• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

thoughts on a 347 with GT40P heads and GT40 intake.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarSaleenMustan
  • Start date Start date Dec 26, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
San Bernardino California
Dec 28, 2004
#21
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #21
Grn92LX said:
The main difference really is the looks. The GT40 upper 'might' flow a little better than the cobra upper but nothing you'll notice. The RPM would be a good choice for your goals. You'll do over 400 with a s/c fyi.
Click to expand...
I've seen an upper Cobra intake for $150, i contacted the seller about it, what do you think about this?, More of less about how much would a good porting job go for for this intake?, and more importantly would it outflow an out of the box RPM if the Cobra was ported? thanks


 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 28, 2004
#22
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #22
$150 for the upper + the lower + porting + gaskets and the RPM is still cheaper and better for the application. I'd be more conserned with a cam choice rather than an intake choice. What you should do is try and get a 'carb' sticker for an E cam but use a good custom grind cam and lie to the inspector and say its an E cam Do you know anyone that can do "under the table" inspections?
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Dec 28, 2004
#23
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #23
why not get your 302 bored out to a 306, then some nice heads/cam/intake? that would work better than a 347 with low flow products.
 
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
San Bernardino California
Dec 28, 2004
#24
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #24
Grn92LX said:
$150 for the upper + the lower + porting + gaskets and the RPM is still cheaper and better for the application. I'd be more conserned with a cam choice rather than an intake choice. What you should do is try and get a 'carb' sticker for an E cam but use a good custom grind cam and lie to the inspector and say its an E cam Do you know anyone that can do "under the table" inspections?
Click to expand...

the $150 was for both upper and lower, now more or less how much would the porting be?, and again more importantly would a ported Cobra flow the same or better than the RPM?, ideally i'd like to keep it as "Ford" as I can and if it ends up being more or less the same price but i can have an equally/better flowing "Ford" intake i'd take that instead. I know ultimately the RPM would outflow the Cobra intake but again, i'm not looking for 500+ HP, so it wouldnt really matter with this motor. As far as a cam, I do know an "under the table" inspector/smog tech , it'd be nice if I could get it to pass emissions but it doesnt HAVE to.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 28, 2004
#25
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #25
The RPM will crush the cobra on this given set up your planning. I know your not planning 500hp, thats why I didnt recommend a ported victor and afr 225's To port the lower cobra is gonna cost about $150. But your making it harder and harder to acheive your goals. Just spend a little extra and use an RPM or even consider a trickflow track heat which is about $100 less than an RPM. Stick a 75mm tb on it as well.
 
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
San Bernardino California
Dec 28, 2004
#26
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #26
N8Miller said:
why not get your 302 bored out to a 306, then some nice heads/cam/intake? that would work better than a 347 with low flow products.
Click to expand...
because it'd be NA for a while and I feel i'd get a bit more HP out of the 347 than the 306. I know the 347 stroker would be a bit more due to me having to get the crank and rods, but i'd want to get forged rods too so i might as well spend a couple hundred more and increase displacement 41CI by going with the stroker.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
267
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
973
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
751
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?