• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Throttle Body

  • Thread starter Thread starter Garyj92
  • Start date Start date Dec 3, 2017
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
G

Garyj92

New Member
Nov 28, 2017
22
0
1
Dec 3, 2017
#1
  • Dec 3, 2017
  • #1
Hey got a 88 notch vortech superchsrged gt40 conversion. I guess the previous owner has been using a 65 mm motorsports throttle body thinking of upgrading to a 75mm what do you guys think? Is it better staying with the 65 am i making more power this way or is the 75 better. And is it a simple easy instal?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,164
17,858
224
Massachusetts
Dec 4, 2017
#2
  • Dec 4, 2017
  • #2
What intake/heads are on it?
 
G

Garyj92

New Member
Nov 28, 2017
22
0
1
Dec 4, 2017
#3
  • Dec 4, 2017
  • #3
Mustang5L5 said:
What intake/heads are on it?
Click to expand...
Its a gt40 setup
 

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Dec 5, 2017
#4
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #4
I’d personally measure the intake port and match it as close as possible, no point in having a 75mm throttle body bottle necking to the factory 65mm opening in the intake, is it the tubular version? They I believe are 70mm
 

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Dec 5, 2017
#5
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #5
Yes they are an easy swap, you could also port match the opening in the intake if there’s enough to be taken out, if not just stick with the closest size to intake opening
 
G

Garyj92

New Member
Nov 28, 2017
22
0
1
Dec 5, 2017
#6
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #6
dcurtis said:
Yes they are an easy swap, you could also port match the opening in the intake if there’s enough to be taken out, if not just stick with the closest size to intake opening
Click to expand...
Is this even worth getting or? Will i see a difference
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 5, 2017
#7
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #7
No. With forced induction you won't see much if anything. The larger throttle body will make small modulation more difficult as well this impacts drivability. Imho spend money elsewhere
 
Reactions: 2000xp8

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Dec 9, 2017
#8
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #8
Mine is N/A, but going from 65 to a 70mm TB then matching the upper intake, including thinning the bolt hole intrusions and blending back as far as I could, was measurable in increased tire spin and seat of pants feel. It also added a fun Whistle at idle!
 
Reactions: General karthief

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Dec 9, 2017
#9
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #9
It's not worth the trouble.
It's 5mm, which is close to nothing.
Most intakes don't exceed 70 anyway.

And if it's a real gt40 I certainly wouldn't be home porting anything on the upper half.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,164
17,858
224
Massachusetts
Dec 9, 2017
#10
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #10
Somewhat related...

What are the intake openings on the various "GT40" intakes? I know the explorer and gt40 mate to an EGR, but what are the opening sizes?

What size is the cobra opening?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Dec 9, 2017
#11
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #11
I'm pretty sure they are 70mm.
Not 100% positive though.
But I did have a tubular with a 70mm TB that I know I did not port (could have been, but not by me) and it was a match.

Every time we talk about gt40 intakes, I wish I still had mine even though I don't own anything it fits on.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Stroked88

Member
Nov 13, 2005
42
5
18
Dec 9, 2017
#12
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #12
I don't know what everyone thinks of the explorer intake but I like them. I ported mine to my 70mm throttle body and it had plenty of meat left. I've never been a fan of the cobra intake due to the integrated EGR adapter. On the stock intake a 70mm throttle body is a waste of money. You can make the hole bigger but its just a taper and it necks down too small to be worth anything for performance.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,164
17,858
224
Massachusetts
Dec 10, 2017
#13
  • Dec 10, 2017
  • #13
I actually think the explorer is underrated. Sure they are cheap and plentiful (I picked one up for the hell of it) but IIRC they featured a 75mm opening to match the egr spacer and offer the largest upper plenum volume of the three gt40 styles.

Pair it with a ported lower and i believe it would outperform the other two with decent heads. However without a ported lower I feel they are all the same really
 
Reactions: General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,164
17,858
224
Massachusetts
Dec 10, 2017
#14
  • Dec 10, 2017
  • #14
2000xp8 said:
I'm pretty sure they are 70mm.
Click to expand...

I think you are right at least with the cobra.

Taking a peek into my cobra intake through a Explorer 65mm TB I can see a tiny lip, so 70mm makes sense. Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if it was 68mm, it's barely a lip. I'll have to measure next time I have the TB off.



I have a few eBay alerts set to try and snag a cheap 70mm, but it would need to be cheap to be worth the effort.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 10, 2017
#15
  • Dec 10, 2017
  • #15
I have a 75mm pp throttle body sitting on the work bench... doin nothing..


I replaced it with dual 65mm explorer pieces
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Dec 10, 2017
#16
  • Dec 10, 2017
  • #16
WIth the forced induction the TB difference will be negilible.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Dec 16, 2017
#17
  • Dec 16, 2017
  • #17
Somewhere on here was posted the back to back Magazine tests of the Tubular Cobra, the cast Cobra, and the Explorer. In short, the car magazine found very little difference in power between the three.

To quote this publication, "The inlet on a Cobra intake typically measures 65mm."

As did the 97 Explorer I bought (and had tmoss port the lower), and there was plenty of aluminum to open it to 70 mm.
http://www.mustangandfords.com/how-to/engine/173-0101-super/

BTW,
TMoss has a site that anyone thinking about switching intakes should check out. Here is a comparison for one of his ported ones vs a "hot" design.
http://tmoss.efidynotuning.com/GT40 Intake Capabilities2.doc
 

Stroked88

Member
Nov 13, 2005
42
5
18
Dec 16, 2017
#18
  • Dec 16, 2017
  • #18
On my Explorer intake and my 70mm throttle body/EGR spacer I had to port it to get it to the correct 70mm size without restriction. It might be close to 70mm but its definitely not 70mm. I ported it straight in as far as I could reach. Combined with some custom sculpting to get rid of the a/c hose mount on the right front corner of the upper intake I continued the ribs all the way to the front. I think it looks good too. I also had Tmoss port the lower to my TFS heads. Throw on some paint and the stock 5.0 HO plate and it looks stock.


Here are pics of my ports Tmoss Explorer left and stock GT right. While not 1 to 1 I tried to overlay them to show the port size differences on the lowers. I don't have any pics of my throttle body opening to show.

 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,890
21,068
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 16, 2017
#19
  • Dec 16, 2017
  • #19
Mustang5L5 said:
I have a few eBay alerts set to try and snag a cheap 70mm, but it would need to be cheap to be worth the effort.
Click to expand...


You? I know you didn't just turn up yesterday.

At your level of scrutiny and if it were me, it would be a brand spanking new Accufab with a warranty.

a91what said:
I have a 75mm pp throttle body sitting on the work bench... doin nothing..
Click to expand...

That.. is probably why. Over the years, PP throttle bodies have been hit or miss. Most BBK were made by Whistler's Grandmother. I'll never buy another TB for a Fox that isn't an Accufab unless it's something I plan to get rid of.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,164
17,858
224
Massachusetts
Dec 16, 2017
#20
  • Dec 16, 2017
  • #20
Noobz347 said:
You? I know you didn't just turn up yesterday.

At your level of scrutiny and if it were me, it would be a brand spanking new Accufab with a warranty.

of.
Click to expand...

Pretty much. My alert is really for a slightly used Accufab with 2 hours of idle time taken off for something else with a BIN of $50. Hasn't happened
 
Reactions: General karthief and Noobz347
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
712
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
87 fox code 22
  • Showpony87
  • Aug 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
877
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2024
Showpony87
S
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
G
Fuel Stock 1994 5.0 throttle body size
  • GOvert
  • Mar 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 1, 2025
95gt1985
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?