• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Tweecer install question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jack's95gt
  • Start date Start date Dec 15, 2004
J

Jack's95gt

Member
Aug 15, 2004
443
1
18
Huntingdon Valley, PA
Dec 15, 2004
#1
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #1
I just received a Tweecer RT, I won on ebay. I got caught up in the bidding and paid $422. Afterward I figured I should of just bought a new one for $550. I connected to the laptop and it saw it and I loaded the driver, so I guess it works.

Here's my question. I have two EEC's computers GT T4M0 & Cobra J4J1. which one should I use with the Tweecer?
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Dec 15, 2004
#2
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #2
I guess that's up to you. I'm not sure of which is better to start off with.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Dec 15, 2004
#3
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #3
Either one will work, I am running a T4M0 and J4J1 program on my GT's T4M0 computer. As long as the family of processor is the same as the base file your modding you can use any one of that families processors with that processor. You can run a T4M0, J4J1, and I think the Wxxx is also a 5sp. processor (there are two GT 5spd processors listed on the tweecer download site one for a coupe and one for a vert.) on the car. Just pick one and sell the other or keep it for a spare incase you dump it under water or something ???
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 15, 2004
#4
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #4
IMHO, I would use the Cobra pcm for the following reasons.

1. If the Tweecer should die the Cobra pcm default j4j1 cal file matches your
24lb inj's
t-5 trans
C&L maf can work in "cheat mode" with a sample tube change out

2. j4j1 is better suited for a combo with h/c/i & larger inj's

3. Again if the Tweecer should die the j4j1 has a less aggrressive spark curve and a fatter af ratio default setting. Two things which are good for your blown combo.

Welcome to the world of self tuning.

Later
Grady
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 15, 2004
#5
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #5
looks like the j4j1 is closer to your current configuration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
503
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
F
Electrical From scratch: alternator wiring
  • fox racer v2
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
570
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 23, 2025
fox racer v2
F
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Programming 99-04 Mustang Keys using Forscan
  • Mustang5L5
  • Nov 28, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 28, 2023
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?