• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Brakes The Ultimate 4-lug/5-lug Brake Conversion/upgrade Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang5L5
  • Start date Start date Nov 28, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • …
  • 24
Next
First Prev 8 of 24 Next Last

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Aug 27, 2015
#141
  • Aug 27, 2015
  • #141
The T/C calipers are 45mm vs the sn95 38mm rear calipers, so with the sn95 mc you aren't pushing enough volume for the setup.

Two options...svo MC or swap to the 38mm sn95 calipers.

Are you running that setup 4-lug or 5-lug?


Sent from my big ass iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
 

Carl H

New Member
Jan 27, 2013
15
2
4
Mountain Home, Idaho
Aug 27, 2015
#142
  • Aug 27, 2015
  • #142
5 lug using Mazda MPV rotors and NRC brackets.

I got rears for a song so I think my engine bay is gonna go old school with the SVO mc.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Aug 27, 2015
#143
  • Aug 27, 2015
  • #143
If you do that, keep in mind the fronts are 66mm calipers vs the 73mm used on the SVO. You may find yourself with a slightly firmer pedal than you'd like. In that case, your only option will be to SN95 booster the car to get more assist.
 

Carl H

New Member
Jan 27, 2013
15
2
4
Mountain Home, Idaho
Aug 27, 2015
#144
  • Aug 27, 2015
  • #144
Ok, I'll have to keep that in mind. Do you think the larger rears will help offset the smaller fronts though? Since I'm losing 7mm in the front but gaining 7mm in the rear it 'should be a wash but I'll have to the math on it to be sure.
 

Carl H

New Member
Jan 27, 2013
15
2
4
Mountain Home, Idaho
Aug 27, 2015
#145
  • Aug 27, 2015
  • #145
I did the math and wow, with TC rear calipers and SVO fronts with a SVO mc the ratio is over 18. Definitely not a wash...math rules all.

I would end up with my current calipers and SVO mc at a 15.70 ratio. Heck of a lot better than over 17!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Aug 28, 2015
#146
  • Aug 28, 2015
  • #146
Carl H said:
Ok, I'll have to keep that in mind. Do you think the larger rears will help offset the smaller fronts though? Since I'm losing 7mm in the front but gaining 7mm in the rear it 'should be a wash but I'll have to the math on it to be sure.
Click to expand...


Sorry, I was 2 glasses deep in some scotch last night. I overlooked the fact that the SVO rears are 54mm vs the TC's 45mm calipers.

So with that said, your total surface area with the 66mm/45mm setup would still be slightly less than the SVO's 73/54mm setup. With the SVO MC it puts your pedal ratio around 15.7 which would be better than the 17.5 you currently have (higher number equals softer pedal feel)

Also keep in mind the SVO MC is tiny, so if you decide the pedal feel is a little firm, you can look into a booster swap
 
N

NightFury

New Member
Aug 2, 2015
24
2
1
Aug 31, 2015
#147
  • Aug 31, 2015
  • #147
Mustang5L5 said:
Also, does "double pumping" the brake pedal while stopping build the pedal up and give better brake response?
Click to expand...

It didn't help before, but I haven't tried it since replacing my rear calipers.

Is it possible there could be air trapped in either the stock or aftermarket proportioning valves? That seems like the only other place air could be. I've bled the calipers about 4,000 times and I see no air bubbles.

I also pulled off the fronts and watched the pistons move as the brake pedal was depressed, so I know they aren't seized. The pistons moved one at a time but I assume that's normal. When I clamped the one that moved the other one moved fine.

I'm about to take the new rears for a test drive. If it all still doesn't work, I'm gonna be at my wits end.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Sep 1, 2015
#148
  • Sep 1, 2015
  • #148
Double pumping usually is a sign of air in the system. If it makes no difference, and your pedal is rock hard when the engine is off, I wouldn't think there would be air in the lines.

So that leads me to asking what sort of brake pads are you running?
 
N

NightFury

New Member
Aug 2, 2015
24
2
1
Sep 1, 2015
#149
  • Sep 1, 2015
  • #149
Oh, with engine off? Then yes, double (even triple) pumping will build up pressure. Should I crack the nuts on the prop valves and bleed those? I'm running out of places to check.

Using Hawk ceramic pads.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Sep 1, 2015
#150
  • Sep 1, 2015
  • #150
Sorry. Engine on. Does a quick double pump buiuld pressure? If not, then it's prob not air in the lines.

With the engine off, after a few pumps the pedal should be rock hard
 
N

NightFury

New Member
Aug 2, 2015
24
2
1
Sep 1, 2015
#151
  • Sep 1, 2015
  • #151
Mustang5L5 said:
Sorry. Engine on. Does a quick double pump buiuld pressure? If not, then it's prob not air in the lines.

With the engine off, after a few pumps the pedal should be rock hard
Click to expand...

So the new rears feel better and the system appears to be working correctly based on what you're describing. I'm wondering if maybe I was just expecting more out of the upgrade. The car stops but I can't lock up the wheels. Could that be a brake pad issue?

Might not be a fair comparison but when I get on the brakes in my 2012 Edge Sport, my sunglasses fly off my face. I don't get that sensation here.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Sep 1, 2015
#152
  • Sep 1, 2015
  • #152
Depends on which hawk pads you have. The streets or the race compounds. The more aggressive versions require a little more heat before they begin to bite. When cold, they just feel weak.

I also wonder if your booster is working properly. Was it new, or a used unit?
 
N

NightFury

New Member
Aug 2, 2015
24
2
1
Sep 1, 2015
#153
  • Sep 1, 2015
  • #153
Pads are performance ceramic (yellow box). And the booster pushes the MC just fine. If it wasnt working, wouldn't it be stiff?
 
N

NightFury

New Member
Aug 2, 2015
24
2
1
Sep 2, 2015
#154
  • Sep 2, 2015
  • #154
Oh and the BB was a rebuilt unit.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Sep 2, 2015
#155
  • Sep 2, 2015
  • #155
I'm puzzled. Your setup should be performing quite well. It's been done plenty of times. Gotta be something simple being overlooked.
 
N

NightFury

New Member
Aug 2, 2015
24
2
1
Sep 3, 2015
#156
  • Sep 3, 2015
  • #156
Mustang5L5 said:
I'm puzzled. Your setup should be performing quite well. It's been done plenty of times. Gotta be something simple being overlooked.
Click to expand...

Do you think I should take it all out and start over? I'm tempted to get the prop valve eliminator kit from Maximum Motorsports to eliminate the possibility of air being stuck in the stock valve. Like you, I'm out of ideas. Unless air is stuck somewhere that can't be bled out, I'm not sure what else to do.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Sep 3, 2015
#157
  • Sep 3, 2015
  • #157
I don't think it's air though. If it was air, you would be able to tell by double-pumping the pedal while under braking and see the pedal effort become better. Since you said that that does not change how the pedal responds, I don't think air is the case here.

Are those front calipers used? How well did the pistons retract when you pushed them in? Did they move easily?
 
N

NightFury

New Member
Aug 2, 2015
24
2
1
Sep 3, 2015
#158
  • Sep 3, 2015
  • #158
Mustang5L5 said:
I don't think it's air though. If it was air, you would be able to tell by double-pumping the pedal while under braking and see the pedal effort become better. Since you said that that does not change how the pedal responds, I don't think air is the case here.

Are those front calipers used? How well did the pistons retract when you pushed them in? Did they move easily?
Click to expand...

Pistons moved freely. Required minimal effort to return them into the bore. Slide pins also moved freely. Can I fly you out to California to look at it for me? haha.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Sep 3, 2015
#159
  • Sep 3, 2015
  • #159
94-95 spindles
98 brake booster
98 prop valve
2004 cobra front rotors
2004 cobra calipers
2004 cobra IRS rear brakes
2001 e brake handle
2001 e brake cable bracket bolted to tunnel 2004 cobra e brake cables
SLP line lock
Ran hard brake line to factory Y at IRS rear
Braided hoses ran up front for cobra front calipers.

Stops on a dime no issues...roasts tires really good too
 
N

NightFury

New Member
Aug 2, 2015
24
2
1
Oct 21, 2015
#160
  • Oct 21, 2015
  • #160
So Mike, I started re-reading these to see if I missed anything, and twice you mentioned the use of the 94+ SN95 MC when using the PBR calipers. I know you say the 93 Cobra should work fine but it seems like maybe you used to prefer the 1 1/16" MC for that particular upgrade?

87-93  Ford Fox Body Mustang Brake Upgrades

87-93  Ford Fox Body Mustang Brake Upgrades
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • …
  • 24
Next
First Prev 8 of 24 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
501
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Y
Resolved 5 lug conversion
  • Ybfav84
  • Dec 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
601
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2024
AeroCoupe
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
731
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?