this rear is nice?? Huh?

oogtdude

Banned

Jun 9, 2002

1,626

0

0

Dec 6, 2003

#1

• Dec 6, 2003

• #1

the real deal!

 

oogtdude

Banned

Jun 9, 2002

1,626

0

0

Dec 6, 2003

#2

• Dec 6, 2003

• #2

 

oogtdude

Banned

Jun 9, 2002

1,626

0

0

Dec 6, 2003

#3

• Dec 6, 2003

• #3

int...the front looks nice and the interior is cool...but thats it! along with 3800lb

i'll keep my 04 mach!

 

mike keirstead

New Member

Aug 6, 2003

1,121

0

0

ROLLING A JOINT

Dec 6, 2003

#4

• Dec 6, 2003

• #4

That rear is absolutly gross (opinion)
I hope that aint the final product.........

 

oogtdude

Banned

Jun 9, 2002

1,626

0

0

Dec 6, 2003

#5

• Dec 6, 2003

• #5

mike keirstead said:

That rear is absolutly gross (opinion)
I hope that aint the final product.........

Click to expand...

it is

 

O

Omegalock

New Member

Aug 31, 2003

616

0

0

Dec 6, 2003

#6

• Dec 6, 2003

• #6

1) Those are old pics
2) They are of the test mule
3) They are allegedly pics of the V6 Stang
4) The GT Stang is stated to look decidedly different from the V6 version.
5) The 3800 lb rumor is far from substaniated.

 

MustangMuscleV8

New Member

Dec 2, 2003

173

0

0

Stangnet.com

Dec 6, 2003

#7

• Dec 6, 2003

• #7

we won't know for sure, until next year.

 

oogtdude

Banned

Jun 9, 2002

1,626

0

0

Dec 6, 2003

#8

• Dec 6, 2003

• #8

well, i posted that rear pic at brads site, and he deleted and said he wasent suppose to post those pics..........that front end is exactly the same as that scanned pic that he posted

 

tylers65

I've got your tool right here!

Jan 7, 2001

3,278

0

57

Tacoma, WA

Dec 6, 2003

#9

• Dec 6, 2003

• #9

MustangMuscleV8 said:

we won't know for sure, until next year.

Click to expand...

You make it sound so far away when you say next year.

Next month sounds better to me

Really, we will see it in less than a month.

 

SVTdriver

Founding Member

Sep 2, 2001

3,319

0

0

Seattle Wa

Dec 6, 2003

#10

• Dec 6, 2003

• #10

Please do keep your mach. I want more people out there to keep there old lesserpowered cars. That way I have my choice of new mustangs. i am sorry you don't like the wide angle pics. But oh well. More choices for me.

 

oogtdude

Banned

Jun 9, 2002

1,626

0

0

Dec 6, 2003

#11

• Dec 6, 2003

• #11

SVTdriver said:

Please do keep your mach. I want more people out there to keep there old lesserpowered cars. That way I have my choice of new mustangs. i am sorry you don't like the wide angle pics. But oh well. More choices for me.

Click to expand...

rumor has it 3v 300hp...same power aS mach 1 but less tq and 400lb mo...2 part driveshaft...have fun with your gt selection for 05...special production wont be to 06

 

SVTdriver

Founding Member

Sep 2, 2001

3,319

0

0

Seattle Wa

Dec 6, 2003

#12

• Dec 6, 2003

• #12

So you have absolutely factual and credible (from Ford) confirmationon weight, 2 part driveshaft, and hp & torque #'s.? Cool give me source information.

 

Donny

Something about a big schlong...I can't remember.

Founding Member

Feb 10, 2002

669

1

39

The PoorHouse

Dec 6, 2003

#13

• Dec 6, 2003

• #13

i actually like the look of the rear end on those pictures if it is actually the new stang!!!!!!!

It looks a hell of a lot better than the gay looking rear end that was on the concept 05 stang I saw at the 2003 chicago auto show back in febuary!!!!!

Donny

 

The Fireman

New Member

May 9, 2003

148

0

0

Lord of the Piston Rings

Dec 6, 2003

#14

• Dec 6, 2003

• #14

Donny said:

It looks a hell of a lot better than the gay looking rear end that was on the concept 05 stang I saw at the 2003 chicago auto show back in febuary!!!!!

Click to expand...

EXACTLY!!!!!

The rear on the production model is a vast improvement over the concepts. Those taillights were the worst looking things Ford has ever put on a "Mustang".

 

Ruffrider

Founding Member

Mar 15, 2001

1,018

0

0

Citrus Springs, FL

Dec 6, 2003

#15

• Dec 6, 2003

• #15

I think it looks good... all of it. Im going to be waiting for my '06 Cobra though

 

stangii

Founding Member

Aug 27, 1999

356

0

0

Houghton Lake, Michigan

Dec 6, 2003

#16

• Dec 6, 2003

• #16

Omegalock said:

1) Those are old pics
2) They are of the test mule
3) They are allegedly pics of the V6 Stang
4) The GT Stang is stated to look decidedly different from the V6 version.
5) The 3800 lb rumor is far from substaniated.

Click to expand...

Based on the "pre-release" press kit I have seen, that was handed out recently, the rear end on the white car IS the GT rear. The V-6 rear has only one tailpipe and no spoiler.

I'll have to check on the weight, I know it is in there somewhere.

 

oogtdude

Banned

Jun 9, 2002

1,626

0

0

Dec 6, 2003

#17

• Dec 6, 2003

• #17

SVTdriver said:

So you have absolutely factual and credible (from Ford) confirmationon weight, 2 part driveshaft, and hp & torque #'s.? Cool give me source information.

Click to expand...

can you read? it says "rumor "

 

SVTdriver

Founding Member

Sep 2, 2001

3,319

0

0

Seattle Wa

Dec 6, 2003

#18

• Dec 6, 2003

• #18

oogtdude said:

int...the front looks nice and the interior is cool...but thats it! along with 3800lb

i'll keep my 04 mach!

Click to expand...

Where did this one say rumor?

 

oogtdude

Banned

Jun 9, 2002

1,626

0

0

Dec 7, 2003

#19

• Dec 7, 2003

• #19

SVTdriver said:

Where did this one say rumor?

Click to expand...

mach1registry .. angry employee

 

t69r00p69

Founding Member

May 28, 2002

260

0

0

Houston, Tx

Dec 7, 2003

#20

• Dec 7, 2003

• #20

oogtdude said:

mach1registry .. angry employee

Click to expand...

Well funny how you forgot to mention it in your original post