• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Thinking about going TURBO, talk me out of it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FoxMustangLvr
  • Start date Start date Oct 24, 2018
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,158
21,327
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 26, 2018
#21
  • Oct 26, 2018
  • #21
John Dirks Jr said:
You're only making 326rwhp running 11psi? You're running stock E7 heads? Thats holding you back big time!

I'm putting down 400rwhp at 10psi with 302 stock bottom end componants (other than balancing), mildly ported GT40 irons and Explorer intake. 1.7 rockers with stock cam.

I would seriously think about getting some better heads if I were you. Those E7's are gonna bottle neck a turbo too.

Get some nice aluminum heads and lose weight too.
Click to expand...


This is a good point. Power adder alone does not a stop-light beast, make.

It makes a little more sense where some of the turbo idea might be coming from since you're already aware of the associated headaches. Granted that doing many things is a PITA with a KB sitting on-top too.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Oct 27, 2018
#22
  • Oct 27, 2018
  • #22
I came in here to say, go turbo and don't look back! However, a few people have made really good points. Why not just upgrade heads and do an intercooler setup on your car?

On the flip side of things. I would buy the 0n3 kit minus the turbo, purchase a better turbo to minimize spool time. Technology has improved greatly, spool time is nearly a thing of the past. Not sure if On3 has a twin kit for the fox, if so that's the road I would take.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,034
1,625
194
NJ
Oct 27, 2018
#23
  • Oct 27, 2018
  • #23
I'm all for tinkering, I pretty much mess with everything I own (not only cars), but I usually do it for the better.
It doesn't sound like you want more power, just something to fool around with.

So I think you have to weigh the pro's and cons.
Pros:
More power (which it doesn't really sound like you care about)
Something to tinker with

Cons:
Loss of low end that i'm sure you are used to
It's sure to be a money pit
Likely a Headache
Probably snowball into other issues
Who really knows how much boost a stock headed engine is going to put up with

I just don't see the upside and since you aren't really making this about more power I think you are just asking for trouble.

I'd put the money elsewhere.
Not sure what trans you have now, but i'm more of the belief these days that you do a good trans before you add power.
If that's already done, i'm in the add Heads and a cam camp.
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,740
3,189
203
Taylorsville ky
Oct 27, 2018
#24
  • Oct 27, 2018
  • #24
Have twoFox body’s
 

Cammer429

Member
Oct 26, 2018
9
2
13
FarEast TN
Oct 27, 2018
#25
  • Oct 27, 2018
  • #25
FoxMustangLvr said:
I've been debating this for a little while and now a decent deal has popped up locally for a NIB ON3 70mm complete kit including intercooler. Why should I not switch? I love my combo however I'm a little board with not having something to tinker with and I've always wanted to try this type of forced induction.

Current combo
Stock 302 from oil pan to lower intake
Kenne Bell Flowzilla supercharged at 11psi, non intercooled
Stinger Pimp tuning platform
326rwhp/396rwtq

I would run a similar amount of boost with the turbo but I'd probably gain a bit more HP from being intercooled which will help greatly with IAT's especially during the summer time. I hate the under hood heat that turbo's make and all of the heat shielding and wrapping required to keep it in check. I would upgrade the wastegate and BOV which seems to be a popular choice to do.

Jack stand jokes aside, why not?
Click to expand...

I am new to this forum so I don't know if the majority here are naturally aspirated or forced induction fans. So after reading your thread I don't quite understand why you are switching. Leaving out Nitrous its no secret that most of the ford guys (5.0 90%) around here run a positive displacement or centrifugal superchargers on the street. If they happen to do a little outlaw street racing or legal weekend drag strip racing (at Bristol) most run 'Turbosupercharging' or a combo. Things might be different in your part of the world. Lastly, and this is another personal opinion, turbos aren't quite as reliable as a belt driven supercharger. Hey if boredom is really the main reason you are thinking about the change, I have a 2004 Mustang project with a 232 ci 6cyl. Why don't you wrench me turbo with about 16 pounds of boost on it. To be super un-bored I need U to build my little 6 as a dedicated supercharger motor...how about it? (Just kidding!) ~
 
Last edited: Oct 27, 2018
Reactions: FoxMustangLvr

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
Oct 27, 2018
#26
  • Oct 27, 2018
  • #26
Haha I seen that kit on craigslist. And I just noticed you live in the same town as me so that makes sense haha. I personally would keep the KB. Depending on how you drive it I guess is what would make the difference. But for a street car then KB all the way imo.
 
Reactions: FoxMustangLvr

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Oct 29, 2018
#27
  • Oct 29, 2018
  • #27
ID89GT said:
Haha I seen that kit on craigslist. And I just noticed you live in the same town as me so that makes sense haha. I personally would keep the KB. Depending on how you drive it I guess is what would make the difference. But for a street car then KB all the way imo.
Click to expand...
Hello neighbor! I got excited for a second seeing that you live near me and have a black hatchback. I've spotted a nice one a couple times in North Spokane and have been wanting to run him down to talk to him. I thought it was you but you have a 4eye, this guy has a 87-93 model. We'll have to cruise some time!!
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Oct 29, 2018
#28
  • Oct 29, 2018
  • #28
2000xp8 said:
I'm all for tinkering, I pretty much mess with everything I own (not only cars), but I usually do it for the better.
It doesn't sound like you want more power, just something to fool around with.

So I think you have to weigh the pro's and cons.
Pros:
More power (which it doesn't really sound like you care about)
Something to tinker with

Cons:
Loss of low end that i'm sure you are used to
It's sure to be a money pit
Likely a Headache
Probably snowball into other issues
Who really knows how much boost a stock headed engine is going to put up with

I just don't see the upside and since you aren't really making this about more power I think you are just asking for trouble.

I'd put the money elsewhere.
Not sure what trans you have now, but i'm more of the belief these days that you do a good trans before you add power.
If that's already done, i'm in the add Heads and a cam camp.
Click to expand...
As always (IMO) you're a voice of reason. Some others have given some good advice too. My motive is completely focused on improving efficiency, tinkering, and trying something new. I do not want more HP, well at least nothing significant anyway. I have been back to 92rhocp's thread and taking notes. I have decided to intercool my KB. While my supercharger is removed for modification I will go ahead and install ARP studs, I've been lucky so far with my original head bolts. I will likely add my ProMeth kit while things are apart. What sucks is that I was planning on using my windshield washer reservoir as my meth tank. My intercooler piping will run through that hole so I'll have to come up with something else.

This is what happens when your car is "done"
 
Reactions: 90sickfox and RaggedGT
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
1990 On3 Turbo Build/Review
  • BryanNux
  • Feb 18, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 21, 2019
a91what
Turbo Talk
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Jul 11, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 11, 2016
CarMichael Angelo
T
Fox No Boost And Stumped
  • TWEECD
  • Aug 12, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2017
TWEECD
T
On3 Performance .. Not Impressed.
  • Boosted92LX
  • Jan 1, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
136
Views
28K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 4, 2015
TOOLOW91
On3 Performance: Buyer Beware
  • Boosted92LX
  • Jan 1, 2015
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 1, 2015
Boosted92LX
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?