• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Tune question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fast05
  • Start date Start date Jan 18, 2006

Fast05

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
409
1
0
Corpus Christi, TX
Jan 18, 2006
#1
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #1
Right now I am running the diablosport 87 octane performance tune and want to go with the 93 octane tune. Sorry if this sounds like a dumb question, but when I do this, do I need to burn out all the 87 in my tank now and change the tune at the gas station after filling up? I don't have much experience with tuning cars and just don't want anything to break. Thanks in advance.
 

bleedingvayneAD

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
339
0
0
At my computer, duh
Jan 18, 2006
#2
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #2
Just try to get as low as you can. But mixing a couple gallons won't hurt anything. I've done it a couple times and my car is just fine.
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Jan 18, 2006
#3
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #3
yeah just get it low fill with 93 and tune it
 
I

I8URVTEC

New Member
Sep 2, 2004
162
0
0
Jan 19, 2006
#4
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #4
Run it until low then fill it with 93 and tune whenever you want after that. You do not need to tune right at the gas station. You can't harm anything running a higher octane than the tune. The only way you would have a problem would be running a LOWER octane than the tune. Good luck!
 
J

joshman1204

New Member
Oct 4, 2004
118
0
0
Jan 20, 2006
#5
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #5
Fast05 said:
Right now I am running the diablosport 87 octane performance tune and want to go with the 93 octane tune. Sorry if this sounds like a dumb question, but when I do this, do I need to burn out all the 87 in my tank now and change the tune at the gas station after filling up? I don't have much experience with tuning cars and just don't want anything to break. Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...



How do you like the Hurst shifter on your car? I am looking at either the hurst or steeda but cant decide which one.
 
I

I8URVTEC

New Member
Sep 2, 2004
162
0
0
Jan 20, 2006
#6
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #6
I have heard that the Hurst rattles quite a bit. If you get it just make sure to tighten up the linkage real good and it should solve the problem.
 

Fast05

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
409
1
0
Corpus Christi, TX
Jan 21, 2006
#7
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #7
Hurst Shifter

I like the Hurst a lot, shifting takes a littlie more effort than stock, but when I first drove it the 1st to 2nd shift was sooo much shorter I was like Mine hasn't rattled one bit since I installed it in early August, and is no louder than the stock shifter.
 

Bobbo

New Member
Jul 15, 2005
8
0
0
Jan 21, 2006
#8
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #8
Aactually, you should fill er up with high octane, then drive around for a while (10-20 mins), then setup a 93 octane tune...otherwise, lower octane at the bottom of your tank and in the fuel delivery system is stilll 87 and you'll get knock, especially at high rpm.
 

jt14894

Member
Apr 6, 2005
66
3
9
Florida
Jan 24, 2006
#9
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #9
I am thinking about getting a tuner, but I just wanted to know whether using one will throw off the message center and give inaccurate readings on DTE and average MPG.
I heard that it does, but I just wanted to find out from those of you who use them.

Thanks!
 
W

wbr351

New Member
Nov 15, 2005
16
0
0
Sugar Land, Texas
Jan 24, 2006
#10
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #10
I tuned my last week, JLT CAI and 93 octane tune. Made a 400 mile trip this weekend and the MPG, DTE worked just fine. I was really suprised how accurate the gallons consumed was, within 0.5 gallons on a 14 gallon fillup.
 

jt14894

Member
Apr 6, 2005
66
3
9
Florida
Jan 24, 2006
#11
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #11
wbr351 said:
I tuned my last week, JLT CAI and 93 octane tune. Made a 400 mile trip this weekend and the MPG, DTE worked just fine. I was really suprised how accurate the gallons consumed was, within 0.5 gallons on a 14 gallon fillup.
Click to expand...


I was suprised too. At my last fillup, my manual calculations came up to 25.5 MPG while the Info center indicated 25.4 MPG. I can't remember the total gallons, I'll need to check my receipt since I always write it down, but it was pretty close, about .2 or .3.
Most of this was highway driving, about 70%, but I think it was pretty good for a V-8.
Thanks!
 
W

wbr351

New Member
Nov 15, 2005
16
0
0
Sugar Land, Texas
Jan 24, 2006
#12
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #12
WOW, 25 MPG? I averaged about 22 this weekend, but I did average 78 MPH on thr average speed computer. At on point, I was running with two ricers across the Atchafalaya spillway (long bridge) at about 115 MPH for about 6 miles! Not a good way to conserve fuel.

Note: there was no other traffic around, so we were not endangering anyone but ourselves!
 

jt14894

Member
Apr 6, 2005
66
3
9
Florida
Jan 25, 2006
#13
  • Jan 25, 2006
  • #13
wbr351 said:
WOW, 25 MPG? I averaged about 22 this weekend, but I did average 78 MPH on thr average speed computer. At on point, I was running with two ricers across the Atchafalaya spillway (long bridge) at about 115 MPH for about 6 miles! Not a good way to conserve fuel.

Note: there was no other traffic around, so we were not endangering anyone but ourselves!
Click to expand...


True! Going 115MPH is going to waste fuel, but its nice to do it once in a while. The car is built to go fast so have a little fun.
I haven't gone over 100 MPH yet, but one day I will test its limit.
By the way, I checked my receipt and the total gallons was 11.824 while the computer indicated 11.7. It was off by only .124, not bad, but that can be a result of me topping off the tank so it could be a lot closer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
302
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
382
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
284
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
E
Nightmare after tune install!
  • EnemyofTyranny
  • Mar 29, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
444
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 12, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?