• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Turbo Build

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikia
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 7
Next
First Prev 2 of 7 Next Last

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Sep 2, 2014
#21
  • Sep 2, 2014
  • #21
I'm just doing my research/homework now. But if that 76 that you have is making that kind of power then that would be plenty enough. I just like to get all the info I can when I research things like this. Also thins won't even be in the near future for me. But if I can start picking up parts soon, then the cost won't be as hard of a hit all at 1 time. As of now, I'll be using the budget power-adder...nitrous.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Sep 2, 2014
#22
  • Sep 2, 2014
  • #22
76mm is more than enough to make 1000+hp. Also Stangboy if you're planning on a turbo I'd swap to an auto trans.
 
Reactions: MikeH686

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Sep 2, 2014
#23
  • Sep 2, 2014
  • #23
A5literMan said:
76mm is more than enough to make 1000+hp. Also Stangboy if you're planning on a turbo I'd swap to an auto trans.
Click to expand...
A lot of people do that, but I HATE automatics. I would be willing to spend a little extra money to beef-up a T56 before I go to auto....but I know when you get into 4-digit and even high 3-digit hp numbers there are too many weak links in a manual setup. I guess I'm just stubborn.

Sorry for hijacking your thread @Nikia Hopefully the questions I asked answered some of the questions you might have had.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Sep 2, 2014
#24
  • Sep 2, 2014
  • #24
stangboy said:
A lot of people do that, but I HATE automatics. I would be willing to spend a little extra money to beef-up a T56 before I go to auto....but I know when you get into 4-digit and even high 3-digit hp numbers there are too many weak links in a manual setup. I guess I'm just stubborn.

Sorry for hijacking your thread @Nikia Hopefully the questions I asked answered some of the questions you might have had.
Click to expand...
I'm in agreement on the manual trans vs auto. But with a turbo build there quite a few reasons why they do it. They are usually easier to drive/tune/run faster et's/and pretty enjoyable considering you're in boost with no knock off in between shifts. Yes it can be done with a manual but...?! Now with a blower/nitrous-n/a
 
Reactions: stangboy

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Sep 2, 2014
#25
  • Sep 2, 2014
  • #25
I'm gonna throw this out there I've made the switch from manual to auto just for the same reasons that @A5literMan stated, hoping to get both the trans and turbo bought before this winter so I can get it for next spring show in ocean city
 
Reactions: A5literMan
N

Nikia

Member
Aug 31, 2014
31
2
18
Sep 2, 2014
#26
  • Sep 2, 2014
  • #26
no apology needed for "stealing the thread". It's all good reading material. I appreciate everyone's input. I'm getting in way over my head and I know that getting into it. Yes I've driven boosted v8's, even a fox. Id like to make 550 maybe a little more. Should I drop a size in turbo? Afr heads? I can make that switch easy enough. There is 150*** on car. Motors do for a rebuild. New t5 in car, not that matters behind 550hp. I plan on a 2 year build. I guess I could just button up that 331 boost ready run that all summer, save for next winter and make real changes.
 
Reactions: stangboy and MikeH686

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Sep 3, 2014
#27
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • #27
That's what I'm doing this winter is boost winter
 
Reactions: A5literMan and Nikia

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Sep 3, 2014
#28
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • #28
I wish I had the time, I'd love to build custom turbo kits for people. I could probably never compete with the on3 prices though.
 
Reactions: stangboy, A5literMan and Nikia

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Sep 3, 2014
#29
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • #29
It would also take you two years to build each one Scott because your so meticulous lol @RacEoHolic330
 
Reactions: stangboy

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Sep 3, 2014
#30
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • #30
RacEoHolic330 said:
I wish I had the time, I'd love to build custom turbo kits for people. I could probably never compete with the on3 prices though.
Click to expand...
Guarantee it would be better than their crap kit though!
 
Reactions: stangboy and MikeH686

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Sep 3, 2014
#31
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • #31
You can say what you want about on3 it might be crap but mine is 3 yrs old and never had a problem with it....
 
Reactions: f8tlfiveo and MikeH686

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Sep 3, 2014
#32
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • #32
Unfortunately i am thinking about purchasing their kit, I just can't beat that price and will upgrade parts as the years go on
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,038
1,625
194
NJ
Sep 3, 2014
#33
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • #33
Turbo setups should be either custom or high end.
The second you start compromising quality or fit you have already done the idea of a turbo setup an injustice and you really should have just gotten a supercharger instead.
I don't really see the point in setting up a turbo to get you the same power as a $2000 vortech S trim that is 100% reliable and installs in a day.

The last On3 setup i saw fit so bad that a race shop that has a chassis shop on site decided it wasn't cost effective fixing. Says enough for me.
 
Reactions: stangboy

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Sep 3, 2014
#34
  • Sep 3, 2014
  • #34
A friend has the on 3 kit, had a few minor fitment issues but thats all. Had a ponydown hot side a while ago, pretty good quality. If I was to do it again now, I would build it all myself.
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Sep 4, 2014
#35
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #35
Yeah i hear bad stories about fitment but mine fit great...and a few people i know of have there kit also no problems either...Also they did do changes to the kit..depends on what kit they got...mine is like a 2nd generation kit...VS 1st I heard was terrible...
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 4, 2014
#36
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #36
my on3 kit fit just fine. I did chance a few cold pipes mainly to fit my pro tube on and I just didnt like the pipe going to the throttle body. Everything else fit just fine.
 
Reactions: MY 85 GT

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,200
21,377
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 4, 2014
#37
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #37
RacEoHolic330 said:
I wish I had the time, I'd love to build custom turbo kits for people. I could probably never compete with the on3 prices though.
Click to expand...


You're damned right you don't have the time. You're doing my car next, remember? Now get back to work!
 
Reactions: RacEoHolic330, stangboy and A5literMan
N

Nikia

Member
Aug 31, 2014
31
2
18
Sep 5, 2014
#38
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #38
So I am tossing around the idea of going blow threw. Thoughts? I'd rather have injection. But a friend here in town is telling me carb will be much easier to tune and much cheaper.
 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member
Mar 7, 2008
1,852
208
104
New Jersey
Sep 5, 2014
#39
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #39
i would stay Fuel injection IMO on a turbo...
 
Reactions: f8tlfiveo

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Sep 5, 2014
#40
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #40
Stock bottom end with some decent aluminum heads and head studs with a simple intake manifold setup will make well over 500hp and make enough to split the block. Throwing forged parts in a stock block is a waste.
 
Reactions: Nikia
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 7
Next
First Prev 2 of 7 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
991
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
help me understand calibrated maf sensors and injectors
  • stackz
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread Evolution of the 'Hudson Heap' plans (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Jan 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Noobz347
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
302 Engine build questions
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Apr 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2022
LEEDAY Boss
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?