upper intake manifold

rscapri30682

New Member

Sep 20, 2006

13

0

0

Three Rivers, Michigan

Nov 20, 2006

#1

• Nov 20, 2006

• #1

Just wondering if anybody has used the JEG's upper intake before? A person has one forsale down the street from me. He wanted 200 for it. Hasn't used it. His fits the gt-40 lower. Was thinking about using it for a 347 project. Any info useful.

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/category_10001_10002_65548_-1_10435

 

rscapri30682

New Member

Sep 20, 2006

13

0

0

Three Rivers, Michigan

Nov 20, 2006

#2

• Nov 20, 2006

• #2

anyone?

 

rscapri30682

New Member

Sep 20, 2006

13

0

0

Three Rivers, Michigan

Nov 21, 2006

#3

• Nov 21, 2006

• #3

someone must know some about this intake:SNSign:

 

bullitstang1313

Member

Jan 21, 2003

713

0

16

Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana

Nov 21, 2006

#4

• Nov 21, 2006

• #4

I believe box upper intakes don't keep much vacuum, so you might need a vacuum booster in order to help with the vacuum assist brakes. Also, changing the runner length has an affect on the engine's torque range. I'm not sure how switching to the box upper will affect this but I'm sure there will be a change. It really depends on what other parts you will use to compliment your combo.

 

rscapri30682

New Member

Sep 20, 2006

13

0

0

Three Rivers, Michigan

Nov 21, 2006

#5

• Nov 21, 2006

• #5

I'll keep that vaccum in mind. In my 347 build-up, I'm running a f303. But, not by choice. Does anybody know what the vaccum is like with this cam?

 

bullitstang1313

Member

Jan 21, 2003

713

0

16

Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana

Nov 21, 2006

#6

• Nov 21, 2006

• #6

Do you plan on going with forced induction or are you going to keep it naturally aspirated?

 

rscapri30682

New Member

Sep 20, 2006

13

0

0

Three Rivers, Michigan

Nov 21, 2006

#7

• Nov 21, 2006

• #7

naturally aspirated, thats the plan speed shop and I developed

 

S

seijirou

Founding Member

Aug 15, 2002

2,417

4

48

DFW

Nov 21, 2006

#8

• Nov 21, 2006

• #8

The F cam is pretty good about vaccum I believe. It doesn't have a whole heap of overlap if I remember correctly.

I don't know how I feel about the box intake, there is one for a stock lower, and one for a gt40 lower. A box intake on a stock lower is about as useless as it gets. The stock lower sucks and doesn't flow, it doesn't matter how big you go before it, because the stock lower is the bottleneck, not the upper.

On a gt40, you're better off, but I really don't know how well the gt40 lower flows.

Box intakes are really meant for poweradders or really high rpms. If you're building a 8k rpm+ NA motor or a turbo motor I could understand a box upper. Outside of that it's not going to do anything for you that any normal upper intake manifold would.

The fact that it's a box shouldn't have any effect on vaccum.

 

enyawix

Member

Dec 18, 2005

507

0

19

127.0.0.1

Aug 20, 2007

#9

• Aug 20, 2007

• #9

That is a clone of the comp cam intake