• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Thumper heads vs. gt-40 heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter willys1
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 24, 2004
#1
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #1
Which would be a better head for a stock cammed motor with an aod,and 410 gears? Brand new Thumper heads,or slightly ported and milled gt-40 heads?Everything is new on the gt-40 heads,they have stock size valves,and 545 lift springs.What do ya think??Oh yeah,I will have a t-moss intake.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 24, 2004
#2
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #2
willys1 said:
Which would be a better head for a stock cammed motor with an aod,and 410 gears? Brand new Thumper heads,or slightly ported and milled gt-40 heads?Everything is new on the gt-40 heads,they have stock size valves,and 545 lift springs.What do ya think??Oh yeah,I will have a t-moss intake.
Click to expand...
I forgot,the most important thing to me is every day drivability,and LOW end torque !!!
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 24, 2004
#3
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #3
The gt-40s and the Thumpers will give you awsome DRIVEABILITY.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 24, 2004
#4
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #4
mike keirstead said:
The gt-40s and the Thumpers will give you awsome DRIVEABILITY.
Click to expand...
Thats what Im looking for,but your not aloud in this thread
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 24, 2004
#5
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #5
willys1 said:
Thats what Im looking for,but your not aloud in this thread
Click to expand...


Come on man I will cut you a deal.

No canucks allowed????

Ok I will stay out of your thread.

This is MONTY HALL SIGNING OFF
 

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
Jan 24, 2004
#6
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #6
They'll both help. The 40's have more potential, but if you are never going to tap that potential, shop for the best price. Thumper claims better flow numbers than the stock 40's, and since his heads have smaller runners and valves that means more air velocity.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 24, 2004
#7
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #7
mike keirstead said:
Come on man I will cut you a deal.

No canucks allowed????

Ok I will stay out of your thread.

This is MONTY HALL SIGNING OFF
Click to expand...
LOL,,Talk to ya tomorrow
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 24, 2004
#8
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #8
stock50LX said:
They'll both help. The 40's have more potential, but if you are never going to tap that potential, shop for the best price. Thumper claims better flow numbers than the stock 40's, and since his heads have smaller runners and valves that means more air velocity.
Click to expand...
And thumpers big on air velocity !!!
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jan 24, 2004
#9
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #9
I haven't had GT40's on my car but the Thumper's have larger exaust ports and have been ported correctly. The Thumper's will flow better, make more power, but if you can pick up a set of GT40's cheap, go for it if your on a tight budget. The GT40P's require different headers.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 25, 2004
#10
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #10
90mustangGT said:
I haven't had GT40's on my car but the Thumper's have larger exaust ports and have been ported correctly. The Thumper's will flow better, make more power, but if you can pick up a set of GT40's cheap, go for it if your on a tight budget. The GT40P's require different headers.
Click to expand...


The gt-40s he is talking about have port work also. The cobra gt-40s dont require different headers. And the gt-40 Ps will work with MAC and BBK long tubes for regular heads.
 

TheFleshRocket

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
208
0
16
Southern Ill Annoy
Jan 25, 2004
#11
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #11
willys1 said:
LOL,,Talk to ya tomorrow
Click to expand...

OMG, you guys know each other? I never would have guessed.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 25, 2004
#12
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #12
TheFleshRocket said:
OMG, you guys know each other? I never would have guessed.
Click to expand...


 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Jan 25, 2004
#13
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #13
Hard choice?? If the 40s have been "ported" then the cost is the factor!! and "how " they were ported?? cool?? The 40s have a small high velocity small exhaust port... if opened up without hitting the water jackets.. they will rock!! So, again... cost!!
Still the ported E7s will pull more power unless they were ported the same, cool??
then the cost of preparing the 40s to bolt on... heads flat?? might need surface, or a fresh valve job... blah, blah.. again COST!! Both will tear up the low end, mine my pull a little better thru the full rpm range...due to the high velocity and flow!! and the performance valve job!! I'd bet you'd like either one... again cost!!

Just me...............................

Thumper

Congrats to Steve in OP!! Ran his 90 Hatch to a 12.48 @ 108 yesterday at Gainsville
B cam 4* advanced and thumper Heads!!
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 25, 2004
#14
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #14
TheFleshRocket said:
OMG, you guys know each other? I never would have guessed.
Click to expand...
I know him through this website !! His knowledge about 5.0's kicks a@s!! If I got a question about 5.0 performance,hes the man I go to
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 25, 2004
#15
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #15
Yo Mikee,what Kind Of Porting R We Talking About?
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Jan 25, 2004
#16
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #16
Shoot me an email.. Thumper460@hotmail.com this place only allows a few pics and I think I'm used Up??? LOL

Just me............................

Thumper
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 25, 2004
#17
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #17
Still keeping my mouth shut WILLY.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 25, 2004
#18
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #18
willys1 said:
Yo Mikee,what Kind Of Porting R We Talking About?
Click to expand...

They have just been cleaned up from flash and milled. They do not require the intake to be resurfaced. I just had them flowed Thursday and they went 206 intake and 140 exhaust. I am not sure how extensive the heads are ported. But that is what they flow so it cannot be that much port work. They do not flow as much as the thumpers. They were also just set up with new springs, guides,freeze plugs, and all that stuff.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Jan 25, 2004
#19
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #19
thumper, got a question, as for just taking the e7te's off and having the egr bumps taken out and exhaust side fully ported, and just a regular valve job. and new springs, what hp/torque / flow advantages will ihave over just stock e7te's? (intake side is not messed with)
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Jan 25, 2004
#20
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #20
Just the exhaust is killer on Forced air or N.O.S. ( side note...* I hate the freaking fast and furious !! dam it NOS "IS" Nitrous Oxide Systems... screw the puting in periods, for every one not to rag... he said Naws!!.... are we all together on this???...COOL!!)
On a na engine you need intake !! as the racers know, Heads are important... but it is the CAM!! That is the real wizard!! The 40s are good numbers!! they will allow 12s on the right set up!! cool??

Just me...........................

Thumper
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
852
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Need some advice on upgrading GT-40-X303 heads
  • 93gtmustang
  • Sep 1, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2024
Noobz347
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
Fox 89’ GT 331 stroker, Trickflow upper/lower, TF#3 Cam, stuffed with forged goodies.
  • 08GT500
  • Nov 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
780
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2025
08GT500
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
894
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?