• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

TYPHOON INTAKE....THE TRUTH....(IS DESIRED)

  • Thread starter Thread starter IMPORTSMOKER
  • Start date Start date Jul 4, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

IMPORTSMOKER

Member
Feb 16, 2004
201
0
16
RIVERSIDE, CA
Jul 4, 2004
#1
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #1
i HAVE AN S/C TRIM @ 5PSI, 30LB INJECTORS, 73C/L, EXHAUST AND OTHER MINORS.... MY STOCK INTAKE IS CURRENTLY OFF OF THE CAR SOOOOO....WITH STOCK HEADS + CAM... WILL I FEEL AN INCREASE IN POWER WITH THE TYPHOON UPPER AND LOWER??? I NEED ANSWERS AND I NEED EM FAST....WILL I FEEL ANY SEAT "O" PANTS DIFFERENCE WITH THE TYPHOON INTAKE TOSSED ON MY BASICLY STOCK...SUPERCHARGED MOTOR???..............THANKS.....
 

shttygtstang

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
978
0
0
Jul 4, 2004
#2
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #2
they are edelbrock rip offs. they will make power how much im not shure i belive its like 25hp on a stock motor
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 4, 2004
#3
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #3
You should. I noticed a difference in the seat with stock heads and a mild cam, N/A. Anderson Ford Motorsport recommends it primarily as a supercharger intake, so I'd say it'd be worth your while for the price, especially if you can clean it up a bit and port match it. I would definately trust their judgement. It won't make the difference it would if you had a real cam or bigger heads, but in a forced setup every little bit counts more; especially with a 70mm TB, 75mm MAF and 30# injectors.
 
R

ratrapp

New Member
Apr 24, 2004
510
0
0
buena vista,va
Jul 4, 2004
#4
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #4
same here,i felt a good seat of the pants difference on my motor with a b cam and 70mm tb.my car only has e6 heads so i'm sure when i get done porting mmy e7's i'll feel even more.go for it.
 

IMPORTSMOKER

Member
Feb 16, 2004
201
0
16
RIVERSIDE, CA
Jul 4, 2004
#5
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #5
what would be the optimum size throttle body for my setup?? im thinking 70mm...and will that make an even more noticable difference with the supercharger and typhoon intake??
 
R

ratrapp

New Member
Apr 24, 2004
510
0
0
buena vista,va
Jul 4, 2004
#6
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #6
the opening is close to 70 mm on my intake so i think that would be a good starting point.people complain about 70mm having sluggish throttle response but one of the first mods to my car was add a 70mm edelbrock tb and my car has decent lowend response and pulls hard topend so with a s/c 70 should be fine.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Jul 4, 2004
#7
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #7
Typhoon and 65mm TB will give you everything you need up to 375 HP then you may need more TB..I like the look of the Polished version I bought and quality was actually quite good. I think you'll be happy with your selection. I bought the car with the Eddy Performer RPM and 70mm on it, and it ran good, I pulled the Eddy off cause previous owner had stripped all the upper lower bolts and left me with a unmetered air issue (many moon I searched for my idle problem)..ended up selling the Eddy and TB for more than the Polished upper and lower Typhoon and 65mm TB with spacer cost me. Car runs strong as it did with old set up and 65mm TB gives little bit better throttle response in my opinion.
 

bmo37

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2001
2,368
2
46
New Jersey
Jul 4, 2004
#8
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #8
I have it a typhoon intake both the upper and lower are ported by myself, along with a 70mm accufab, and I'm running about 10lbs of boost, I'd say its a great intake for the price. One a n/a car it will kill your lowend, but on a s/c'd car it owns. Quality is comperable to mac headers paint job, so take it for what its worth. I acutally painted mine with some high heat black paint and it looks really good.
 

mustang88GT

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
186
0
0
Charlotte, North Carolina
Jul 4, 2004
#9
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #9
sweet i think i am goign to buy this once i get the money.. i am bout to buy a blower although i am realitivly stock but i know this is the only time i am going to to have enough money to purhase one
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 4, 2004
#10
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #10
bmo37 said:
One a n/a car it will kill your lowend, but on a s/c'd car it owns.
Click to expand...
I dunno, I agree with about half of that statement- the half I don't have experience in- from what I hear, yes, with forced induction it's the balls. However, I would say my low end is every bit as quick and strong as it ever was before the Typhoon. It wasn't always that way, as you may remember you being one of the few willing to help me diagnose why my car ran like molasses in January when I first put it on (don't think I've forgotten, I'm still greatful)- however, it runs like a raped ape since the problems were fixed. I didn't lose any low end at all that I'm aware of, and N/A. I have a feeling that if I didn't have a good cam in there though, that it wouldn't be the case.
 

timewarped1972

Member
Jun 17, 2004
642
0
16
mesa, az
Jul 4, 2004
#11
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #11
is the typhoon a performer or a performer rpm knock off???????
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 4, 2004
#12
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #12
Performer RPM
 
R

ratrapp

New Member
Apr 24, 2004
510
0
0
buena vista,va
Jul 5, 2004
#13
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #13
i didn't lose any low end torque either and gained a lot higher up and thats with a b-cam that doesn't make any low end(should've got the e-cam,but the b sounds so nice)
 

bmo37

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2001
2,368
2
46
New Jersey
Jul 5, 2004
#14
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #14
stangbear427 said:
I dunno, I agree with about half of that statement- the half I don't have experience in- from what I hear, yes, with forced induction it's the balls. However, I would say my low end is every bit as quick and strong as it ever was before the Typhoon. It wasn't always that way, as you may remember you being one of the few willing to help me diagnose why my car ran like molasses in January when I first put it on (don't think I've forgotten, I'm still greatful)- however, it runs like a raped ape since the problems were fixed. I didn't lose any low end at all that I'm aware of, and N/A. I have a feeling that if I didn't have a good cam in there though, that it wouldn't be the case.
Click to expand...

Maybe I should have been more descriptive, when I actually installed my typhoon intake, it was prior to having heads and cam done on the car so that is probably why I felt like the lowend was a little sluggish, after I swaped the heads and cam out The car ran like a raped ape. I shouldn't have said n/a in general cause thats not the case.
 

Tomato

New Member
Apr 9, 2003
328
0
0
Calgary
Jul 5, 2004
#15
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #15
If you are using a good throttle body like the Accufab or motorsport, the 65 or 70 is lots. If you use the cheapo knock offs, use the 75mm.

Also, if you use the proffessional products tbody, check to see that when at wot, the thottle stop is lined up right as there is too much throttle shafe movement at wot, and you can miss the stop, and get stuck at WOT. I would also run a secondary throtle return spring since these POS have a WIMPY spring compared to anything else on the market.

Also, when you go and buy yours, check a couple different ones for free and smooth opening. Probably at least half of these are sticky right off if idle....
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 5, 2004
#16
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #16
Ditto that! You get what you pay for! I got the PP TB too, and had every one of those issues mentioned. POS! I sent it back for refund and got an Edlebrock, which for another $20 looked like it was worth at least twice as much just in finish quality alone, nevermind how well it works. PP TB's are not worth getting unless you aren't in a hurry to get your car running again (like, ever). Mine was un-usable new out of the box- the butterfly was frozen in the body and couldn't even be broken free.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Jul 5, 2004
#17
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #17
Ok..mine was good..far better than my BBK 70mm which had all the above mentioned problems plus an anoying whistle...PP makes good products from what I have seen but everyone has bad parts, I work for a tooling distributor and I see "crap" parts from every supplier every so often no matter how reputable the company or their quality checks.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 5, 2004
#18
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #18
Yes, but you are the first person I have heard say they got a Professional Products TB that wasn't dead out of the box. It was just what I would expect from China.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Jul 5, 2004
#19
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #19
Most everything made in China is crap in terms of quality and reliability..no slamming intended it's just true...import quality products often leave much to be desired. If I had known the intake and TB were from china originally I would have never purchased it, but it was the hot looking polished version sitting on the speed shop floor with the cheap price tag that got me to buying it. Unfortunately the intake was made in China but it is a great looking peice that went in without any hassle or modification needed, it came with all the parts and performed flawlessly. Sorry but I have to give the PP company a thumbs up.
 

stang22

Active Member
Jan 29, 2003
1,318
7
38
Washington, D.C.
Jul 5, 2004
#20
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #20
DMAN302,

I bought a Typhoon upper/lower polished and am very happy with it so far. The only thing I did was re-polish it and my engine builder cleaned up the ports a little bit, but that was it. It went on the engine no problems whatsoever and it looks really good.

Tim




 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
ANY HELP IS APPRECIATED 1988 mustang gt
  • Foxbody1988
  • Dec 23, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2019
General karthief
A
Advice for upcoming supercharged New Edge build
  • alwayshi
  • Jun 23, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
14K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2019
Dark04GT
A
Fuel & Tuning setup for upcoming 00' S/C GT Questions
  • alwayshi
  • Jun 20, 2019
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 20, 2019
alwayshi
A
Progress Thread Dirty Water Racing 89 Notch Project
  • ShedBuiltMS
  • Sep 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2021
Flyboy60
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?