Want a Sig? Post a Pic

I'm watching this thread. Let it be known I don't want to PM anyone about their sig size now that bigcat has reminded everyone about the size limits.

It's really easy: If you get your sig made in this thread (or if you make it yourself), and it's the wrong size, beware. Should you choose to use it (it's YOUR responsibility to make sure it fits the rules), and it's in violation, we'll TURN it off for quite a long time (look at SRT's sig, for example).

And to SRT: it's great that you're volunteering to do this, but make sure you abide by the rules with the finished product.
 
AGAIN, HOW DO I TELL HOW BIG IT IS???? it appears small in my signature.:shrug:
Here you go, resized to off-site hosting pixel requirements...

.
.

sigbd9.webp


.
.

Just put this in your signature without the spaces between the image tags.

[ IMG ]http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/6017/sigbd9.jpg[ /IMG ]
 

Attachments

  • sigbd9.webp
    sigbd9.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 96
MustangWeek2007014.webp

lunar002.webp

mustang2.webp

newcar010.webp

Picture.webp



you should be able to find something to work with there
 

Attachments

  • MustangWeek2007014.webp
    MustangWeek2007014.webp
    117.9 KB · Views: 98
  • lunar002.webp
    lunar002.webp
    9.8 KB · Views: 105
  • mustang2.webp
    mustang2.webp
    57.6 KB · Views: 100
  • newcar010.webp
    newcar010.webp
    24.6 KB · Views: 114
  • Picture.webp
    Picture.webp
    27.7 KB · Views: 111
Question to moderators,

why are the requirements for Sig Images so Small?

....i have been noticing that alot of other forums allow bigger images. Bimmerforums.com for example is very strict with there image size guidelines in sigs max size is 600 pixels wide and 240 pixels high
 
Question to moderators,

why are the requirements for Sig Images so Small?

....i have been noticing that alot of other forums allow bigger images. Bimmerforums.com for example is very strict with there image size guidelines in sigs max size is 600 pixels wide and 240 pixels high

bandwidth, they're spending money to host information and conversations, not images. Plus the wider you allow sig the longer pages become, and the less you can read of people's responses w/out scrolling more
 
needed a break from work, this may or may not look good since im tired..i think the proper pixels are 600x150 if i recall...this is what the image is sized to, if thats wrong dont use it.

hhfdb.webp
 

Attachments

  • hhfdb.webp
    hhfdb.webp
    10.1 KB · Views: 116
i think the proper pixels are 600x150 if i recall...
just remember guys, there are size limits to the pics can have in your sig. please refer to the terms of service for more information, but here are the basics:

* For images in signatures: 1 image up to 500 pixels wide, 100 pixels tall and 20k in size for SN hosted images.

* 650 pixels wide, 125 pixels high for off-site hosted images

i see quite a few here that don't meet these requirements please adjust as necessary. thanks.
 
god damn..thanks for the repost..hold on guys..ur gunna have to wait till i can resize them

romancer..let me know if you have a problem with yours..although the height is like 25px over, the actual size 360x149 isnt 600x125. 600x125 is bigger than 360x149 so i think ur alright

heres the updated 1 2001:
hhfdb.webp

if it looks the same, ur gunna have to clear out your temp internet files..its changed on my photobucket account
 

Attachments

  • hhfdb.webp
    hhfdb.webp
    10.1 KB · Views: 112