Tweecer + Solid Roller = ???

TooSlow408 said:

Well since i cant seem to get any information in my other thread i figured id go in another direction...Ive been looking at the tweecer and everybody seems to be doing just fine with them...but most that i see are used on cars with just bolt ons or a mild h/c/i...is there a reason for that or am i just blind? I havent seen anybody with big cubes and a big roller use one..again i may just be blind but is there any reason why i shouldnt use a tweecer??

Click to expand...

TooSlow408 said:

I just dont want it to be like a "band aid" as compared to a full standalone setup. I want it to be tuned to its maximum performance not just "good enough". It has a custom chip now but im not real pleased with the way it runs now and i hate to drive 2 hours away to get the same unsatisfactory tune or to drive 1000 miles to get a good custom tune only to change something in the future and have to go back.

Thanks for the help

Click to expand...

strtrcr50 said:

It all depends on how good you are. It can do as good if not better than a full standalone and the datalogging is great. It is the only system that datalogs the long term and short term fuel trims so you can pretty much get your part throttle drivability dialed in. Combined with a wideband, it should be no trouble to get full throttle dialed in as long as you know what you are looking for there. Also, if you wanted, you could get the chip read out, load that onto the tweecer and use that as a starting point. If you haven't gone there yet, I recommend you go to EECTuning.org • Index page and ask this same question.

Click to expand...