Well the numbers are in

T

tjh566

New Member

May 22, 2004

608

0

0

Northern Va

Dec 8, 2006

#1

• Dec 8, 2006

• #1

226 rwhp and 265 rwtq a tune would help this but Ill get it tuned after I finish my next project

Not too bad I guess, Curves look real good.... Now for the supercharger...

 

9

96darkhorse

Founding Member

Oct 2, 2001

693

0

16

wilmington, california

Dec 9, 2006

#2

• Dec 9, 2006

• #2

i think your wayyyy low dude!!!! i made 225/292 with just Longtubes, offroad h,and borla catback....thats it!!! 5 speed

 

T

tjh566

New Member

May 22, 2004

608

0

0

Northern Va

Dec 9, 2006

#3

• Dec 9, 2006

• #3

really? stock they make 170-180 to the wheels.... Anyone else think this is low?

before i took it on the dyno i was expecting about 250/300, i thought it was a little low also... any other opinions?

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Dec 9, 2006

#4

• Dec 9, 2006

• #4

tjh566 said:

really? stock they make 170-180 to the wheels.... Anyone else think this is low?

before i took it on the dyno i was expecting about 250/300, i thought it was a little low also... any other opinions?

Click to expand...

My info is gonna be focused around you still got the stock E7's and max power which pertains to dyno results

The tb, maf & inj's are not all that necessry IMHO as the amount of airflow at this time does not warrant the need for them.

Not saying they won't give a gain, it will be a small one however

I don't see how the larger tb would keep the values down any.
however
The maf/inj's could be another story.

Running them in Cheat Method ...............
Who knows what your final af ratio turned out to be?

That my friend, could very well have kept the numbers low

Throw up the pull and we all can tell more

Grady

 

T

tjh566

New Member

May 22, 2004

608

0

0

Northern Va

Dec 9, 2006

#5

• Dec 9, 2006

• #5

well i dont have a scanner but here some of the numbers

PEAK: 226.24 HP 264.00 tq

RPM - 2 - 2.5 - 3 - 3.5 - 4 - 4.5 - 5 - 5.5
HP - 90 112 140 170 200 218 225 210
TQ - 230 240 248 258 264 252 235 200

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Dec 9, 2006

#6

• Dec 9, 2006

• #6

tjh566 said:

well i dont have a scanner but here some of the numbers

PEAK: 226.24 HP 264.00 tq

RPM - 2 - 2.5 - 3 - 3.5 - 4 - 4.5 - 5 - 5.5
HP - 90 112 140 170 200 218 225 210
TQ - 230 240 248 258 264 252 235 200

Click to expand...

Was kinda looking to see if you were too lean or fat!

Grady

 

T

tjh566

New Member

May 22, 2004

608

0

0

Northern Va

Dec 9, 2006

#7

• Dec 9, 2006

• #7

Oh, didnt have the A/F hooked-up. putting a wideband on with the supercharger so we'll see whats shes doing then.

 

Therian

The Highlander

Founding Member

Apr 21, 2002

0

1

0

Waterloo, Ontario

Dec 9, 2006

#8

• Dec 9, 2006

• #8

I'd have to say it's a touch low also

 

B

bimmertech

New Member

May 3, 2005

1,123

0

0

merriam, ks

Dec 9, 2006

#9

• Dec 9, 2006

• #9

what kind of dyno?

that torque is very low--could be a mustang dyno though.

 

T

tjh566

New Member

May 22, 2004

608

0

0

Northern Va

Dec 9, 2006

#10

• Dec 9, 2006

• #10

not sure what kind of dyno it was, its an AWD dyno if that means anything, in floor

 

Redsnake2

New Member

Aug 8, 2005

374

0

0

Philly, PA

Dec 10, 2006

#11

• Dec 10, 2006

• #11

i was thinking you should be alot closer to 300 than that or maybe 260

 

T

tjh566

New Member

May 22, 2004

608

0

0

Northern Va

Dec 10, 2006

#12

• Dec 10, 2006

• #12

yeah, i was thinkin, 280-300tq and around 250hp, but maybe its out of tune or something, who knows

 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.

Founding Member

Nov 29, 1999

5,676

1

76

Altoona, PA

Dec 10, 2006

#13

• Dec 10, 2006

• #13

I too would have expected the HP numbers to fall in the 235-245 range on a dynojet.

 

T

tjh566

New Member

May 22, 2004

608

0

0

Northern Va

Dec 10, 2006

#14

• Dec 10, 2006

• #14

i was talkin to the guy there and he said a tune could prolly pick up close to 20hp for me, but ill get it tuned up once the charger is on.

 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member

Mar 7, 2002

1,976

0

36

Cape Cod, MA

Dec 10, 2006

#15

• Dec 10, 2006

• #15

like grady said, dont forget he still has the stock heads. even if you put all kinds of goodies on its still gonna bottleneck at the ports.

that should be an accurate number imho

also, i agree....if he dident log a/f then he could be missing some power, but not a ton

 

ProKiller

Founding Member

Apr 26, 2002

3,064

15

78

PA

Dec 11, 2006

#16

• Dec 11, 2006

• #16

get some different heads and then get it dynod. you have a good start, but like said, your bottlenecking like crazy at the ports. the numbers seem average to me with what you have now.

 

G

greenstang1313

New Member

Jun 15, 2005

158

0

0

Chelmsford, MA

Dec 12, 2006

#17

• Dec 12, 2006

• #17

for a 5.0 with cam and intake, boltons and exhaust those #s are definatly low.

 

T

tjh566

New Member

May 22, 2004

608

0

0

Northern Va

Dec 12, 2006

#18

• Dec 12, 2006

• #18

prolly just needs a tune.