Trying to select the right carb.

T

tikibeast

New Member

Jun 6, 2009

59

0

0

Victorville, Ca

Jun 6, 2009

#1

• Jun 6, 2009

• #1

I recently came across a 1984 GLX Vert cheap, the add says runs, wont pass smog, needs new carb. While I realize there's probably far more to it not passing smog than a carb I would like to know what carb to buy for the car in the event that the rest of the car is in reasonable shape when I go to take a look at it. I've come across a dozen different carbs for the car, manual choke, electronic choke, etc. I'm hoping for find a carb for the car for less than $400, I intend on it being a project car but I don't intend on seeing it become a money pit from day one. Any ideas or advice are very welcome.

 

nunly94gt

Founding Member

Feb 3, 2002

1,595

3

38

Mobile, Al

Jun 6, 2009

#2

• Jun 6, 2009

• #2

If its a manual a mechanical secondary holley double pumper would suffice. 600cfm or so for the size. Choke os personal preference. I like the manual choke because I dont use it anyways.

 

R

Rick James

Member

May 13, 2007

172

3

19

burlington new jersey

Jun 6, 2009

#3

• Jun 6, 2009

• #3

I agree with nunly, 600 or 650 double pumper ,mechanical secondaries.

 

T

tikibeast

New Member

Jun 6, 2009

59

0

0

Victorville, Ca

Jun 6, 2009

#4

• Jun 6, 2009

• #4

It's an automatic and I'm torn between two carbs. A 600, a 650 (both Edelbrock), and a 670 holly...the 650 has a quick tune secondary air valve set up which caught my eye...problem is aside from motorcycles I have little to no experience with carburetors so I really don't know what I'm looking at here or which way to go.



On a side note I know the older 5.0s were dogs, is this a terminal issue or are they easily woken up via cams, exhaust, etc...standard bolt-ons like a later gen fox body.

 

R

Rick James

Member

May 13, 2007

172

3

19

burlington new jersey

Jun 6, 2009

#5

• Jun 6, 2009

• #5

Maybe you would be better off with a fuel injected car?Getting an 84 auto/vert with bolt ons is MAYBE a 15 flat car,far from performance.Especially if your on a tight budget,i would just save for a 87+,its alot better starting point.

 

nunly94gt

Founding Member

Feb 3, 2002

1,595

3

38

Mobile, Al

Jun 7, 2009

#6

• Jun 7, 2009

• #6

Yeah the auto is killing you, the cam is garbage in those cars (flat tappet still in 84 i believe) You could find a motor out of an 87+ car and throw a carb on it and be alot better off.

 

T

tikibeast

New Member

Jun 6, 2009

59

0

0

Victorville, Ca

Jun 7, 2009

#7

• Jun 7, 2009

• #7

Well I'm not opposed to changing the cams, installing a shift kit, etc...but if the car is pretty much a lost cause then I guess I'll be going with the LT1 Trans Am parked next to it. Both are parked on a discount lot for dirt cheap, both run reasonably well, but if the Stang is a lost cause then I'll go with the other one for my project car seeing as the LT1 is a pretty well proven engine. I'll pick up a 87+ for next summer.

 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician

Aug 8, 2003

8,016

1,613

194

NJ

Jun 7, 2009

#8

• Jun 7, 2009

• #8

Not so sure an lt1 is any kind of proven engine, until the LS series of engines came out, 5.0's were owning f bodies daily. There is a reason lt1 cars are dirt cheap, nobody wants them.
Shop around and find an 89 and newer 5.0, probably the best project car in history.