• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

The time has come..

  • Thread starter Thread starter LilBerx
  • Start date Start date Mar 19, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Apr 10, 2013
#41
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #41
Not an upgrade IMHO.
 

93project

Active Member
Apr 21, 2009
549
52
38
El Paso, tx
Apr 10, 2013
#42
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #42
The "Bruce Jenner" is what started the loss of interest for me in newer mustangs. I like the boxy noisy fox first, and the 60's era after. As for all other mustangs, ... I'd buy a new srt8 challenger over all of them

sent from from a guy with a sweet
fox mustang and a 66 coupe!
 

Attachments

  • uploadfromtaptalk1365649843275.webp
    22.4 KB · Views: 99

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Apr 10, 2013
#43
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #43
I miss my 94 GT. If SN95s were as light as a fox coupe I would have bought another one. I like the stance and the fact that you can fit wide wheels/tire on them without modification. Oh, and they're more aerodynamic than the brick we call a fox body. The only thing I didn't like about my 94 was the tan interior. If it would have been black I would have been fine with it. But I will always love foxes too. They are more of a muscle car than the SN cars.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 11, 2013
#44
  • Apr 11, 2013
  • #44
ratio411 said:
Not an upgrade IMHO.
Click to expand...

Which of these part over the Fox isn't the upgrade? The racey 4.6L DOHC 305hp 4V engine? The all wheel antilock disk brakes with 13" rotors up front? The revised suspension geometry? The 5-lug wheel/tire upgrade? The stiffer, more rigid unibody and outer shell? The more ergonomic and functional interior?

It's funny....with the exception of the 4V engine swap, 95% of the Fox Mustang owners I know try to at the very least mimic all of the above upgrades that came standard on his Cobra?

You and I are normally on the same page my friend, but looks are subjective. From every other aspect, the OP's Cobra is indeed an upgrade over the Fox.
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
Apr 11, 2013
#45
  • Apr 11, 2013
  • #45
Congrats OP!

I'm partial to the SN95s, and going to miss mine when I sell it this summer (once the snow stops--it's APRIL, already). That said, i can't justify keeping 3, and the 95 is the odd man out. But, you're gonna love your new Cobra!
 

93project

Active Member
Apr 21, 2009
549
52
38
El Paso, tx
Apr 11, 2013
#46
  • Apr 11, 2013
  • #46
Gearbanger 101 said:
Which of these part over the Fox isn't the upgrade? The racey 4.6L DOHC 305hp 4V engine? The all wheel antilock disk brakes with 13" rotors up front? The revised suspension geometry? The 5-lug wheel/tire upgrade? The stiffer, more rigid unibody and outer shell? The more ergonomic and functional interior?

It's funny....with the exception of the 4V engine swap, 95% of the Fox Mustang owners I know try to at the very least mimic all of the above upgrades that came standard on his Cobra?

You and I are normally on the same page my friend, but looks are subjective. From every other aspect, the OP's Cobra is indeed an upgrade over the Fox.
Click to expand...
Lol.. You are right on fox owners doing those sn upgrades! I've stiffened the frame, done cobra 13" up front! But still. They're just newer style upgrades for my favorite mustang
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Apr 11, 2013
#47
  • Apr 11, 2013
  • #47
Gearbanger 101 said:
Which of these part over the Fox isn't the upgrade....
Click to expand...

I was being 'tongue in cheek' and showing my preference for the Fox body style and so called "Windsor" style engines.
It wasn't personal, and in a large part, was meant as light "ribbing".

I suppose I should have added some sort of "smiley"...
Maybe "stir the pot" would have been appropriate.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 11, 2013
#48
  • Apr 11, 2013
  • #48
It's ok....I was being a little sarcastic myself.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Transmission
  • Jraesims
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
164
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
JD1964
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
483
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
213
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Lost my Foxbody
  • Mhalc1
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
669
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
Mhalc1
S
New here , too many cars and too many problems
  • spencergt66
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
159
The Welcome Wagon Mar 21, 2026
spencergt66
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?