• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Tire Size?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zZsKyZz
  • Start date Start date Mar 31, 2006
Z

zZsKyZz

Member
Dec 1, 2005
503
0
17
Mar 31, 2006
#1
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #1
I have a set of 17x9 rims and I'll be getting a set of tires [Probably toyo T1S's] and need some help deciding on a size, what is the stock size, what are the advantages of going up one size and down one size?

Anyone care to chime in? Thanks.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Mar 31, 2006
#2
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #2
1. Good tires - I have them. They don't make the T1-Ss anymore, at least I couldn't get them. They are now T1-Rs, and they were actually less expensive than the T1-Ss were.

2. Stock is 17x8 with 245/45s. That works out to a diameter of 25.6811 inches (785.33 revs per mile). With 9s, you can go up to 285 in the back and 255 in the front (that is what I have). If I had 17x9s, I'd do 285/40s if I could get them. That would keep the diameter close at 25.9764 inches (776.40 revs per mile). Your speedo and odometer might be a little off, but not far enough to matter.

No snow: wider = more traction.
Snow: wider = less traction.

Also, in general, the thicker the sidewall, the more traction, but the more flex when cornering.

When I get new tires for the back, I am getting 285/40s ...
 
Z

zZsKyZz

Member
Dec 1, 2005
503
0
17
Mar 31, 2006
#3
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #3
BlackVert said:
1. Good tires - I have them. They don't make the T1-Ss anymore, at least I couldn't get them. They are now T1-Rs, and they were actually less expensive than the T1-Ss were.

2. Stock is 17x8 with 245/45s. That works out to a diameter of 25.6811 inches (785.33 revs per mile). With 9s, you can go up to 285 in the back and 255 in the front (that is what I have). If I had 17x9s, I'd do 285/40s if I could get them. That would keep the diameter close at 25.9764 inches (776.40 revs per mile). Your speedo and odometer might be a little off, but not far enough to matter.

No snow: wider = more traction.
Snow: wider = less traction.

Also, in general, the thicker the sidewall, the more traction, but the more flex when cornering.

When I get new tires for the back, I am getting 285/40s ...
Click to expand...

Well, I'd like to keep a tire that is the same size all round. I think it'd be the best idea for handling, but I also want a tire that will have good traction and launch well during the summer. So you think a 285/40/17 would do well or should I go for a 45 if possible?
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Mar 31, 2006
#4
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #4
zZsKyZz said:
Well, I'd like to keep a tire that is the same size all round. I think it'd be the best idea for handling, but I also want a tire that will have good traction and launch well during the summer. So you think a 285/40/17 would do well or should I go for a 45 if possible?
Click to expand...
i think 285 is too wide for front tires. imo, it would not look right

if you want the same tires all around, i'd say go with 255/45s or 265/40s max
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Mar 31, 2006
#5
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #5
zZsKyZz said:
Well, I'd like to keep a tire that is the same size all round. I think it'd be the best idea for handling, but I also want a tire that will have good traction and launch well during the summer. So you think a 285/40/17 would do well or should I go for a 45 if possible?
Click to expand...
40 series are fine. I run 275/40/17's all around.

They look good, but the fronts rub on the swaybar at wheel lock a bit. I'm planning on putting some rack limiters in to prevent that.

285's would probably rub even worse.
 
Z

zZsKyZz

Member
Dec 1, 2005
503
0
17
Mar 31, 2006
#6
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #6
Is there a plus to running 285's out back? More traction, right? Would they fit correctly? What are the downfalls to running that big of a tire?
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Mar 31, 2006
#7
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #7
zZsKyZz said:
Is there a plus to running 285's out back? More traction, right? Would they fit correctly? What are the downfalls to running that big of a tire?
Click to expand...
i've been running 285 out back for 2 1/2 years now. they are still going strong.

some people run 315s out back, on wider rims of course.

the only downside i know of is that there is less traction in the snow.
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
Mar 31, 2006
#8
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #8
Is there a plus to running 285's out back? More traction, right? Would they fit correctly? What are the downfalls to running that big of a tire?
Click to expand...

Wider tires in the back obviously gives you better drag racing traction...however, wider tires in the back as compared to the front will negatively effect your car's handling. Your car will understeer much more into corners.

For a street car, equally sized tires on all four corners will probably give you the best blend of traction and handling. 275/40/17 on all corner would give you great handling and great traction. If your drag racing though, you don't want that big 275 series tire on the front though...

In short, it all depends on your goals. Personally, I run 275/40/17 drag radials on the back and 245/45/17 all seasons on the front, and at the track I switch to the stock 225/55/16s for weight and rolling resistance.
 

mricci

Member
Aug 17, 2003
301
0
17
Massachusetts
Mar 31, 2006
#9
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #9
i thought 275 was the widest you should go on a 9" rim? If i had known you could put 285s i would have gotten them when i got my new tires a month ago. I have 275 in the rear and 245 up front but will be putting 255 in the front this summer.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Mar 31, 2006
#10
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #10
mricci said:
i thought 275 was the widest you should go on a 9" rim? If i had known you could put 285s i would have gotten them when i got my new tires a month ago. I have 275 in the rear and 245 up front but will be putting 255 in the front this summer.
Click to expand...
i have had 285s for 2+ years now, no problems
 

chefster

New Member
May 24, 2004
426
1
0
michigan
Apr 2, 2006
#11
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #11
275s up front don't last long,too wide for all the angles
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Apr 2, 2006
#12
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #12
you can go all the way up to 295s on a 9 inch wheel, but not recommended...it bulges too much and is almost impossible to actually get the tire onto the rim...285 is the safest route to go if you want to go balls deep into fat rubber

I run 275's all the way around on my car, and I think it looks perfect..

keep in mind, zZsKyZz, that going the same route as me will leave your front tires sticking out wider than your rear tires, I resolved that with spacers...which is a whole different topic.

My recommendation for you, go with 275's on the rear, and 255's up front...it's a good combo that works well in any situation
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Apr 2, 2006
#13
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #13
i run 275/40/17's up front and have no rubbing problems but I do have the 03 cobra control arms. I don't think they look too big for the front eitherl. I'd go with 275's all around if your running 9's. I run a 315/35/17 in the back because I have 10.5" rims.
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Apr 2, 2006
#14
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #14
double post...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
246
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
224
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2026
Qtrhrse23
D
Will 2023 (Non-Handling Pack) Mach 1 Wheels Fit A 2013 Mustang GT OK?
  • dmw_4814
  • Oct 27, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
101
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Oct 27, 2026
dmw_4814
D
S
Progress Thread Hello from Nashua, NH
  • sevenup
  • Oct 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
185
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2026
sevenup
S
5
New to this
  • 5.ohCS
  • Nov 1, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
92
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2026
5.ohCS
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?