• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

TKO 600 and bellhousing indexing - Is it necessary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike92GT
  • Start date Start date Jun 25, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

Mike92GT

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
583
0
0
Florida
Jun 25, 2006
#1
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #1
I read an article on how to do it, but it seems to apply more to scattershields. I'm just using the stock-style Ford aluminum bellhousing. How many of you checked the run-out on yours? Any issues? I noticed that my TKO had some vibration in the shifter after the install, not real bad. I don't know what's normal though, so I'm trying to explore all the possibilities. Anyone else notice some shaking in the shifter handle?
 
B

blue302stang

New Member
Jan 23, 2006
61
0
0
Jun 25, 2006
#2
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #2
Not sure on the whole bellhousing indexing thing, but there is always going to be shaking in the handle. My stock T5 handle shakes
 
M

mat50ho

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
128
0
0
EGF, Minnesota
Jun 25, 2006
#3
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #3
Yes it is.
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=576980
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jun 25, 2006
#4
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #4
I have never heard of indexing a cast aluminum bellhousing before. I have always heard that it is needed with scattershield bellhousings because of the manufacturing process used to make them.

I personally have had the cast aluminum bellhousing on & off two times and have never had the need to do anything with the alignment. I have no unusual virbrations in my Tremec 3550. I do have a FMS aluminum driveshaft, so that may help.
 

rdharper02

like kicking myself in the junk
10 Year Member
May 8, 2006
703
237
84
Jun 25, 2006
#5
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #5
Yep, you will experience more vibration (than usual) and possibly driveline/tranny failure. Most retailers will suggest that you index, but will not come out and say its a must. Good luck. JRichker is probably right (normally always), but I think a 2200 dollar trany set-up is worth the extra trouble.
 
M

mat50ho

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
128
0
0
EGF, Minnesota
Jun 25, 2006
#6
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #6
Are you using a stock drive shaft ?

If so an aluminum will take away form vibration ?

Try flipping your drive shaft 180 to see if it helps ?

I chased a vibration for weeks fms al drive shaft fixed it .
 

tunedin302

I AM the law!!!
Jul 29, 2004
1,251
2
36
Pennsylvania
Jun 25, 2006
#7
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #7
I have a tko and a mcleod scattershield (same as FMS) and was told that indexing is not required on the mcleod scattershield by mcleod and d&d. Mine came with a sticker on top saying it had been centered. The lakewoods do require indexing. Never heard of a non-scattershield bell requiring indexing.
 
M

Mike92GT

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
583
0
0
Florida
Jun 25, 2006
#8
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #8
Yeah, I have an aluminum driveshaft. I even had the balance checked after replacing the yoke. I have the motor and trans out of my car at the moment, so I figured it would be a good time to index if it is actually needed
 
M

Mike92GT

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
583
0
0
Florida
Jun 25, 2006
#9
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #9
Did anyone notice whether or not their TKO shifter handle had more vibration in it then their T5? I'm not even sure if I'm getting a vibration, or if it's just normal. It didn't get any worse with speed or RPM
 
B

blackcloud50

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
388
0
0
Jun 25, 2006
#10
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #10
tunedin302 said:
I have a tko and a mcleod scattershield (same as FMS) and was told that indexing is not required on the mcleod scattershield by mcleod and d&d. Mine came with a sticker on top saying it had been centered. The lakewoods do require indexing. Never heard of a non-scattershield bell requiring indexing.
Click to expand...

Yep...same here
 

tunedin302

I AM the law!!!
Jul 29, 2004
1,251
2
36
Pennsylvania
Jun 26, 2006
#11
  • Jun 26, 2006
  • #11
Mike92GT said:
Did anyone notice whether or not their TKO shifter handle had more vibration in it then their T5?
Click to expand...

Definately, the TKO is much louder than the T5. At certain RPM's it sounds like a nut grinder. Apparently, this is normal.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Jun 26, 2006
#12
  • Jun 26, 2006
  • #12
the only time I have seen it needed on stock bell's is where the engine as been alined bored/honed excessibly (everytime you do that it moves the crank higher in the block), but as said before it never hurts to check, expecialy if you are swapping random parts around.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Jun 26, 2006
#13
  • Jun 26, 2006
  • #13
tunedin302 said:
I have a tko and a mcleod scattershield (same as FMS) and was told that indexing is not required on the mcleod scattershield by mcleod and d&d. Mine came with a sticker on top saying it had been centered. The lakewoods do require indexing. Never heard of a non-scattershield bell requiring indexing.
Click to expand...
I found that to be such a run-around that it wasn't funny. I got the same deal, tko 600 and the mcleod (M-6392-c???) and I went ahead and threw my dial indicator on it anyway. From all the BS of learning to do it the right way, specs I can spit out is that any steel bellhousing needs .005" or less of runout, aluminum is .015" or less (has more give to it). Well the numbers that I got with the mcleaod were as follows:
....-.001
-.012 +.004 <--- Viewed as a circle obviously
....+.008

It took awhile for me personally to figure it all out but a .007" offset dowel put the final results to the tune of:
....+.003
+.004 +.001
....-.001

I would highly advise indexing it. This doesn't mean that you have to change anything, you are mostly checking runout and correcting IF necessarry. If not, I have heard of some early pilot and input bearing failures as well as premature front seal leaks. Like said though, an aluminum bell has a max permissable runout of .015", steel has .005". I could have probably gotten away with it, but the numbers on the sticker were not what I had coming from my dial indicator....????
 

tunedin302

I AM the law!!!
Jul 29, 2004
1,251
2
36
Pennsylvania
Jun 26, 2006
#14
  • Jun 26, 2006
  • #14
87'GTstang said:
I could have probably gotten away with it, but the numbers on the sticker were not what I had coming from my dial indicator....????
Click to expand...

I had a feeling you were going to say that .... well, next clutch job I know what I'm doing.
 
M

Mike92GT

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
583
0
0
Florida
Jun 26, 2006
#15
  • Jun 26, 2006
  • #15
Those of you that did index yours, can you recommend a good dial indicator set-up for this job? I might go ahead and check mine while it's all apart
 
M

mat50ho

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
128
0
0
EGF, Minnesota
Jun 28, 2006
#16
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #16
Mike did you read my link ? Buy a god quality dial indicator odds are you will use it more than once.

I have a tko and a mcleod scattershield (same as FMS) and was told that indexing is not required on the mcleod scattershield by mcleod and d&d. Mine came with a sticker on top saying it had been centered. The lakewoods do require indexing. Never heard of a non-scattershield bell requiring indexing.
__________________
Just because the hole is centered dosn't mean your dowl pins are correct. I would reccomend that you index the bell housing. I havn't heard of too many people checking it with a dial indicator and it being with in spec. But eveyone gets lucky sometimes. Regardless it is better to check it then assume it is correct.
 
M

Mike92GT

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
583
0
0
Florida
Jun 28, 2006
#17
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #17
Thanks Matt. I'm a little confused on setting up the indicator though. It seems that if the magnetic stand isn't Perfectly centered on the flywheel, you will get a false reading? Or am I mistaken?
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Jun 29, 2006
#18
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #18
tunedin302 said:
Definately, the TKO is much louder than the T5. At certain RPM's it sounds like a nut grinder. Apparently, this is normal.
Click to expand...

Yeah my TKO is a noise machine too. It sounds cool though. You get used to it.
 
M

mat50ho

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
128
0
0
EGF, Minnesota
Jun 29, 2006
#19
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #19
Mike92GT said:
Thanks Matt. I'm a little confused on setting up the indicator though. It seems that if the magnetic stand isn't Perfectly centered on the flywheel, you will get a false reading? Or am I mistaken?
Click to expand...

It does not need to be centered the flywheel and the base with both turn when the engine it turned over by hand.

Btw since you have the motor out index the bell housing now. It wil save alot of time and headache.

Matt
 

Brads Coupe

Sweeeeet!!!
Founding Member
Apr 18, 2000
2,838
0
0
Calgary , Alberta, Canada
Jun 29, 2006
#20
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #20
You definitely want to use some sort of dial indicator. Even the slightest bit out can cause issues with alignment which causes wear on your throwout bearing, miss shifts, vibration, all sorts of stuff.

Trust me. Don't take short cuts, it will bite you in the ass in the end.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
606
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
204
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?