• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Trick Flow Stage 1 cam..

  • Thread starter Thread starter 66Stangs93
  • Start date Start date Jun 5, 2004
6

66Stangs93

New Member
May 26, 2004
9
0
0
Boston
Jun 5, 2004
#1
  • Jun 5, 2004
  • #1
Will the TF stage 1 cam work on a 93 AOD or is the e 303 cam better? Thanks!
 

houstonstangguy

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2002
979
0
0
Houston, Texas
Jun 5, 2004
#2
  • Jun 5, 2004
  • #2
sure it will work with a 93 aod, but what other mods do you have? a cam first isnt such a good choice. if you have other mods then i would take the stage 1 over the e cam personally.
 
6

66Stangs93

New Member
May 26, 2004
9
0
0
Boston
Jun 5, 2004
#3
  • Jun 5, 2004
  • #3
I am thinking on doing the entire trick flow package. Street heat intake, twisted wedge head and the stage one cam. That will work better than the e 303 cam ?
 

Ourobos

Member
Apr 12, 2004
260
1
17
Jun 6, 2004
#4
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #4
Certainly would. Exhaust lift is more on the TFS, and duration is greater. A really good cam IMHO.
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Jun 6, 2004
#5
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #5
66Stangs93 said:
I am thinking on doing the entire trick flow package. Street heat intake, twisted wedge head and the stage one cam. That will work better than the e 303 cam ?
Click to expand...
everything is better than a e 303 cam. that is like 20 year old technology.
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Jun 7, 2004
#6
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #6
Do you have a stall convertor? If not the car will be a dog.
 

iwannarace67

New Member
Sep 24, 2001
210
0
0
Chicago, IL
Jun 7, 2004
#7
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #7
I was considering the same set up. How do you suppose the cam and intake would work together without the heads? Would it make power or would I need the heads to get anything significant?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jun 7, 2004
#8
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #8
The E303 was designed by Crane and is identical to Crane's PowerMax 2040. Check Crane's website out for their recommendations on use of the cam. They recommend against using it with an automatic. If you insist -- with either cam -- much more rear gear (at least 3.73, preferably 4.10) and looser stall converter will help deal with the loss of low end torque.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
N/A build on fresh stock 302
  • djcarrot
  • Oct 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
416
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
keel
F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
468
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
506
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
Engine Valvetrain Calibration
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
468
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?