• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

U/D pullies or cold air?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bgwrm89GT
  • Start date Start date Jun 22, 2004

bgwrm89GT

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
173
0
0
Central Florida
Jun 22, 2004
#1
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #1
Just wanted some opinions on which to get first, I have a 02 GT with borla stinger exhaust, but my car seems to be lacking in the bottom end department. (I'm used to my old 5.0 with 3.73 gears)
 

02mingreyGT

New Member
Jan 4, 2004
280
0
0
Portales, NM
Jun 22, 2004
#2
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #2
U/D pullies are alot better than Cold Air wich does little to nothing for the newer modular stang. Just get some Steeda U/D pullies and Timing Adjuster while your at it. You shouldnt be dissapointed
 

bgwrm89GT

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
173
0
0
Central Florida
Jun 22, 2004
#3
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #3
02mingreyGT said:
U/D pullies are alot better than Cold Air wich does little to nothing for the newer modular stang. Just get some Steeda U/D pullies and Timing Adjuster while your at it. You shouldnt be dissapointed
Click to expand...

I see in your sig. you have a diablo chip, was it worth the $$? Any noticable gains?
 

Nopantz

New Member
May 26, 2003
234
0
0
NJ/US Merchant Marine Academy
Jun 22, 2004
#4
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #4
juss go get some 4.10s gears and that should help wake up the bottom end...the cold air kit wont do much...get a drop in kn filter and remove the airsilencer
 

bgwrm89GT

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
173
0
0
Central Florida
Jun 22, 2004
#5
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #5
I already removed the air silencer and got a K&N, and I'd like to wait on gears because I'm not sure about future mods. Iguess I'll go with pullies for now, it sounds like cold air doesn't give you much bang for your buck. Thanks guys
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Jun 22, 2004
#6
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #6
I have both. Not really sure of the gains on each because the pullies were added to the car as it was being buttoned back up after the cam-swap.

If you get a CAI later, I would suggest the Steeda or the new Mac that is a copy of the Steeda. The nice thing about the Steeda CAI and a couple others is that they don't have the 90* bend that goes into the fenderwell. That way it doesn't screw with the MAF reading and at the track you can pull the passenger side headlight so that air has a straight shot to the filter.
 

02mingreyGT

New Member
Jan 4, 2004
280
0
0
Portales, NM
Jun 22, 2004
#7
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #7
Well I got the diablo chip soon after i got my car wich was kind of a mistake because i hadnt done many mods yet.. But i did notice a small gain from the advanced timing.. Im glad i have it now tho because i will soon be adding nitrous and gears so i will need the chip anyways
 

mpcv2000

Active Member
Jul 29, 2002
2,371
0
47
Montreal , Quebec !
Jun 22, 2004
#8
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #8
02mingreyGT said:
U/D pullies are alot better than Cold Air wich does little to nothing for the newer modular stang. Just get some Steeda U/D pullies
Click to expand...

He's right !
 
S

stanford20

New Member
Dec 16, 2003
55
0
0
elkmont
Jun 22, 2004
#9
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #9
02mingreyGT said:
U/D pullies are alot better than Cold Air wich does little to nothing for the newer modular stang. Just get some Steeda U/D pullies and Timing Adjuster while your at it. You shouldnt be dissapointed
Click to expand...

i have a 2004 gt.i was kinda having the same question he had if i get the u/d pullies will i need the timing adjuster or is that like a complement and give me more power. i also see you have a k&n filter charger will that give me the same amount of power as the fipk. are they basically the same??
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Jun 23, 2004
#10
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #10
There's been a lot of good said about the GEN 2 K&N FIPK - I'd rethink the idea of pulleys over CAI. I've never been a huge fan of CAI, but numbers don't lie. (People do, but hey, whatcha gonna do?)
 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Jun 23, 2004
#11
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #11
Cold air intake should really be called HOT AIR INTAKE .
 
J

Joel's98GT

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
368
0
0
central OH
Jun 23, 2004
#12
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #12
02mingreyGT said:
U/D pullies are alot better than Cold Air wich does little to nothing for the newer modular stang. Just get some Steeda U/D pullies and Timing Adjuster while your at it. You shouldnt be dissapointed
Click to expand...

i'm with him.
 

kboy262

Active Member
Apr 20, 2003
437
0
26
Atlanta-Kennesaw
Jun 23, 2004
#13
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #13
1low03gt said:
Cold air intake should really be called HOT AIR INTAKE .
Click to expand...

So true. I have the MAC with the 90 degree bend. Even though it looks really nice, that thing gets so hot it will burn the hairs off my arm. Also the issue with 90 degree bend messing up the MAF is also true. The bend disturbes the airflow causing the MAF to think you are getting more air then you really are. What I did was the Darkwolf Mod where you turn the MAF 90 degrees to the passenger side. This will help that issue and not cause you to run rich. It has been dyno proven in the past but might not work for everybody.

I say get the U/D pullies and later on down the road go ahead and get the CAI, but get the straight shot design (Steeda, K&N, MAC). I am changing mine for the straight shot sometime in the near future.
 

Slapyo

Admin Dude
Feb 8, 2003
1,068
1
49
Anaheim, CA
Jun 23, 2004
#14
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #14
go with the underdrive pullies and a timing adjuster.
 
M

Makalani_96GT

New Member
Jun 10, 2003
159
0
0
SoCal
Jun 23, 2004
#15
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #15
twogts4us said:
There's been a lot of good said about the GEN 2 K&N FIPK - I'd rethink the idea of pulleys over CAI. I've never been a huge fan of CAI, but numbers don't lie. (People do, but hey, whatcha gonna do?)
Click to expand...
So why don't you have one?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
214
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
213
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
450
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
265
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
692
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?