• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

The different flavors of ARP head studs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rusty67
  • Start date Start date Nov 3, 2007

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 3, 2007
#1
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #1
ARP makes a great product. I think everyone knows that by now. The thing is, they make head studs with these so called "optional features". I'm wondering if these extras are worth it for me.

12-point nuts
ARP says that a 12-point nut will allow you to retorque the head without removing the valve train. Is this even neccessary on a small block Ford ? Is this something that depends more on the valve springs you use then the type of head ? I'm just wondering if this will really save me any time at all.

undercut studs
From what I've read, the way I understand it is that an undercut stud has a small amount of metal removed from the stud in the area between the threads so that the studs are slightly more flexable. This supposedly helps to maintain the preload on the nut should lose some compression.

I did a search on google and read in another forum that the undercut studs are weaker. This guy called ARP and the tech told him undercut studs are better for street use and regular studs are better for race only engines.

I can't see a properly installed head gasket going south when used with studs and the head being correctly torqued. Are undercut studs worth the extra cash ?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 3, 2007
#2
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #2
personally i dont think under cut studs are worth the extra money. i also dont feel the need to use studs to secure the heads on a street engine either.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 3, 2007
#3
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #3
I've talked to several knowledgable people and everyone agrees that studs help to reduce head gasket failure.

Any comments on the 12 point nuts ?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 3, 2007
#4
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #4
12 point bolts and nuts allow for smaller sockets, while still allowing for the larger bolts and nuts. i dont disagree about studs allowing for more consistent clamping force on the head gasket, i just dont think they are needed for the street. that and they make it harder to remove the head in the car when the time does come.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Nov 3, 2007
#5
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #5
Read impossible to remove the head with the engine installed.

Head studs are for blown/turbod/sprayed applications making 600+ hp. Not practical for a street car.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 3, 2007
#6
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #6
CraigMBA said:
Read impossible to remove the head with the engine installed.

Head studs are for blown/turbod/sprayed applications making 600+ hp. Not practical for a street car.
Click to expand...

Maybe if it is a big block. Or maybe if the car is a 65-66. On a 302 you can get the heads out with studs in the car. You may have to jack the motor on one side to gain the extra clearance but it can be done.

I want studs for reliability. I don't really care about being practical on this issue.

At this point what I really want to know is, are the 12 point nuts worth my money ? Do I need them ? I thought I would be able to retorque the heads without removing the valve springs regaurldess of weather or not I used the smaller nuts or not.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Nov 4, 2007
#7
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #7
I have a '65. 67-later cars you can use studs, even though they will still be a pain.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Nov 4, 2007
#8
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #8
Maybe I am missing something here.

Modern ARP studs are broached with an allen head screw hole in the top. That allows the stud to be easily removed, just like a bolt. Maybe easier since studs are installed only finger tight.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Nov 4, 2007
#9
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #9
It is tight, but I have pulled heads off my 351 in a 67.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 4, 2007
#10
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #10
I've seen the hole studs are inconvinent for pulling the head while its still in the car argument in damn near every thread where studs come up. Honestly guys I'm not interested in that informatino as I've read it one too many times (no offense to anyone).

What I really want to know at this point is: Are 12 point nuts worth the extra cash ? I was under the impression that you can retorque heads on small block Fords just fine without these, am I wrong here ?
 
S

Spanish Dave

Member
Apr 23, 2003
147
1
18
Oliva, Valencia, Spain
Nov 4, 2007
#11
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #11
Rusty67 said:
I've seen the hole studs are inconvinent for pulling the head while its still in the car argument in damn near every thread where studs come up. Honestly guys I'm not interested in that informatino as I've read it one too many times (no offense to anyone).

What I really want to know at this point is: Are 12 point nuts worth the extra cash ? I was under the impression that you can retorque heads on small block Fords just fine without these, am I wrong here ?
Click to expand...

I think 12 point nuts *should* fit better in a 12 point socket ... but an ordinary 6 flat nut should not be any diiferent IMHO .... I would go for the cheaper of the 2. I think it would depend on your rockers ... I have the Summit *fat-boy* roller rockers and these are no problem. So the Harland Sharp or Crane Gold rockers should be OK
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 5, 2007
#12
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #12
Any other comments on the merit of 12 point nuts for a small block Ford head ?
 
S

Steel123

Banned
Nov 6, 2007
16
0
0
Nov 6, 2007
#13
  • Nov 6, 2007
  • #13
I have a '65. 67-later cars you can use studs, even though they will still be a pain
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
894
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
1969, 1970 mustang heater box repair/replace instructions (no AC)
  • 70mstang
  • Apr 9, 2023
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
6K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Apr 9, 2023
70mstang
Should I Get a New Clutch Fork and Pivot Ball Stud?
  • AeroCoupe
  • Dec 18, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2022
96pushrod
For Sale 2000 GT Conv 4.6 block, heads lots of misc engine parts all removed,degreased, cleaned and inspected.
  • Tods Hot Rods
  • Sep 17, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder Parts
Replies
3
Views
700
Engine and Power Adder Parts Sep 19, 2024
Tods Hot Rods
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?