20hp gain, its the sticker you put on the car that gives you the gain. Jeez guys, why else would they come with the kit.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Jun 27, 2005
#218
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #218
DIE THREAD! DIE!

:damnit:
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Jun 27, 2005
#219
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #219
Who the hell started this thing anyways...
 

CrazyCobra

New Member
Apr 25, 2005
124
0
0
Ontario
Jun 27, 2005
#220
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #220
L8 MUSL said:
Step away from the crack pipe friend.
Click to expand...
In responce to...
Originally Posted by DMAC88LX
have you ever heard of sound resonance, if you tune the length of the cai tube as well as the diameter the sound waves will actually allow the air to flow better... i'm not an expert but it makes sense to me
Click to expand...
I suppose you (L8 MUSL) don't believe in the purpose of tuned length headers either? The principal is the same. Car manufacturers spend millions in R&D doing just this very thing.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
Next
First Prev 11 of 13 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
224
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
301
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
306
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
799
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
A
Rough idle - cylinder 1 and 6 misfire HELP
  • austindavies935
  • Jul 24, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
772
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 24, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?