• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

USA-630 or some engineering...

  • Thread starter Thread starter skywalker
  • Start date Start date Dec 22, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Dec 22, 2010
#1
  • Dec 22, 2010
  • #1
I am almost done with my '66 (done as in, I can drive it ont he regular if not every day.) So It has a USA-6 that the previous owner put in it. I hate it.

Unfortunately, I really don't want to cut the dash.

The consensus a long time ago was that Custom Auto Sound radios sucked and my experience has born that out. However, I've heard some rumbling that the newer ones aren't as bad. I'm looking at the USA-630 as a possibility. My alternate plans:

a) design my own - I'm an electrical engineer, it'll be time consuming as hell but I'll get a head unit that does only what I need (i.e. no cd or cassette) and doesn't require cutting the dash.

or

b) Take a unit with a detachable faceplate (I have one in mind), solder wires to the unit from the faceplate, mount the unit in one location and find a way to mount the faceplate on the dash.

I got the inspiration for (b) from someone who had done something similar, but they left a radio in the dash and just used the faceplate as a remote. I don't like that method for a couple of reasons.

(a) would be a royal PITA to do.

So does anyone have any experience or opinion on the USA-630? I'm not looking for competition quality, but something other than suck would be nice.
 

horseballz

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2009
824
19
49
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 23, 2010
#2
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #2
I hear much better reports on the Retrosound units than any Custom Auto Sound stuff, new or old. And, unfortunately, the Kenwood stuff that's available has NO aux inputs.

RetroSoundUSA.com - 1968-79 FORD F250 & F100 Truck Retrosound Model One Am/FM Radio w/ Infinimount Bracket System

HTH,
Gene
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Dec 23, 2010
#3
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #3
skywalker said:
or

b) Take a unit with a detachable faceplate (I have one in mind), solder wires to the unit from the faceplate, mount the unit in one location and find a way to mount the faceplate on the dash.

I got the inspiration for (b) from someone who had done something similar, but they left a radio in the dash and just used the faceplate as a remote. I don't like that method for a couple of reasons.

(a) would be a royal PITA to do.
Click to expand...
Its not that hard. We do it on custom installs. All you to is get a ribbon cable and some minor soldering, maybe 6-12 wires.
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Dec 23, 2010
#4
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #4
I think when I get one it will be the Retrosound one. I keep hearing much better things about them.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Dec 23, 2010
#5
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #5
iskwezm: the soldering doesnt phase me. How do you suggest I mount the faceplate though?I was thing a [iece of ABS and some short shaft screws...

My problem with Retrosound is that I would have to plug my iPod into an aux jack and control it directly - total no go for me. I want to be able to shove my iPod in the glove compartment and leave it.
 
M

mysavioreigns

New Member
Mar 2, 2007
23
0
0
Arlington, TX
Dec 23, 2010
#6
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #6
iskwezm said:
Its not that hard. We do it on custom installs. All you to is get a ribbon cable and some minor soldering, maybe 6-12 wires.
Click to expand...

That's a pretty neat idea...anyone have a picture of this?
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Dec 23, 2010
#7
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #7
mysavioreigns said:
That's a pretty neat idea...anyone have a picture of this?
Click to expand...

It's been done before...I saw pictures from a site linked on here.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Dec 23, 2010
#8
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #8
skywalker said:
iskwezm: the soldering doesnt phase me. How do you suggest I mount the faceplate though?I was thing a [iece of ABS and some short shaft screws...

My problem with Retrosound is that I would have to plug my iPod into an aux jack and control it directly - total no go for me. I want to be able to shove my iPod in the glove compartment and leave it.
Click to expand...
on one car YEARS ago, i made the dash speaker grill hinged and mounted it under that with a fiberglass housing

ive also put them in the rear view mirror or visor
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Dec 23, 2010
#9
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #9
iskwezm said:
on one car YEARS ago, i made the dash speaker grill hinged and mounted it under that with a fiberglass housing

ive also put them in the rear view mirror or visor
Click to expand...

I'm thinking I find a way to put it right on the dash. I want no one to be the wiser that i didn't cut the dash.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Dec 23, 2010
#10
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #10
skywalker said:
I am almost done with my '66 (done as in, I can drive it ont he regular if not every day.) So It has a USA-6 that the previous owner put in it. I hate it.

Unfortunately, I really don't want to cut the dash.

The consensus a long time ago was that Custom Auto Sound radios sucked and my experience has born that out. However, I've heard some rumbling that the newer ones aren't as bad. I'm looking at the USA-630 as a possibility. My alternate plans:

a) design my own - I'm an electrical engineer, it'll be time consuming as hell but I'll get a head unit that does only what I need (i.e. no cd or cassette) and doesn't require cutting the dash.





Take a unit with a detachable faceplate (I have one in mind), solder wires to the unit from the faceplate, mount the unit in one location and find a way to mount the faceplate on the dash.

I got the inspiration for (b) from someone who had done something similar, but they left a radio in the dash and just used the faceplate as a remote. I don't like that method for a couple of reasons.

(a) would be a royal PITA to do.

So does anyone have any experience or opinion on the USA-630? I'm not looking for competition quality, but something other than suck would be nice.
Click to expand...

Or, you could have your OEM upgrade with modern electronics to give you Fader, Balance, 140 WATTS / channel and MP3 capabilities.
I've done this. It works, it fits, it looks OEM, but functions like a modern radio.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Dec 23, 2010
#11
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • #11
PoppyMod said:
Or, you could have your OEM upgrade with modern electronics to give you Fader, Balance, 140 WATTS / channel and MP3 capabilities.
I've done this. It works, it fits, it looks OEM, but functions like a modern radio.
Click to expand...

Define OEM upgrade?
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Dec 24, 2010
#12
  • Dec 24, 2010
  • #12
skywalker said:
Define OEM upgrade?
Click to expand...

About two years ago, being not happy with all of the tune box selections, I decided to search for a OEM radio upgrade conversion alternative. I wanted to keep the "look and feel" of my stock '65 radio. but, have the modern attributes. I found a guy in PA, who will gut the factory radio and install modern capabilities, all the while the radio looks stock. The only way you can tell it's different is when turned on, there is a tiny led in the station selection strip that lights to indicate station strength. As mentioned,it has 4 channels, FADER, BALANCE, a MP3 port, 140 Watts/ channel and an auto-on antenna power feature. This last feature can be used for other accessories, but, I use it for my auto-antenna.
Not wanting to "gut" my OEM radio, I bought a donor for $25. shipped it to him.
It's very clever how you change the balance from left to right and fade the sound from front to rear with using the existing tuning knobs. It's not cheap, but then, our hobby, if one wants moder tunes with a little perfection, doesn't care. PM me for costs and the name. I Googled for this conversion.
Happy Motoring!
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Dec 24, 2010
#13
  • Dec 24, 2010
  • #13
PoppyMod said:
About two years ago, being not happy with all of the tune box selections, I decided to search for a OEM radio upgrade conversion alternative. I wanted to keep the "look and feel" of my stock '65 radio. but, have the modern attributes. I found a guy in PA, who will gut the factory radio and install modern capabilities, all the while the radio looks stock. The only way you can tell it's different is when turned on, there is a tiny led in the station selection strip that lights to indicate station strength. As mentioned,it has 4 channels, FADER, BALANCE, a MP3 port, 140 Watts/ channel and an auto-on antenna power feature. This last feature can be used for other accessories, but, I use it for my auto-antenna.
Not wanting to "gut" my OEM radio, I bought a donor for $25. shipped it to him.
It's very clever how you change the balance from left to right and fade the sound from front to rear with using the existing tuning knobs. It's not cheap, but then, our hobby, if one wants moder tunes with a little perfection, doesn't care. PM me for costs and the name. I Googled for this conversion.
Happy Motoring!
Click to expand...

By MP3 port, I'm guessing you mean an aux input - something I am specifically avoiding by ruling out the Retrosound radios. I want to be able to control my ipod fromt he dash.

I'd seen a couple places that does this before, but it's not really for me since it doesn't have my features.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Dec 25, 2010
#14
  • Dec 25, 2010
  • #14
there is no way in hell ANY head unit will put out 140 watts per channel
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Dec 25, 2010
#15
  • Dec 25, 2010
  • #15
iskwezm said:
there is no way in hell ANY head unit will put out 140 watts per channel
Click to expand...

Sure it will...for about 5ms before the amp circuitry blows.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Dec 26, 2010
#16
  • Dec 26, 2010
  • #16
iskwezm said:
there is no way in hell ANY head unit will put out 140 watts per channel
Click to expand...

Thanks for pointing out my mistake. It should have read 40.
Happy New Year!
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Dec 26, 2010
#17
  • Dec 26, 2010
  • #17
even at 40 watts, its still maybe gonna put out about 15-20 max.Theres no wat they could fit the coils and capacitors in the radio chassis to actually make that power.
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Jan 25, 2011
#18
  • Jan 25, 2011
  • #18
I agree with what Iskwezm just said. I have no idea why the aftermarket radios claim the put out 50 watts per channel. I have a Kenwood that I really like that claims 40 per channel. I have a 100 watt 50 by 2 Optimus amp for my rear 6x9s and its twice as much power as with out the amp. I know some of you may make fun of the Radio Shack amp, but I have tried a couple other more powerful amps like a 200 watt Pioneer and they didn't sound as good as the Optimus.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jan 25, 2011
#19
  • Jan 25, 2011
  • #19
tx65coupe said:
I agree with what Iskwezm just said. I have no idea why the aftermarket radios claim the put out 50 watts per channel. I have a Kenwood that I really like that claims 40 per channel. I have a 100 watt 50 by 2 Optimus amp for my rear 6x9s and its twice as much power as with out the amp. I know some of you may make fun of the Radio Shack amp, but I have tried a couple other more powerful amps like a 200 watt Pioneer and they didn't sound as good as the Optimus.
Click to expand...
They claim 50 watts per channel, becasue buying those are not into car audio and have no clue.So they see that and think they now have a 200 watt stereo. It MIGHT put out 50 watts per channel at more then 1% THD which is full blast and sounding like worse crap then a normal volume.Its marketing and hoping people call for it.
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Jan 26, 2011
#20
  • Jan 26, 2011
  • #20
It probably is just marketing hype.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
136
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
Electrical Innovate PSB-1 is DOA? Am I an idiot? All plausable. Please Help
  • Dontknowchit
  • Apr 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
405
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 26, 2025
Dontknowchit
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
534
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
D
Foxbody Misfire 5.0 Swap
  • DPORTER0729
  • May 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
568
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 13, 2025
90sickfox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?