• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Tried something different today...

  • Thread starter Thread starter '01 Steed
  • Start date Start date May 10, 2008

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 10, 2008
#1
  • May 10, 2008
  • #1
A new twist on an old theme....

Your thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3685.webp
    40.6 KB · Views: 230

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
May 10, 2008
#2
  • May 10, 2008
  • #2
eh
 

mustangfan1990

New Member
Jul 17, 2005
505
1
0
Lenoir, North Carolina
May 10, 2008
#3
  • May 10, 2008
  • #3
ShortThrow50 said:
eh
Click to expand...

yeah eh doesnt look that bad but I think the other way looks better. Maybe its because I am use to seeing it the other way
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 10, 2008
#4
  • May 10, 2008
  • #4
Here's a couple more showing the ease of installation...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3678.webp
    50.3 KB · Views: 198
  • IMG_3680.webp
    63.1 KB · Views: 195

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 10, 2008
#5
  • May 10, 2008
  • #5
still installing
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3681.webp
    61.9 KB · Views: 190

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 10, 2008
#6
  • May 10, 2008
  • #6
I think they'd also look better with a higher quality finish, painted to match.

The S197 pods didn't strike a chord right away either, but now Roush is selling them like hotcakes.
 

Black1987Stang

Active Member
Aug 22, 2004
1,422
0
37
Jersey Shore
May 10, 2008
#7
  • May 10, 2008
  • #7
eh is exactly what I said, but it's a decent idea.
Not bad
 

mr.bubbles

New Member
Oct 5, 2006
0
0
0
Good 'ole Canada eh!
May 10, 2008
#8
  • May 10, 2008
  • #8
Are the vents still functional, do they get good airflow still? If not I think it would just look better to lose the vents and just make it like a normal pod.
 

DNA DOA

Member
Apr 3, 2005
184
0
17
Scappoose
May 10, 2008
#9
  • May 10, 2008
  • #9
Paint to match. Looks good. Not a bad idea.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
May 10, 2008
#10
  • May 10, 2008
  • #10
I kinda like it.
I have the autometer version that leaves the ends for a/c, but without being able to angle them up and down, it's a little annoying.
Now yours won't be able to go left or right. lol.
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 10, 2008
#11
  • May 10, 2008
  • #11
Yes, the vent will flow plenty of air, actually more than the "cage". The cross-sectional area of the openings in this design is approx. twice that of the 'cage'.

Directional control is always the trade-off with the VentPod. There isn't any good way around it unfortunately, not without a complex design, which would make them somewhat unaffordable.

Thanks for the feedback guys! I think I'll "fill" these in a bit and sand on them some to get the finish looking better, and then I'll paint them to match the donor dash I have. I'll repost when that is done to give a better representation. I kind of jumped the gun a bit in my enthusiasm to share. You know how that goes...new toy - share it with all your pals.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,861
224
Massachusetts
May 10, 2008
#12
  • May 10, 2008
  • #12
Eh i dunno.

I mean the craftsmanship is good...but you still have the fact that your gauges are IN the vents. Just something not very clean about that idea.
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 10, 2008
#13
  • May 10, 2008
  • #13
It's not any different than the 'gauge cage', right? I mean, that design has sold thousands upon thousands of units, with little complaints.
This design takes that idea and makes it much simpler. This design doesn't require any chopping or cutting or bolting, etc. for installation. It's just easier.
Truth be told, I think this design is actually cleaner than the gage cage. And, the gauges are angled toward the driver.

I've had the same setup in my '01 since '02, with zero issues.....no fogging or anything of the sort. Here's a pic of that....

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=655171 ...post #3.
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
May 11, 2008
#14
  • May 11, 2008
  • #14
compared to a gauge cage i think those look 'out of place'... looks like good craftsmanship and everything, but just completely out of place.

I like the ingenuity regardless
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,861
224
Massachusetts
May 11, 2008
#15
  • May 11, 2008
  • #15
The difference betwen this and the gauge cage is that these gauges are actually in the registers. With the gauge cage, the gauges just mount in the center and then you have separate registers on the side.
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
May 11, 2008
#16
  • May 11, 2008
  • #16
I'm pretty sure your gauge is still in the air flow with the cage as well. That is to say that the air is blowing on the back of the gauge. I don't think there is any sort of "close-out panel" used with the cage. It's basically a couple of flat plates and brackets. And if I recall correctly, you have to do some cutting and chopping on your existing parts, right?

Regardless, that has no effect on the gauge. The gauge will not fog.
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
May 11, 2008
#17
  • May 11, 2008
  • #17
They look kind of Mickey Mouse to me. Then again, I don't like the gauge cage either, regardless of how many thousands of them have been sold, though I'd buy one of them before these. To me, accessory gauges belong on the A-pillar.
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
May 11, 2008
#18
  • May 11, 2008
  • #18
Looks good to me.

10x Better than the gauge cage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Serpentine ac bracket differences
  • EspaceF1Fan
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
1
Views
91
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 1, 2026
OX1
O
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
145
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
T
  • Locked
Digital Tuning A9l issue or something else
  • Tufgriz
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
262
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2025
Noobz347
I
1994 Cobra - Fuel Pressure Drops Revving at Idle
  • IconicSilverGT500
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
362
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 24, 2026
Mcmahst
Engine Head gasket port matching plus head/intake port alignment
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
447
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 12, 2024
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?