• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Too much carb for my car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samuraichamploo
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 24, 2004
#1
  • May 24, 2004
  • #1
I have the carb listed in my sig, but have not yet installed it as my veichle is currently in a rebuild.
Is that going to be too much carb for this car? will it run with that setup, while maybe taking a 5-10 hp loss, or will it not run at all????

for the lazy people my setup is a holley double pumper 750 carb w/ mechanical 2nds with a edelbrock airgap rpm intake
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 24, 2004
#2
  • May 24, 2004
  • #2
anyone???
 

Juiced88Coupe

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2001
367
0
0
Austin, Texas
May 24, 2004
#3
  • May 24, 2004
  • #3
IMO that 750 is tooooo big for a basically stock 306 with no power adder or anything like that, My buddy is running a 650 with mods like yours and it runs like hell.

Matt
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 24, 2004
#4
  • May 24, 2004
  • #4
Do you think it will create problems?
 

66Camaro454

New Member
May 22, 2004
25
0
0
May 24, 2004
#5
  • May 24, 2004
  • #5
u wont have a problem im runing an 1150 on my 650hp n/a 454 carb as 50cc injectors too, carb is good for 2000hp
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 24, 2004
#6
  • May 24, 2004
  • #6
I moreso meant, since its a small block, am I going to flood it or foul the plugs?
If I lose 5-10 HP becuase its too big, thats fine. If It bogs the car, and loses 50hp Thats not OK.
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 24, 2004
#7
  • May 24, 2004
  • #7
again, anyone???
 

cqstang

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
70
0
0
May 25, 2004
#8
  • May 25, 2004
  • #8
do your heads have any port work done?
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
May 25, 2004
#9
  • May 25, 2004
  • #9
I would think you might be able to tune it to run ok, might really hurt the bottom end though. ???
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 25, 2004
#10
  • May 25, 2004
  • #10
no headwork, and how much 'hurting' we talking here?
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 25, 2004
#11
  • May 25, 2004
  • #11
like, serious serious bottom end losses?
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
May 25, 2004
#12
  • May 25, 2004
  • #12
saltymaz said:
like, serious serious bottom end losses?
Click to expand...

I don't really know -- it might be able to be tuned out by someone who knows what they're doing -- but it's a pretty big carb for a small engine. I ran a 650 on a 302 with Edelbrock RPM heads and intake with a little work done to them and the bottom end wasn't the greatest, so I would think with a somewhat similar setup, an extra 100 cfm might hurt down low. I'm sure up top you'll really nice -- I suppose it all depends on the tuning.
 

393Bird

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2002
244
0
0
Clarksville Tennessee
May 25, 2004
#13
  • May 25, 2004
  • #13
I would have selected a 650 DP, or a 750 with vac secondaries. You can get by with a oversized carb with vac seconds a lot easier, since if the engine is not pulling enough vac to need them opened, they will not open. You may be able to put a 650 throttle plate on it to band aid it if needed.

Contact Quickfuel at 270-793-0900 and ask for Marvin. He will tell you if this will work. If not, maybe work out a swap. Good luck.
 

66Camaro454

New Member
May 22, 2004
25
0
0
May 25, 2004
#14
  • May 25, 2004
  • #14
get a carb spacer, and tune it right ull get away with it, might want tog et a fuel preasure regulator and run it a lil lean but thats experimental use it on ur own risk
 
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
May 25, 2004
#15
  • May 25, 2004
  • #15
Who is this camaro guy? Do you know anything about cars or are you on here to try and sabotage as many mustangs as you can with your crappy tech advice?? What the hell are 50cc injectors?? Sure you dont mean 50cc accelerator pumps. And pump size is only to cure the lean condition created by a slow reacting fuel system in the carb as you quickly pump the gas. It has really nothing to do with the overall rich or lean condition in an engine. And a fuel pressure regulator will never lean out your carb. All it will do is stop gas from filling up the bowls correctly, and then you run out of gas when you floor it.
As for your carb its too large. Use a 600-650 carb. I'm pushing 625 horses at the flywheel and I'm only using a 700. A 750 has larger venturis which means your engine needs to try harder to suck enough air past the boosters to get fuel to be sucked out of the bowls, through the carb, and into the engine. This is the reason a larger carb runs great at higher rpms, but runs like crap at lower rpms. Will it run? Yes, but the streetablility wont be great, and unless your a really good tuner, you will have off idle stumble, and bad gas mileage. Being a DP makes things worse because its going to pump gas in your engine whether it wants it or not. \ /
/ \ That is what the carb venturis are shaped like. Its this shape that creates a vacumm as your engine draws air through the carb. Its this vacuum that makes fuel move through the carb. Its like sucking through a straw, I'm sure you can move a lot of soda through one straw, but try sucking soda through a hose or pipe. Harder isnt it? If your engine cant move enough air through the carb to extract gas then it wont run correctly in the low rpms and you may backfire through the carb or hesitate due to running lean. The good news is you are in better shape because you have a manual, but this only helps in drag racing because you can sit there revving it before dumping the clutch, but low idle cruising will create a problem. Go to a smaller carb. Hope this helps.
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 25, 2004
#16
  • May 25, 2004
  • #16
cc's are some sort of import term for size of injectors.
Instead of pounds per hour they use cc's.
And i wasnt gonna follow that guys advice, im not retartded lol.
But yeah, anyone want to trade a 750 double pumper with mechanical secondaries for a 650?
 
9

92Frankenstein

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
223
0
0
Minnesota
May 25, 2004
#17
  • May 25, 2004
  • #17
Hmm, I have a 600 CFM single pumper, not sure if that is anywhere near what you are looking for, I also have a 570 I beleive double pumper...
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 25, 2004
#18
  • May 25, 2004
  • #18
well, what would be the ideal match fr my setup?
 

79dog

Founding Member
Oct 26, 2002
1,046
0
37
Sunny Fl.
May 25, 2004
#19
  • May 25, 2004
  • #19
Quote by cqstang,
TrickFlow Trac-Heat Twisted Wedge Heads
Click to expand...
Do they really need port work?
saltymaz, I would think the better choose would have been a 750 (3310) with sec vac's. JMO......
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 25, 2004
#20
  • May 25, 2004
  • #20
what exact difference is it going to make?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
792
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
260
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
282
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?