• Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information

to carb or to inject?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88347lx
  • Start date Start date Mar 26, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
8

88347lx

New Member
Feb 26, 2009
5
0
0
oly. wa.
Mar 30, 2009
#21
  • Mar 30, 2009
  • #21
86turbo said:
""That being said, both my father and I, as well as John chose HP Ranch owner John to tune our cars because hes the best. Takes balls to admit as a man someone else is better at something than me.""

Nah, it takes balls to do it yourself and actually read up and learn fundamentals of tuning your car instead of shellin out the coin for someone else to do it. It's not rocket science.

""Yes it is senceless to buy a tunner and then take it to someone to tune it. But if you caint figure it out then what?""

If you can't figure it out then reading might help....god knows there are tons of threads/forums on tuning engines. This is, what I feel, separates the boys from the men. Tuning your own **** is not only cheaper but you feel like you accomplished something....you also learn more about your engine. You just put together an engine, Jon, what makes you think tuning it is so out of reach?

Drew
Click to expand...
it's not out of reach at all, someday maybe i'll be the tuner man...
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Mar 30, 2009
#22
  • Mar 30, 2009
  • #22
86turbo said:
""That being said, both my father and I, as well as John chose HP Ranch owner John to tune our cars because hes the best. Takes balls to admit as a man someone else is better at something than me.""

Nah, it takes balls to do it yourself and actually read up and learn fundamentals of tuning your car instead of shellin out the coin for someone else to do it. It's not rocket science.

""Yes it is senceless to buy a tunner and then take it to someone to tune it. But if you caint figure it out then what?""

If you can't figure it out then reading might help....god knows there are tons of threads/forums on tuning engines. This is, what I feel, separates the boys from the men. Tuning your own **** is not only cheaper but you feel like you accomplished something....you also learn more about your engine. You just put together an engine, Jon, what makes you think tuning it is so out of reach?

Drew
Click to expand...

Well imho I think humility is harder for men than pride. Im my case, its in humility that I go to someone who knows more than I. Also, time is money and in my line of work the $150 I pay to have someone else tune is better/less expensive than the several hours I would have to spend researching. Its all about opportunity cost. For the record, I tuned a buddies turbo 240sx with a standalone Fuel Management so I have experience, but I know I am not as good as John or other tuners.
 

white 89 GT

Member
Apr 3, 2003
281
0
17
Tacoma
Mar 30, 2009
#23
  • Mar 30, 2009
  • #23
I just want to say that if you take it to a pro it will come out better than an average tune which is what you will get by yourself.
 
8

88347lx

New Member
Feb 26, 2009
5
0
0
oly. wa.
Mar 31, 2009
#24
  • Mar 31, 2009
  • #24
fiveohwblow said:
Well imho I think humility is harder for men than pride. Im my case, its in humility that I go to someone who knows more than I. Also, time is money and in my line of work the $150 I pay to have someone else tune is better/less expensive than the several hours I would have to spend researching. Its all about opportunity cost. For the record, I tuned a buddies turbo 240sx with a standalone Fuel Management so I have experience, but I know I am not as good as John or other tuners.
Click to expand...


point taken. thanks
 

gmsux

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
54
0
0
Vancouver, WA.
Apr 1, 2009
#25
  • Apr 1, 2009
  • #25
Go with an SDS system and tune it yourself on a dyno and cross reference results with egt's. Once you know that, the rest is easy and way more powerful than a maf setup....
 

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
Apr 2, 2009
#26
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #26
I see most issues have been addressed already and that you've made your decision. I would just footnote this debate by adding that the closer the car comes to being a race car, the better-off you are with a carb -unless money is no object. The closer it is to being a street car, the better off you are with EFI. If the car is a daily driver, EFI is a clear choice.
 
8

88347lx

New Member
Feb 26, 2009
5
0
0
oly. wa.
Apr 2, 2009
#27
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #27
SWS ? you'll have to explain that to me , i've never been involved with performance injection before. just getting started but want to do it right..
 
8

88347lx

New Member
Feb 26, 2009
5
0
0
oly. wa.
Apr 2, 2009
#28
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #28
sds?
 
8

88347lx

New Member
Feb 26, 2009
5
0
0
oly. wa.
Apr 2, 2009
#29
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #29
oh sds. hmmm
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Apr 3, 2009
#30
  • Apr 3, 2009
  • #30
86turbo said:
""That being said, both my father and I, as well as John chose HP Ranch owner John to tune our cars because hes the best. Takes balls to admit as a man someone else is better at something than me.""

Nah, it takes balls to do it yourself and actually read up and learn fundamentals of tuning your car instead of shellin out the coin for someone else to do it. It's not rocket science.

""Yes it is senceless to buy a tunner and then take it to someone to tune it. But if you caint figure it out then what?""

If you can't figure it out then reading might help....god knows there are tons of threads/forums on tuning engines. This is, what I feel, separates the boys from the men. Tuning your own **** is not only cheaper but you feel like you accomplished something....you also learn more about your engine. You just put together an engine, Jon, what makes you think tuning it is so out of reach?

Drew
Click to expand...

As for now i would need the SCT program lap top i probably wouldnt know what to set stuff at once i got into the chip (never seen what one looks like) plus i paid $50 for my base tune and it's feels about 90% right so i feel i'll have another $75 into dyno time. so for now $125 for a tune is cheaper then the soft ware and a lap top and all the time i would have on the dyno trying to figure it out myself.peace







john
 
8

88347lx

New Member
Feb 26, 2009
5
0
0
oly. wa.
Apr 3, 2009
#31
  • Apr 3, 2009
  • #31
?

SMOKEDYA said:
As for now i would need the SCT program lap top i probably wouldnt know what to set stuff at once i got into the chip (never seen what one looks like) plus i paid $50 for my base tune and it's feels about 90% right so i feel i'll have another $75 into dyno time. so for now $125 for a tune is cheaper then the soft ware and a lap top and all the time i would have on the dyno trying to figure it out myself.peace







john
Click to expand...
what tuner do you have?
 

gmsux

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
54
0
0
Vancouver, WA.
Apr 4, 2009
#32
  • Apr 4, 2009
  • #32
Nope. programmable efi will outperform carbs on the track too with no between round tuning and the other benefits intrinsic w/efi coupled with fine and clearly defined tuning.

no 1 1/2 turns from here and drill out this jet to that and blah blah blah.....

stock50LX said:
I see most issues have been addressed already and that you've made your decision. I would just footnote this debate by adding that the closer the car comes to being a race car, the better-off you are with a carb -unless money is no object. The closer it is to being a street car, the better off you are with EFI. If the car is a daily driver, EFI is a clear choice.
Click to expand...
 

gmsux

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
54
0
0
Vancouver, WA.
Apr 4, 2009
#33
  • Apr 4, 2009
  • #33
Yep, Simple Digital Systems, been around long time. Systems are usually misunderstood as evidenced by the "magical tuner" theories. All a good tune is is the right A/F first and then timing comensurate with the engine and conditions. There are elements of idle/cold start/accel ramp/etc. but those are not difficult either. For a very functional, consistent, and repeatable system with absolutely killer throttle response look no further.


88347lx said:
oh sds. hmmm
Click to expand...
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 4, 2009
#34
  • Apr 4, 2009
  • #34
I know I am coming in a little late, but I wanted to offer a couple of ideas that I didn't see mentioned yet...

The QuarterHorse has been release by Moates.
In my opinion, this is the best value in tuning stock efi out there.
The only thing the tweecer can brag about now is the multiple tune switches.

The QH allows you to make changes to the tune WHILE THE ENGINE IS RUNNING. Tweecer can't do that.
The QH has WAY more datalogging capabilities. More than most of us will know how to take advantage of.
QH is less than half the price of a tweecer: $250

Here is a link to the QH from Moates...
QuarterHorse for Fords [QH1] - $249.00 : Moates.Net


There are some really good tuning sites out there.
EECTuning.org is definitely the best for eec-iv stuff...
EECTuning.org • Index page

I have some beginners info at SeattleBlueOvals...
Login
(this is still a work in progress though)

There is also some info here on stangnet...
Fox 5.0 Tuning - Mustang Forums at StangNet

Good luck,
jason
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Car bucks
  • 91stangman
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
242
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2026
Mindseye007
Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
84
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2026
SchwarzStock
Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
97
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
Engine Tuning...?
  • justadude07
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
214
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
Blown88GT
M
1985 v6 to v8 carb swap
  • mgriffin_2222
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 9, 2026
mgriffin_2222
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?