Uncut stock piston shortblock 330rwhp combo

S

Stopsign32v

Member

May 18, 2008

394

0

16

Gville, SC

Feb 23, 2009

#1

• Feb 23, 2009

• #1

Well a few people wanted me to make a new thread so here it is..

The combination was

- AFR 165 heads with Jay Allen spec valve springs
- Comp Pro Magnum roller rockers (real light weight on the valve side)
- Edelbrock Performer intake with the lower runners ported to match the heads
- Jay Allen custom grind camshaft
- 70mm Edelbrock TB
- 76mm C&L CAI
- 24lb injectors
- BBK shorty headers
- Summit racing 2.5" O/R H pipe
- Flowmaster American Thunder catback dumped
- BBK Aluminum UD pulleys with no smog pump
- 3.73 gears

- NX nozzle nitrous kit with a 100 shot @ 950psi

 

D

dutch5.0

New Member

Feb 6, 2009

20

0

0

Netherlands

Feb 24, 2009

#2

• Feb 24, 2009

• #2

you sir, have set my new benchmark. Seems like a good combination!
Nice numbers with the happy juice btw
I'm going to assume this is with a good tune? any untuned numbers?

 

HankyGT

Member

Jan 15, 2006

81

3

6

Warren, OH

Feb 24, 2009

#3

• Feb 24, 2009

• #3

Curious to what it would have done on a Mustang dyno.

 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.

Founding Member

Nov 29, 1999

5,676

1

76

Altoona, PA

Feb 24, 2009

#4

• Feb 24, 2009

• #4

Those numbers say uncorrected, what were they corrected? I tried to read the temp and such at the bottom but I can't make it out.

 

S

Stopsign32v

Member

May 18, 2008

394

0

16

Gville, SC

Feb 24, 2009

#5

• Feb 24, 2009

• #5

dutch5.0 said:

you sir, have set my new benchmark. Seems like a good combination!
Nice numbers with the happy juice btw
I'm going to assume this is with a good tune? any untuned numbers?

Click to expand...

Yea the tune was alittle aggressive and in summer time I have slight detonation so I had to back off a degree of timing. When we first strapped it down the car made 242rwhp I believe then it jumped to 27x then to 323 then to 328rwhp.

 

S

Stopsign32v

Member

May 18, 2008

394

0

16

Gville, SC

Feb 24, 2009

#6

• Feb 24, 2009

• #6

Killercanary said:

Those numbers say uncorrected, what were they corrected? I tried to read the temp and such at the bottom but I can't make it out.

Click to expand...

Not sure but the temp that day was 84.52* and 20% humidity.

 

Black Stampede

Founding Member

Sep 3, 2002

1,811

2

39

Grand Rapids, MI

Feb 24, 2009

#7

• Feb 24, 2009

• #7

Not to take away from the combo since its really nice, but a Mustang dyno would make those numbers seem a bit less impressive. I am used to mustang dyno numbers that is why I say this.

Also, GTJake put down 325 rwhp with the standard AFR 165 FTI combo a couple years back. Dunno what ever happened to that guy.

 

YEAHLOH95

Founding Member

Nov 19, 2001

1,249

3

39

EVERETT,PA

Feb 24, 2009

#8

• Feb 24, 2009

• #8

not bad numbers, but what did i t run ?

 

S

Stopsign32v

Member

May 18, 2008

394

0

16

Gville, SC

Feb 24, 2009

#9

• Feb 24, 2009

• #9

Black Stampede said:

Not to take away from the combo since its really nice, but a Mustang dyno would make those numbers seem a bit less impressive. I am used to mustang dyno numbers that is why I say this.

Also, GTJake put down 325 rwhp with the standard AFR 165 FTI combo a couple years back. Dunno what ever happened to that guy.

Click to expand...

Actually if both dynos are calibrated right there should be little change at all.

 

S

Stopsign32v

Member

May 18, 2008

394

0

16

Gville, SC

Feb 24, 2009

#10

• Feb 24, 2009

• #10

YEAHLOH95 said:

not bad numbers, but what did i t run ?

Click to expand...

I never ran it in the 1/4th but it ran 8.2@89mph in the 1/8th.

 

Black Stampede

Founding Member

Sep 3, 2002

1,811

2

39

Grand Rapids, MI

Feb 24, 2009

#11

• Feb 24, 2009

• #11

Stopsign32v said:

Actually if both dynos are calibrated right there should be little change at all.

Click to expand...

Hmmmmm, never heard that before.

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Feb 24, 2009

#12

• Feb 24, 2009

• #12

Black Stampede said:

Not to take away from the combo since its really nice, but a Mustang dyno would make those numbers seem a bit less impressive. I am used to mustang dyno numbers that is why I say this.

Also, GTJake put down 325 rwhp with the standard AFR 165 FTI combo a couple years back. Dunno what ever happened to that guy.

Click to expand...

I would add that pull was done with a sae NOT standard dyno cal

Grady

 

S

Stopsign32v

Member

May 18, 2008

394

0

16

Gville, SC

Feb 24, 2009

#13

• Feb 24, 2009

• #13

I'm not really sure why people even care about dyno numbers in the first place.

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Feb 24, 2009

#14

• Feb 24, 2009

• #14

Stopsign32v said:

I'm not really sure why people even care about dyno numbers in the first place.

Click to expand...

Well ... For one thing ... it takes driver skill or lack of it ... out of the pic

Like strip et's & mph values ... trends can be seen with the dyno

Grady

 

S

Stopsign32v

Member

May 18, 2008

394

0

16

Gville, SC

Feb 24, 2009

#15

• Feb 24, 2009

• #15

final5-0 said:

Well ... For one thing ... it takes driver skill or lack of it ... out of the pic

Like strip et's & mph values ... trends can be seen with the dyno

Grady

Click to expand...

Like what values? Just let the dyno operator know what kinda numbers you are expecting and let him adjust the dyno accordingly. The only thing the dyno should be used for is let you know where to shift and AF ratio.