• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Brakes The Ultimate 4-lug/5-lug Brake Conversion/upgrade Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang5L5
  • Start date Start date Nov 28, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • …
  • 24
Next
First Prev 16 of 24 Next Last
S

Slumone

New Member
May 7, 2019
24
0
1
14609
Jul 24, 2020
#301
  • Jul 24, 2020
  • #301
They are a bit more different than a coating. A bit too different for me to run them comfortably. Here are some shots of the rotors themselves, as you can see the castings themselves are different and the one that came in the plastic bag is the prettier of the two on the right.

198 is the rotor the Ford Dealership offers though they gave me when I told them where I got the 54 from. Anyone need a BRR-54?
 

Wayne Waldrep

Before I post a pic, do you have one of yours?
20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 14, 2003
1,338
659
143
Cuba, AL
Jul 24, 2020
#302
  • Jul 24, 2020
  • #302
I'm blind....I see no difference...lol. Seriously..I don't.
 
S

Slumone

New Member
May 7, 2019
24
0
1
14609
Jul 24, 2020
#303
  • Jul 24, 2020
  • #303
Wayne Waldrep said:
I'm blind....I see no difference...lol. Seriously..I don't.
Click to expand...
Yeah there is 90% chance I am overthinking this but I have completely swapped my entire suspension, third member, as well as braking and steering systems since the last time I drove this car. If swapping a single rotor gives me that much less to potentially troubleshoot, I think its worth the effort.
 
C

claypoolxx

Member
Oct 13, 2013
50
14
19
Oct 3, 2020
#304
  • Oct 3, 2020
  • #304
I did what I think is a proper swap, but I am having some issues. I have a good brake feel and strength, but the pedal feels too low.

Here's what I have on my 93 mustang gt:
1. stock front calipers
2. stock brake booster
3. 93 svt cobra r master cylinder
4. rear calipers and discs from a 94 gt
5. willwood proportioning valve

If I did my calculations correctly I have a 15.6 ratio for the pedal feel. I like the feel and the stopping power, but there is too much dead space at the top of the pedal. any ideas? Thanks for any help
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,252
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Oct 3, 2020
#305
  • Oct 3, 2020
  • #305
Make sure booster pushrod lenght is adjusted properly. If it’s not out far enough, the dead space will give you the feel of extra travel at the beginning of your braking stroke
 
Reactions: Slumone
C

claypoolxx

Member
Oct 13, 2013
50
14
19
Oct 3, 2020
#306
  • Oct 3, 2020
  • #306
Mustang5L5 said:
Make sure booster pushrod lenght is adjusted properly. If it’s not out far enough, the dead space will give you the feel of extra travel at the beginning of your braking stroke
Click to expand...
I didn’t think that was possible.
 
C

claypoolxx

Member
Oct 13, 2013
50
14
19
Oct 3, 2020
#307
  • Oct 3, 2020
  • #307
claypoolxx said:
I didn’t think that was possible.
Click to expand...
Ok. Just checked YouTube. Looks pretty easy. Thanks.
 
S

Slumone

New Member
May 7, 2019
24
0
1
14609
Oct 3, 2020
#308
  • Oct 3, 2020
  • #308
claypoolxx said:
Ok. Just checked YouTube. Looks pretty easy. Thanks.
Click to expand...
This is decent. I had a better one but cannot find it now.

Got A Soft Brake Pedal? How to check the Booster Pin to Master Cylinder Gap | Master Power Brakes

Got A Soft Brake Pedal? How to check the Booster Pin to Master Cylinder Gap | Master Power Brakes
techtalk.mpbrakes.com
 

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,954
2,936
153
Long Island, NY
Oct 14, 2020
#309
  • Oct 14, 2020
  • #309
I’m throwing this question out in this thread, because nothing I search comes up with an answer.
I’m planning on 5lug rear disc swap with 94-04 calipers. I bought fox length axles with sn95 flange. They did not come with wheel studs. Are 3” studs the proper length for this conversion?

This is the part number I keep seeing the most, but no confirmation for working with this swap. Any help would be awesome!
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/mor-46180
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,252
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Oct 14, 2020
#310
  • Oct 14, 2020
  • #310
I have a set of 94-98 axles handy.

They are 2.25" long total length.

I guess that would be 2.00" underhead length. 3" would work, they would just stick out further. Depends on what wheels you are running and if you are adding spacers
 
Reactions: Rdub6 and KRUISR

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,954
2,936
153
Long Island, NY
Oct 14, 2020
#311
  • Oct 14, 2020
  • #311
Mustang5L5 said:
I have a set of 94-98 axles handy.

They are 2.25" long total length.

I guess that would be 2.00" underhead length. 3" would work, they would just stick out further. Depends on what wheels you are running and if you are adding spacers
Click to expand...
Thank you! I’m 99% committed on the FR500 wheels from LMR. I do not want to run spacers! I thought the 3” sounded too long, especially for the acorn style lug nuts!
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,816
925
143
Oct 14, 2020
#312
  • Oct 14, 2020
  • #312
As listed on rockauto, stock '95 5.0L rear wheel studs...

More Information for PTC 97284
 

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,954
2,936
153
Long Island, NY
Oct 14, 2020
#313
  • Oct 14, 2020
  • #313
KRUISR said:
As listed on rockauto, stock '95 5.0L rear wheel studs...

More Information for PTC 97284
Click to expand...
That just set off one of those “dumbass” moments. I was searching....Foxbody/ 5lug disc swap/ etc. Should’ve just searched for a stock SN95 stud! TY!
 
C

claypoolxx

Member
Oct 13, 2013
50
14
19
Nov 10, 2020
#314
  • Nov 10, 2020
  • #314
claypoolxx said:
I did what I think is a proper swap, but I am having some issues. I have a good brake feel and strength, but the pedal feels too low.

Here's what I have on my 93 mustang gt:
1. stock front calipers
2. stock brake booster
3. 93 svt cobra r master cylinder
4. rear calipers and discs from a 94 gt
5. willwood proportioning valve

If I did my calculations correctly I have a 15.6 ratio for the pedal feel. I like the feel and the stopping power, but there is too much dead space at the top of the pedal. any ideas? Thanks for any help
Click to expand...
So, I've had a chance to mess with it more. I adjusted the rod on the brake booster, but that's not it. I lengthened it a little bit and the pedal felt good, but when I went for a short drive the brakes were dragging. I loosened it just a little and now its back to how it was before, with too much dead space at the top of the pedal.

Now something I didn't think to mention is that I don't have the parking brake connected. My buddy told me that the rear calipers adjust themselves with the parking brake and without one the pistons retract too far and the dead space I feel is the pedal taking up all of the dead space. Does that make sense? Also, I always planned on getting the parking brake working, but figured I could wait a little. Is there a kit that I can get to set up the parking brake? I've seen people do it many different ways, but I'm looking for easiest way.
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,816
925
143
Nov 10, 2020
#315
  • Nov 10, 2020
  • #315
I would disagree with the statement that the parking brake adjusts the rear calipers. They are disc brakes, just like front brakes they are adjusted by brake fluid not returning to the reservoir. If you look at rear calipers, there is a spring that pushes the parking brake arm back to a home position. So long as that arm is back to home position brake performance should not be affected.

Some calipers have pistons that must be rotated to retract when replacing brake pads, but I do not think that is related to parking brake movement. Think of all the automatic equipped cars that NEVER use their parking brake, yet the rear brakes work fine and stay adjusted.

As far as setting up parking brake, I used 94/95 cables, I modified a parking brake handle from an '01 (to get proper spring to apply correct tension to cables) by cutting an moving the rear mounting tab forward 1". The rest bolts up and fits perfect. You will also need the front cable mount (see SN cars for the factory mount or fab your own - as I did). Otherwise it is pretty straight forward.
 
C

claypoolxx

Member
Oct 13, 2013
50
14
19
Nov 22, 2020
#316
  • Nov 22, 2020
  • #316
I had the brakes vacuum bled and it did the trick. Brake pedal feels pretty good. Now onto the myriad of engine codes and leaky transmission. Thanks for the help.
 

mustang33189

Member
Dec 22, 2020
7
1
13
Richmond VA
Dec 22, 2020
#317
  • Dec 22, 2020
  • #317
Mustang5L5 said:
70/30 is the ideal goal.

EDIT: I remove my bias calcs as I found some mistakes. I'll update when I get what I think are accurate numbers

If the rear end of your car was heavy, say with an IRS, then I think the 99-04 Cobra/43mm rear setup may work fine.

As for master cylinder, it's going depend highly on the entire combo. With the ATS Brembo's, a 1" bore MC might be a tad soft with the 43mm rears, but the 1 1/16" bore MC might only be slightly firmer than a factory 94-98 Cobra setup.
Click to expand...

Mustang5L5 said:
According to MM, factory bias is 73/27 with the 38mm rears.



Changing to 43mm rears and the 11.65" rotor, I get 68% front/32% rear. I believe 70-75% front is considered ideal.

Keep in mind, if you buy the 43mm rears, you still need the SN95 pad hanger bracket. You can't use the Taurus one.

Unsure if these are the Cobra ones.

1994-2001, 2003-2004 Ford Mustang Brake Caliper Bracket - A1 Cardone 14-1042 - Rear Left - PartsGeek.com

Buy 1994-2001, 2003-2004 Ford Mustang Brake Caliper Bracket Rear Left A1 Cardone for a low price of $20.72 at PartsGeek. FLAT RATE SHIPPING on most A1 Cardone 14-1042 orders.
www.partsgeek.com
Click to expand...
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,252
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Dec 22, 2020
#318
  • Dec 22, 2020
  • #318
I can’t tell what I wrote and what the question was?
 

mustang33189

Member
Dec 22, 2020
7
1
13
Richmond VA
Dec 22, 2020
#319
  • Dec 22, 2020
  • #319
Mustang5L5 said:
According to MM, factory bias is 73/27 with the 38mm rears.



Changing to 43mm rears and the 11.65" rotor, I get 68% front/32% rear. I believe 70-75% front is considered ideal.

Keep in mind, if you buy the 43mm rears, you still need the SN95 pad hanger bracket. You can't use the Taurus one.

Unsure if these are the Cobra ones.

1994-2001, 2003-2004 Ford Mustang Brake Caliper Bracket - A1 Cardone 14-1042 - Rear Left - PartsGeek.com

Buy 1994-2001, 2003-2004 Ford Mustang Brake Caliper Bracket Rear Left A1 Cardone for a low price of $20.72 at PartsGeek. FLAT RATE SHIPPING on most A1 Cardone 14-1042 orders.
www.partsgeek.com
Click to expand...

Mustang5L5 said:
According to MM, factory bias is 73/27 with the 38mm rears.



Changing to 43mm rears and the 11.65" rotor, I get 68% front/32% rear. I believe 70-75% front is considered ideal.

Keep in mind, if you buy the 43mm rears, you still need the SN95 pad hanger bracket. You can't use the Taurus one.

Unsure if these are the Cobra ones.

1994-2001, 2003-2004 Ford Mustang Brake Caliper Bracket - A1 Cardone 14-1042 - Rear Left - PartsGeek.com

Buy 1994-2001, 2003-2004 Ford Mustang Brake Caliper Bracket Rear Left A1 Cardone for a low price of $20.72 at PartsGeek. FLAT RATE SHIPPING on most A1 Cardone 14-1042 orders.
www.partsgeek.com
Click to expand...
So I have the front ATS conversion on my 01. If I do the
Mustang5L5 said:
I can’t tell what I wrote and what the question was?
Click to expand...
Not sure where my original question went... lets try again... I have the ATS already installed on the front of my 01 gt. I have added weight up front with the coyote swap, blower, cooler, and extra fluid. I have the battery related to the rear and a roll cage as well. Would I benefit from the 43mm rear upgrade? Also will my factory master cylinder support both the ATS and 43 mm calipers?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,252
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Dec 23, 2020
#320
  • Dec 23, 2020
  • #320
The factory MC would support the calipers. Hydroboost is different than vacuum type boosters. Where Ford used a different size for each vacuum brake setup, they only used 1 MC for the differenve brakes with hydroboost. 1” for 96-98 and 1 1/16” for 99-04.

your stock 99-04 calipers actually have less piston surface area than the ATS brembos. So changing to the 43mm rear calipers would still be around what your stock setup was in terms of surface areA. So yes, it would work with the MC

as to it the bias would be correct? I cannot answer that. Do you actually have a front/rear weight bias? Or just making assumptions as to how the vehicles weight has changed? If you are using the rear GT brakes, The bias is probably still fairly front heavy even if you’ve added weight up front. You might want to consider the Ford M-2300-M kit in addition to the 43mm rears. That bias would be pretty close to stock.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • …
  • 24
Next
First Prev 16 of 24 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
502
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Y
Resolved 5 lug conversion
  • Ybfav84
  • Dec 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
602
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2024
AeroCoupe
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?