• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Turbo Build

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikia
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
First Prev 7 of 7

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Oct 11, 2014
#121
  • Oct 11, 2014
  • #121
modulistic said:
do they make a decent crate dart longblock I can just order and have shipped up here?

any links? I want like 12psi
Click to expand...
http://www.smedingperformance.com/ford/

My dad had one of their Extreme 347s. It was a turn-key motor but he never had a chance to put it in his 67 mustang that he had. The engine never made it out of the crate before he had to sell it...so I don't know how it ran. They dyno the engine before they ship it to you tho. I think it made like 409hp and over 420 lb/ft of torque. It wasn't earthshattering hp/tq but it was also very conservatively built. It Had Edelbrock Performer RPM heads, Edelbrock Perf. RPM intake and a Holley 750 carb....I think...it might have been a 650.
 
N

Nikia

Member
Aug 31, 2014
31
2
18
Oct 26, 2014
#122
  • Oct 26, 2014
  • #122
well I bringing this thread back to life. Ive tossed my options around and I am going to go the route of buying a short block and building it from there. I want a strong bottom end set up that I can eventually run boost and up to 600hp. http://treperformance.com/i-133556-ford-331-347-performance-short-block.html . Is this a good option? Are there better options? 3000$ with the upgrades and shipped is where I would like to be.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,039
1,625
194
NJ
Oct 26, 2014
#123
  • Oct 26, 2014
  • #123
Here is the thing you are going to have to understand.
Stock blocks no matter how built only put up with 500rwhp. Even that number will eventually get the best of it (i consider 450rwhp a wiser goal), doesn't matter if you use stock internals or the best parts you can buy. Result is still the same.

That $3000 shortblock will do nothing different than a stock shortblock when boosted.
Only difference will be is that when it blows (and it will) you will have a $3000 pile of scrap metal instead of a $500 pile.

The engine you list is a value if you intend on keeping the car NA.
Otherwise you are just wasting a ton of money.

Unless you goto a dart, A4, r302 or boss block, your goal will have to be less than 500rwhp.
This is not an opinion, it is a fact. There isn't some unheard of solution hiding on the internet to be found.
Either lower your goal or raise your budget. Those are your options.
 
Last edited: Oct 26, 2014
Reactions: A5literMan, FastDriver and 85rkyboby
N

Nikia

Member
Aug 31, 2014
31
2
18
Oct 26, 2014
#124
  • Oct 26, 2014
  • #124
okay, i suppose i will shelf the boosted high hp motor idea and open my mind to different paths. I do not want a time bomb. guess i will switch gears. A strong 450 hp small block. what is the best, and economical way to build this motor. High compression N/A, low compression boost? I don't want to run NO2.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Oct 26, 2014
#125
  • Oct 26, 2014
  • #125
On3 turbo,supporting mods,and a tune. Done. 450+ rwhp on your stock 302. Now if you need to replace your current engine i.e it's tired you have choices. You can get a junkyard 5.0,rebuild existing,buy a "new" engine with the turbo,mods,etc. A n/a 450hp stroker is an option but you're not going to get to 450rwhp and talking about a 2500-3000$ shortblock,2000$heads,all the supporting mods,etc etc. 400rwhp is possible. If this is a toy/race car you can go in either direction. Like stated Before all the extras really add up. Fuel system,transmission,tuning equipment, all of it has to be addressed to support/live at those power levels.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,109
2,726
224
Vass, NC
Oct 27, 2014
#126
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #126
after 7 pages, you've got some good stuff in here. check post #116 for my recommendation. If you go turbo, you don't have to go too fancy with the H/C/I setup. The turbo is going to do the heavy lifting for you.
 
Reactions: A5literMan
N

Nikia

Member
Aug 31, 2014
31
2
18
Oct 27, 2014
#127
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #127
My motor is tired. Will need rebuild. How do you check the post number? What is the outline for a turbo build. 302/306, compression numbers. Proper turbo size?
 
N

Nikia

Member
Aug 31, 2014
31
2
18
Oct 27, 2014
#128
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #128
FastDriver said:
Because... money... Blowing up and replacing a stocker is cheap by comparison, and any engine, no matter how stout, is going to blow up if you screw up, a part screws up and throws your tune off, or your tuner screws up. Getting another stock block is cheap and easily replaceable. Plus, you don't get your money back for these things, and you get to have the fun right away instead of sinking many thousands in your motor and driving like a stocker. Anyway, my vote for bang for the buck fun is a 500rwhp 302 stocker with a good HCI and a blower or turbo.
Click to expand...
Is this the post you ment?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,039
1,625
194
NJ
Oct 27, 2014
#129
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #129
My take on it:

If you go NA 347 the best you are probably going to get is around 400rwhp. I've seen between 425rwhp and 450rwhp but that is done by guys that do this for a living.

I don't believe in rebuilding 302's or 306's it's too much money that you get nothing for. That still costs $1000 more than just using an explorer shortblock. So IMO, it's 347 or a used explorer engine. A member even made a post recently about why he shouldn't have built a 306.

If you go the power adder route on stock shortblock, do not rely solely on the power adder to meet your goals. The stock parts are too restrictive and it will take too much boost. The more boost you need the more trouble you will have with things like intake and head gaskets. Get some decent heads, gt40x, edelbrock rpm, tw's, afr 165's, a good street cam and decent intake/tb and you are set.

If you really think there is a future dart build, buy the tw's so you can easily have them cnc'ed (something i've said before) by TEA.

In my time, i've seen 450rwhp reached about as many ways as possible.
I stand by the most cost effective reliable way to do it as a hci setup coupled with a vortech S trim (or whatever model it is now). It's a proven setup and you will have plenty of tech support from people on how to get it setup and running correctly. If that on3 turbo setup goes wrong (and i've only seen it go wrong in person), good luck finding an paying someone to fix it.

My pick if it were me? Get an explorer shortblock, sell off the heads and intake, give it a cam and some TW's and an intake and drive it. Worry about the rest of the engine later while you build up the suspension, brakes, trans and rear. Because 450rwhp will break your trans, show you how mediocre your brakes are, cause your rear to spin one wheel and let you know your suspension is sloppy at best.
 
Last edited: Oct 27, 2014

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,789
6,940
214
SW Houston
Oct 27, 2014
#130
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #130
Why not go to a 351? That's about the only other solution laying between stock and aftermarket block 302 blocks.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,039
1,625
194
NJ
Oct 27, 2014
#131
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #131
The 351 based engine (i say based because i figure the sensible build is a 408 or similar) is a good idea, but still has it's group of hurdles.
Swap parts, better heads (no point in doing a 408 if you are going to use 302 heads) and a ground up build is still going to use up 6 grand maybe more without a power adder, although you could use one later, it just better be something potent and the engine would need to be built with quality parts.

The base 408 from fordstrokers is $3000 and that is literally just the shortblock.
As we have said multiple times here, big numbers aren't cheap no matter how you slice it.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,789
6,940
214
SW Houston
Oct 27, 2014
#132
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #132
You could go that route, but much like the 'revered' JY LS swaps, just as many people are doing the same thing with JY 351s. I think the guy on TTF with the 79 coupe is in the 8s now on a stock shortblock, and has been racing it for a few seasons, not to mention street driving.

Is it wise? probably not, but interesting. A mild setup with decent heads would more than handle what the OP is after.

I'd definitely build a 408 with funds permitting, but a 351/357 would still get the job done if needed. You could always make the argument of "if you are rebuilding it, you may as well stroke it." But recently, I've been a fan of "If it aint broke, don't fix it."

You are definitely correct in saying it has it's own set of hurdles with swap parts, etc.
 
Reactions: A5literMan and Boosted92LX

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Oct 27, 2014
#133
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #133
2000xp8 said:
The 351 based engine (i say based because i figure the sensible build is a 408 or similar) is a good idea, but still has it's group of hurdles.
Swap parts, better heads (no point in doing a 408 if you are going to use 302 heads) and a ground up build is still going to use up 6 grand maybe more without a power adder, although you could use one later, it just better be something potent and the engine would need to be built with quality parts.

The base 408 from fordstrokers is $3000 and that is literally just the shortblock.
As we have said multiple times here, big numbers aren't cheap no matter how you slice it.
Click to expand...
BUT, what you are overlooking is a W will do 800 hp. It doesn't have to be a 408, it could be a 351 with boost and the block will handle it. If you could scratch up some rods crank and pistons, let er rip. You do not have to spend 3k on it, you just have to know how to build an engine.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,039
1,625
194
NJ
Oct 27, 2014
#134
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #134
Boosted92LX said:
BUT, what you are overlooking is a W will do 800 hp. It doesn't have to be a 408, it could be a 351 with boost and the block will handle it. If you could scratch up some rods crank and pistons, let er rip. You do not have to spend 3k on it, you just have to know how to build an engine.
Click to expand...

I'd say most people here aren't qualified to build their own short block. I'd also guess that the ones that do know how to build an engine properly aren't here asking questions about building an engine.

Regardless, stock 351 engines aren't known for putting up with much more power than stock 302, the block does but the internals don't. So if you are going to pay someone to assemble an engine and buy internals, imo it would be kinda nuts to pay them to build you another 351.
 
Reactions: Nikia

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,109
2,726
224
Vass, NC
Oct 27, 2014
#135
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #135
The posts are numbered in each thread. For example, this post is #135 (see the bottom right corner of the post). In #116, I linked a member's combo that I would duplicate if I were you. The only thing I wouldn't do is port GT40s. I'd do as little as required to get an explorer motor running right and let the turbo do the work. The better the H/C/I combo, the less boost you will need. That said an intercooled turbo should be fine at less than 15 psi on premium gas WITH A GOOD TUNE. Pay for a quality tune and use someone local if possible.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Oct 27, 2014
#136
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #136
2000xp8 said:
I'd say most people here aren't qualified to build their own short block. .
Click to expand...
I don't know if this is accurate, but if it is, that's too bad, It's not difficult. If you have the mental capacity to pull an engine out of a car and reinstall it, you have the capacity to rebuild a shortblock. You just have to read, and learn.


2000xp8 said:
I'd also guess that the ones that do know how to build an engine properly aren't here asking questions about building an engine.
Click to expand...
Maybe they'd like to learn, hence the questions?

2000xp8 said:
Regardless, stock 351 engines aren't known for putting up with much more power than stock 302, the block does but the internals don't. So if you are going to pay someone to assemble an engine and buy internals, imo it would be kinda nuts to pay them to build you another 351.
Click to expand...

I strongly disagree with this, respectfully. My point is/was-Why pay someone to assemble an engine when you can learn to do it yourself? Anyone with more will power and intellect than money can buy good used parts, and assemble a decent engine for a crap ton less money than an "engine builder" will do it for. If a person wants to go north of 500 hp on limited finance a 351 has been and always will be a viable way to meet that goal. I'm not the only person in this camp. This is called "hot rodding", and it's been around a while, though it seems to be dying off. Sadly. To me, "nuts" is paying someone else my hard earned money to do something I'm smart enough to learn, and not too lazy to try. I mean, that's why people come here right? to gain knowledge? Just my .02. Sorry to rant...
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,039
1,625
194
NJ
Oct 27, 2014
#137
  • Oct 27, 2014
  • #137
Boosted92LX said:
I don't know if this is accurate, but if it is, that's too bad, It's not difficult. If you have the mental capacity to pull an engine out of a car and reinstall it, you have the capacity to rebuild a shortblock. You just have to read, and learn.



Maybe they'd like to learn, hence the questions?
Click to expand...

Pulling an engine and building one are two completely different things. One is mechanical work, the other detail work that takes time, experience and often a machine shop.
Most racers and repair shops don't build their own engines, so why would it be odd that the average consumer doesn't?
Some things are better off in the hands of someone that does it everyday.

He didn't ask any questions about building an engine, in fact he did just the opposite linked us to shortblocks he was considering.

I believe in doing things yourself, but most people have limits. Knowing those limits is important. Maybe you don't have any and you never pay a person to do a single thing, that's great, but that isn't everyone.

Yes people come here to learn, but the starting point in learning shouldn't be the most intricate thing that you could possibly do to a car.
 
Last edited: Oct 27, 2014
Reactions: A5literMan

Old Skooler

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2012
248
43
39
Mar 16, 2015
#138
  • Mar 16, 2015
  • #138
I read through this post and the moral of the story is, you have to pay to play. 3 years ago I opted to rebuild my 302 sportsman block (not DART sportsman) with the intent that after a few years of enjoyment and upgrades to fuel, suspension tranny etc.. I would start to build a DART based 363 so when I add a SC to my stock block I have something to fall back on when/if it fails. I built a carb 347 w/ worked AFR 205's, 850 DP a big cam and 10.8.1 compression, for a grand total of 415 rwhp and 398 lbs. this wasn't the cheapest options and unfortunately a lot broke around the motor preventing me from using it much over the last 3 years. Now I'm adding a Procharger and a butt load of supporting top of the line parts to put me into the 550 rwhp, w/ meth inj for those interested.

Odds are my block will eventually fail but the 363 is in with the engine builder and will go in when I get every penny out of the stock block.

Having to do all over again I would have built up everything else on the car while enjoying it stock and when the funds were available I would have spent a good deal of money building 1 bullet proof motor.

We are all on a quest to build fast cars now, the smart ones wait, build up the supporting parts, build a killer motor and spend 10k less then me.
 
Reactions: stangboy
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
First Prev 7 of 7
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
994
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
help me understand calibrated maf sensors and injectors
  • stackz
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread Evolution of the 'Hudson Heap' plans (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Jan 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Noobz347
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
302 Engine build questions
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Apr 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2022
LEEDAY Boss
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?