• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Went for a ride in a '11 today

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobra Jay
  • Start date Start date Mar 1, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 5, 2010
#21
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #21
GT_FlyBy said:
Road & Track did a Mustang feature about a year ago. They tested the 2010s, including a specially modded 2010 with 400 HP. The 'quickness' benefit of the extra 85HP, at least 0-60, was quite minimal, a few tenths of a second. I could be wrong but although it's great to know you have 412 HP I don't think it's going to make a dramatic seat-of-the pants difference.
Click to expand...

Lets put it this way....the '03-'04 Cobra's weighed about the same as the '05-up GT's, were putting out about the same horsepower as the newest 5.0L DOHC and stuffing it through a non drag strip friendly IRS. Those cars ran anywhere from 12.5's-12.8's with a good driver.

That's quicker than what both GM and Dodge currently offer in their own pony cars. Based on those comparisons, the '11 sounds it has the potential to be a winner to me.
 
S

STANGmole

Member
Sep 15, 2008
245
1
17
Portland, OR
Mar 5, 2010
#22
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #22
mjk said:
a few (.6+) tenths 0-60 usually translates to over a second in the 1/4...
Click to expand...

True...but I don't buy my Mustangs to drag race so that second difference is negligible. I think the Mustang is more limited by wheel hop and traction issues than a need for more horsepower. ...Not saying 100HP more wouldn't be welcome though
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 5, 2010
#23
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #23
STANGmole said:
True...but I don't buy my Mustangs to drag race so that second difference is negligible. I think the Mustang is more limited by wheel hop and traction issues than a need for more horsepower. ...Not saying 100HP more wouldn't be welcome though
Click to expand...

I guess it’s a good thing that they addressed both those issues with the 2011 model year then, right? Aside from the 100hp bump, the '11 GT's got a revised rear suspension with improved geometry, beefier-boxed control arms, thicker front and rear sway bars, harder durometer bushings and stiffer springs.
 

lcbrownz

New Member
Jun 21, 2008
5
0
0
Mar 7, 2010
#24
  • Mar 7, 2010
  • #24
License Plates

GT JAY said:
living on the East Coast has nothing to do with it. The 2011s arent out yet. I work for Ford and that is a 2011 pilot car. If you look close you'll notice the GT side emblem and not 5.0. Thats because this is a 2010 w/2011 5.0 and 6spd manual
Click to expand...

Your license plates in the photo look like Michigan tags to me.
 

lcbrownz

New Member
Jun 21, 2008
5
0
0
Mar 7, 2010
#25
  • Mar 7, 2010
  • #25
Gearbanger 101 said:
I guess it’s a good thing that they addressed both those issues with the 2011 model year then, right? Aside from the 100hp bump, the '11 GT's got a revised rear suspension with improved geometry, beefier-boxed control arms, thicker front and rear sway bars, harder durometer bushings and stiffer springs.
Click to expand...

You forget the Mustang is getting a limited slip differential for 2011 for all models.
2.73 for the v6 (standard for manual and automatic transmissions)
3.31 for the v6 coupe (option for manual transmissions)
3.31 for the v8 (standard for manual and automatic transmission)
3.55 and 3.73 (option for the v8 manual transmission)
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 7, 2010
#26
  • Mar 7, 2010
  • #26
lcbrownz said:
You forget the Mustang is getting a limited slip differential for 2011 for all models.
2.73 for the v6 (standard for manual and automatic transmissions)
3.31 for the v6 coupe (option for manual transmissions)
3.31 for the v8 (standard for manual and automatic transmission)
3.55 and 3.73 (option for the v8 manual transmission)
Click to expand...

I didn't forget, as much as I just left it out of my list of parts since a limited slip could be had with the previous model GT's as well. But yeah, good point.
 
T

The Fang

Member
Sep 11, 2005
602
0
16
Tallahassee Fl
Mar 7, 2010
#27
  • Mar 7, 2010
  • #27
I really dont get Fords logic when it comes to rear ends. I understand the fact that they can charge more for the upgrade and all, but the Rangers with a 2.3 get 4.10s and they drop the base rear in mustangs from 3.31 down to 2.73.
 

'08GTcaRED

New Member
Apr 8, 2009
330
0
0
Victorville, CA
Mar 7, 2010
#28
  • Mar 7, 2010
  • #28
Yes and like the news article says it the first 6er with 300 horses to have 30 mpg...gearing would have a factor in that I'm assuming
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
351
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
TPony
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
576
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
648
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
New Member from outside Pittsburgh, PA
  • OldTymeToys
  • Jul 16, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
11
Views
469
The Welcome Wagon Jul 23, 2025
Noobz347
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
397
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?