• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Trick Flow vs Canfield Heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter fasttback
  • Start date Start date Sep 6, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Sep 7, 2006
#21
  • Sep 7, 2006
  • #21
57fairlane said:
How would you know that without knowing the valve timing events?


I would go with Canfield 195s and I would second the custom-ground cam. Why would you spend $2000 on heads but skimp $100 on a cam. Jay Allen runs a set of a custom cam and the 195s with the valve springs you need for ~$1400
Click to expand...

Good advice. I did want a little more duration on my current cam. Forgot about custom...I will look into it more.
 
B

brin0357

New Member
Jan 26, 2006
169
0
0
Sep 7, 2006
#22
  • Sep 7, 2006
  • #22
Heat is power is heat .
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Sep 7, 2006
#23
  • Sep 7, 2006
  • #23
brianj5600 said:
I disagree. I have taken the early 351 head route. By the time you leave the machine shop, you will be nearing the price of aftermarket stuff w/o porting. You need new valves, guides, seats, seals, studs, guide plates, springs, retainers, and locks. Machine work adds up too. Magnafluxing, cut for larger valves, hardened seats installed, milling for studs and guide plates, tapping for studs, valve job all add up. When all is said and done you have an expensive head that is not as good as an AFR or other top head.
Click to expand...

If you are buying aluminum heads, you should buy the unassembled kind, right? If you're buying a engine shop's heads, they'll have put the best stuff in there already, correct? Bare SBF aluminum heads are around $1000, early 351 heads can be had for under $100, so we're at a $900 difference. Machine work for each is basically the same price, so based on that, a set of iron heads would be around $800 cheaper, right?

Let's just agree to disagree. I agree that, each set of heads done, the aluminum ones will be worth more if you want to sell and more people will be apt to purchase them. But there are guys running 'stock' parts in NHRA Stock that will kick just about anything you can build in the butt. And they're running Ford heads, not even arftermarket iron heads. There's also the option of buying some used heads, either in aluminum or iron versions. I sold my 351 heads for $600 with 1.6 Ersons and guide plates and they were already studded. The guy is running them on a 347 '89 hatch with N02, AOD and a built rear, but I don't know the gears. He was running 11.70s N/A on a engine built for a power adder and he's happy. They're a 'tweener head for him to get him going until he's ready to step up a bit more, then he'll go aluminum, but they were hella better than the E7 heads he had.

Again, I'm not saying aluminum is bad, but I'd win a bet that over 50% of the people that have aluminum heads on this board don't need them, they're simply bling.
 
B

brin0357

New Member
Jan 26, 2006
169
0
0
Sep 7, 2006
#24
  • Sep 7, 2006
  • #24
I agee I think that money could be better used elsewhere. Set the motor backa few inches, thats gonna have a better effect than dropping 40 pounds off the front end. But to each his own.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Sep 8, 2006
#25
  • Sep 8, 2006
  • #25
57fairlane said:
How would you know that without knowing the valve timing events?


I would go with Canfield 195s and I would second the custom-ground cam. Why would you spend $2000 on heads but skimp $100 on a cam. Jay Allen runs a set of a custom cam and the 195s with the valve springs you need for ~$1400
Click to expand...
I don't know. Those numbers are valve timing events and ground in and don't have alot of overlap. The cam can be advanced or retarded, but those numbers never change. The Jay Allen deal sounds good.
 
M

mikemustang289

Member
Jan 12, 2006
224
0
16
mesa, az
Sep 8, 2006
#26
  • Sep 8, 2006
  • #26
Call Jay, www.camshaftinnovations.com

He'll set you up with a set of canfields and a custom cam with the correct springs for around $1600.

I guarantee you'll be faster than running any cylinder head with your current cam.
 

67Dylan

New Member
May 11, 2006
259
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Sep 8, 2006
#27
  • Sep 8, 2006
  • #27
mikemustang289 said:
I guarantee you'll be faster than running any cylinder head with your current cam.
Click to expand...

Well isn't that the whole point of running a custom? I'll never run an off the shelf cam again... at least in my race cars.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Sep 8, 2006
#28
  • Sep 8, 2006
  • #28
I hate to say it, but "Super stock" or "Factory Stock" guys have more in the motor than some of us in the entire car.

1320stang said:
But there are guys running 'stock' parts in NHRA Stock that will kick just about anything you can build in the butt. And they're running Ford heads, not even arftermarket iron heads.
Click to expand...

I was going to do a (in NMRA events) factory stock car. Basically a 3200lbs
fox-body with a maximum of 311 inches and here are the permitted cylinder heads:

Permitted Cylinder Head List, Parts Number: These are the only permitted cylinder heads and part numbers for competition in this category. If your cylinder head is not on this list, it is prohibited.
1) Stock Ford OEM 5.0 HO Cast Iron Cylinder Heads. (*Deduct 250#)
2) FRPP/SVO GT-40 Cast Iron Cylinder Heads
3) FRPP/SVO GT-40P Cast Iron Cylinder Heads

Camshaft requirements:
Stock lobe 5.0 HO or 4.6L camshaft required. Specified duration, lift, and lobe separation required.
5.0 HO: Camshaft maximum lobe lift is .278”; Minimum lobe lift is .270. Maximum valve lift at the retainer not to exceed .480”.
Lobe duration is checked at the below specified lobe lifts.
Lift Maximum duration
.050” 211
.100” 179
.150” 148
.200” 115
Maximum lobe separation angle – 117 degrees
Minimum lobe separation angle – 115 degrees

And the intake requirements:
1.21c) PERMITTED INTAKE MANIFOLD LIST, PART NUMBERS:
If your intake manifold is not on this list, it is prohibited.
1) Stock OEM Mustang-specific 5.0 EFI Intake – Upper & Lower
5) Ford Explorer – Upper & Lower
6) SVT Cobra EFI – Upper & Lower, PN# M 9424 D51, M 9424 E51

If all I wanted to do was be competitive (lets say 3rd place), at all but 1 NMRA event this year I would at least have to run 12.0s consistently. So add it all up on the handy math calculator and I get for a weight of 3200# and a trap speed of 113, HP of ~360fwhp. If I wanted to win, Shawn Johnson/Jeff Schmell are running 11.70s @ 116, which in the calculator nets me ~390fwhp. Thats about where my 306, with ported Windsor Jr lites, custom cam with much bigger specs than stock, and full exhuast is running (factory stock only allows tubular "shorty" headers).

Tell me there isn't a lot of "hidden" money in these things . . .

I would have run total seal's gapless rings . . . $250
The lightest set of pistons I could afford . . . $600 and up
might as well throw in the lighest rotating assembly . . .
Coatings for piston top/rods/crank . . . $700
Custom cam . . . $350

So just because it has "stock" parts doesn't mean it did not cost more than your motor with aluminum heads and "bling" parts.
 

67GTCOUPE

Founding Member
Dec 20, 2000
653
0
0
Land of Ice and Snow
Sep 8, 2006
#29
  • Sep 8, 2006
  • #29
Do yourself a HUGE favor..............contact Jay Allen at camshaftinnovations.

Jay can get you exactly the heads and cam you need.

He did my cam and got my canfield heads.........and my engine is UNREAL!
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Sep 8, 2006
#30
  • Sep 8, 2006
  • #30
57fairlane said:
I hate to say it, but "Super stock" or "Factory Stock" guys have more in the motor than some of us in the entire car.
Click to expand...

Oh heck yeah, I don't know about it anymore, but in the mid/late 80's it cost just as much to run a Stock car as it did a Pro Stock car. I'm just saying that iron heads can be made to run good. But the whole deal is the combo you put together. Most guys on here don't need heads that flow 312 on the intake side @ .600 lift.
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Sep 8, 2006
#31
  • Sep 8, 2006
  • #31
Looks like there are some satisfied people with Canfields. So, I just finished up a detailed email message to Cam Master Jay at Camshaft Innovations.

Hopefully he will come through for me.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
785
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
P
2018 Rims on 1965 Mustang
  • PsuedoCode
  • Nov 15, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 15, 2021
PsuedoCode
P
Engine Boost vs compression
  • skiwesser11
  • Feb 22, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2019
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?