• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Time to upgrade exhaust

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhjo
  • Start date Start date Apr 29, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Apr 29, 2011
#1
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #1
After my AOD swap the H-pipe had to be removed because of placement issue, wich also led me into thinking exhaust again.

My current setup:

Hedman shorty headers
H-pipe (cut off)
2 x Dynomax super turbo
1 x Dynomax super turbo transverse in rear

This setup has worked fine, but it started ticking and popping a lot after the removal of the H-pipe. I also want most hp.

I have been adviced the following:

Get a HiPo manifold instead of the headers
Get rid of the rear muffler and replace with resonators



Any tips / ideas?

( I like it both ways, maximum hp and silent cruising!)
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Apr 29, 2011
#2
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #2
Yeah, you kissed 5-15 hp goodbye when the crosstube was removed.

I got tired of headers years ago, when my 66 was a "driver", and put the 289HP manifolds back on it. Never missed the headers. I suppose a chassis dyno could have found a high-rpm power loss, but the trade off of better ground clearance, less radiating heat, easier to work on the engine, blah-blah-blah, it was a good choice for me.
 

Edster

Founding Member
Aug 13, 2000
500
1
19
League City, Texas
Apr 29, 2011
#3
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #3
Just went w/ a 2 1/2 in exhaust w/ Thrush turbos and I love the growl. I had 2in and noticed i had to rejet the carb richer because of the increase in flow. I currently got Tri Ys. I'm not sure about the difference between those and Hi^po manifolds buy I'm sure its on here somewhere. The Tri-Ys seem to fit better than others as far as working on the engine.
 

JonK

Member
Jun 6, 2007
276
0
16
Nashville (Smyrna), TN
Apr 30, 2011
#4
  • Apr 30, 2011
  • #4
I'd add an H pipe back to the system just to equalize the cylinders, should stop the pop back and I'd try eliminating the 3rd muffler. With super turbos (quiet) already I would think limiting a dual exhaust down to single through 1 muffler would choke the system somewhat.
Jon
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
May 2, 2011
#5
  • May 2, 2011
  • #5
I will keep it dual, but I will relocate and reinstall the H-pipe, maybe replace the headers with Hipo manifiold.

As for removing the rear transverse muffler, I was advised to install resonators instead. What is difference between mufflers and resonators? - and what are resonators for?
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
May 2, 2011
#6
  • May 2, 2011
  • #6
I would definitely put the H pipe back in.

Resonators just smooth out the exhaust tone. I'd keep the dual Superturbos and dump the transverse rear one.

The HiPo manifolds are a great way to go on a stock or mild engine.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
May 4, 2011
#7
  • May 4, 2011
  • #7
The H-pipe crashed with a metal frame on the AOD, so it was removed. Now that I am getting exhaust replasced, a new H-pipe must be made. Should it be placed infront of or behind the frame on the AOD?
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
May 4, 2011
#8
  • May 4, 2011
  • #8
Hi,

The "H" pipe is typically installed just after the header connections. Does this present a problem? I don't run an AOD, so, I don't know the obstructions you are experincing relative to that area.
Happy Trails!
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Jun 1, 2011
#9
  • Jun 1, 2011
  • #9
The AOD 'crashed' with a edge on the AOD. I once read that finding the right position for the H-pipe is essensial. Makes me wonder: maybe use 2 H-pipes?

My setup will be as follows; HiPo manifolds, 2" pipes with H-pipe, 2 Dynomax super turbo and rear pipes with resonators.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 2011
#10
  • Jun 1, 2011
  • #10
I switched from headers to HP manifolds years ago, not for one moment was I ever sorry. Now, I even have the factory system, with resonators in the tailpipes.
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Jun 8, 2011
#11
  • Jun 8, 2011
  • #11
I don't see any point to 2 H pipes.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Jun 17, 2011
#12
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #12
Ok. Would theese be better than resonators behind rear axle?


Cherry Bomb 87520 - Cherry Bomb Glasspack Mufflers - Overview - SummitRacing.com
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Jun 17, 2011
#13
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #13
Hi
If you are looking for quality resonator muffs, Google "Stainless Works". Then check out P/N TDM25. Although this prticular P/N is for a 2.5" inlet with a 3.5" body, you can order them with a 2.5" inlet with a body of 3.0" body.
These are the "bomb" as far as I'm concerend when it comes to both quality and sound resonance.
Happy Trails!
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Jun 20, 2011
#14
  • Jun 20, 2011
  • #14
I already have the mufflers - I am replacing a rear transverse muffler with resonators or Cherry bombs.
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Jun 27, 2011
#15
  • Jun 27, 2011
  • #15
I wouldn't run the resonators either. The turbo mufflers are mild enough.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Aug 8, 2011
#16
  • Aug 8, 2011
  • #16
Not so happy after all..

We finally got:
- shorty headers off, and HipO manifold on.
- Rear transverse muffler off, and resonators on
- new prefab 2 "H-pipe and tailpipe from NPD

However, we didn't get the mid section pipe in 2" so we used 2.5 "
The H-pipe had to be cut and spiced in order to go clear AOD.
We saw after cutting the crossmember pipe in the H-pipe that the pre made holes in the main pipes where very small (finger wide).

So, the exhaust work ok but for a booming "hum" at 50 - 100 hz. It's a bit annoying.

Q1. Is this caused by the lack of flow in H-pipe crossmember pipe?
Q2. Or is it because we use wider pipes between H-pipe to rear mufflers?


I haven't noticed any performance gain after the exhaust swap. I find it strange since I reintroduced H-pipe and removed transverse muffler....
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Aug 8, 2011
#17
  • Aug 8, 2011
  • #17
I don't think its from the different diameter mid pipes or the H pipe. I can't believe that your having noise issue with Dynomax turbo mufflers and resonators. I know alot of people that have them with out resonators and they are pretty quiet. Are you sure they are turbo mufflers and not one of thier other lines?
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Aug 8, 2011
#18
  • Aug 8, 2011
  • #18
Yes I am very sure.

I am picky.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Aug 11, 2011
#19
  • Aug 11, 2011
  • #19
Update

We will replace the two Dynomax super turbos with the new 'drone free' VT's

Also we will cut off the H-pipe, enlarge the (small) holes in the main tubes, and make a H-pipe with an oval 2,5" pipe.

Our theory (partly made from advise from members of this forum) is that this will provide a optimum performance/low noise combination:

HiPo manifolds, wide H-pipe, Dynomax VT mufflers + straight through resonators.

I will post the results.
 

chepsk8

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2001
2,203
3
49
Easton, PA
Aug 11, 2011
#20
  • Aug 11, 2011
  • #20
I did the AOD swap in the 69 Ragtop a few years back.

Many have asked why the stock "H" won't fit, and the reason is the AOD is a much bigger case size, and the stock "H" hipe will not go around it. I had the same problem, I just ran true duals, no "H" connection between the sides, with quiet Turbos, it was fine.

When introducing a cross-over, it will change the tone of the exhaust. That is why you hear any modified 5.0 with an "X" cross-over, it has that distinctive rasp. But, having the cross-over does, or is supposed to aid performance by better scavenging and exhaust pulses. Most likely, the size and location are critical, but I do not know much more on that subject.

Like the others, I suggest a second "muffling" is redundant and not needed.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
1986 Convertable 5.0 GT
  • eneerg
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
241
The Welcome Wagon Sep 24, 2025
Noobz347
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
551
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
T
For Sale 1990 GT Convertible Resto-mod
  • teneck83
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
383
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 19, 2025
teneck83
T
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
291
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
399
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?