• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Went for a ride in a '11 today

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobra Jay
  • Start date Start date Mar 1, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
Next
First Prev 10 of 11 Next Last

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Mar 14, 2010
#181
  • Mar 14, 2010
  • #181
92GreenGT said:
LoL at the pushrod being better than the modular comments.


Get out of the 90's, technology is a wonderful thing.
Click to expand...

funny how brandX is still using pushrods
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
Mar 14, 2010
#182
  • Mar 14, 2010
  • #182
Funny how BrandX pushrod has nothing to do with the Ford pushrod engine but you can't get off that.

In what area is the Ford 302 Pushrod engine better than the Ford 302 Modular engine?

And btw, the tech between the GM pushrod engines and the Ford pushrod engines are light years apart too.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 15, 2010
#183
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #183
Shaolin Crane said:
funny how brandX is still using pushrods
Click to expand...

Brand X has also ALWAYS relied on displacement to make any sort of power as well. I find it strange how many are are falling all over themselves to worship an engine that makes 426hp with 6.2L's, but now when Ford has put one out that makes similar power levels with a full 1.2L less displacement, its "no big thing" because it hasn't got pushrods.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 15, 2010
#184
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #184
My god are you guys really still
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 15, 2010
#185
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #185
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
My god are you guys really still
Click to expand...

What gives you any indication that it will ever end?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 15, 2010
#186
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #186
Gearbanger 101 said:
What gives you any indication that it will ever end?
Click to expand...

Touche.


Let me break it down:

Coyote 5.0 > Windsor 5.0. This is fact. I'm sorry, that's just how it is. It is superior to the Windsor in every single mechanical aspect possible. Trying to defy this fact is futile.

GM small blocks vs. Ford small blocks are apples to oranges. You may as well drag in every other manufacturer's V8 out there. How about BMW? The current M3 has a 4.0 V8 that makes 420hp and 295tq and redlines at 8300rpm. It's credited as being the lightest V8 in the world. Is that a fair comparison to the Windsor 302? Probably about as fair of a comparison as either the Coyote or GM small blocks.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 15, 2010
#187
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #187
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Let me break it down:

Coyote 5.0 > Windsor 5.0. This is fact. I'm sorry, that's just how it is. It is superior to the Windsor in every single mechanical aspect possible. Trying to defy this fact is futile.

GM small blocks vs. Ford small blocks are apples to oranges. You may as well drag in every other manufacturer's V8 out there. How about BMW? The current M3 has a 4.0 V8 that makes 420hp and 295tq and redlines at 8300rpm. It's credited as being the lightest V8 in the world. Is that a fair comparison to the Windsor 302? Probably about as fair of a comparison as either the Coyote or GM small blocks.
Click to expand...

Couldn't agree more...on all points.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Mar 15, 2010
#188
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #188
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Coyote 5.0 > Windsor 5.0. This is fact. I'm sorry, that's just how it is. It is superior to the Windsor in every single mechanical aspect possible. Trying to defy this fact is futile.
Click to expand...

I factory form, yes, I agree 110%. If you want to consider aftermarket, then it's no so black-and-white. As incredibly super-duper bad ass as the Coyote is, you can't buy an aftermarket Coyote block and bore and stroke the thing to 363ci. I'm not sure you ever will be able to. It will be hard for any engine to EVER approach the aftermarket following the 302 has, but, hey 50 years of production will do that for ya. Times are changing, and engines don't stay around as long as they used to.

But like you said, that's not exactly apples to apples. I'm just trying to justify the pushrod argument. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you.
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
Mar 15, 2010
#189
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #189
Yeah but who wants to have to buy an aftermarket block and all that noise when you don't have to?

That's the beauty of these newer engines, they are stronger from the factory since they are higher hp from the factory. When you build a dart 363 it's hardly a "ford" engine anymore. The only thing Ford in those engines are the design of the engine they are built around.

"Yeah, this ford pushrod is badass...it has no ford parts in it, but it sure is sweet "
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Mar 15, 2010
#190
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #190
if the mod motors were so much better than pusrod stuff then i think you would see a whole lot more 2V and 4V swaps then people just building an aftermarket block windsor motor or god forbid an LS swap.

To me the only advantage that i would ever build a modular over a pushrod is that the factory blocks can handle some serious HP, but there are a whole ton of moving parts and the heads have 2x the ammount of stuff a windsor motor does, so when you go to rebuild that motor, its gonna cost you a ton more.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 15, 2010
#191
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #191
90lxcoupe said:
if the mod motors were so much better than pusrod stuff then i think you would see a whole lot more 2V and 4V swaps then people just building an aftermarket block windsor motor or god forbid an LS swap.

To me the only advantage that i would ever build a modular over a pushrod is that the factory blocks can handle some serious HP, but there are a whole ton of moving parts and the heads have 2x the ammount of stuff a windsor motor does, so when you go to rebuild that motor, its gonna cost you a ton more.
Click to expand...

Points to consider....there are eleventy billion 302/351W scattered across North America in about 15-different Ford Models over the last 30-years. Engines can be had for next to nothing and they've got a huge aftermarket, so therefore swaps are popular.

99% of the guys that are building their engines from scratch are going for broke and big displacement. I can't think of one person going for big power gains who has stuck with the stock 302ci of displacement, heads, or intake, unless a particular class they're running in requires it. Stroker kits are dirt cheap for OHV Windsor’s, so if building big cubes on a small budget is what you're looking for, the OHV Windsor is the logical choice.

On the other hand, you don't see guys running power adders bolting them onto stock 5.0L HO's and calling it a day like they do with the Mod motors. It’s not even worth turning a wrench on a Windsor unless you're replacing the entire top end of the engine to support the airflow. On the other hand, making 400-500rwhp on a modular engine requires little more than a fuel system upgrade.

So yes...both engines have their high points. But neither of these examples has a thing to do with one engine being better than the other.

The "extra moving parts" argument against the Modular’s ludicrous and shows just how inexperienced (dare I say ignorant) some people are with regards to these engines. Extra moving parts in this case means the ability to run tighter tolerances and more accurate timing components, but otherwise has nothing at all to do with hindering functionality or reliability. The fact that they make more horsepower, with less displacement and run for 300-400K needing little more than regular oil changes proves as much.
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
Mar 15, 2010
#192
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #192
It's only sensible to do the modular swap when you plan on making big power(700+hp) in terms of cost at this time.

If you're just wanting a 300-400rwhp car, putting a modular in the car to do it wouldn't be very wise dollar per dollar.

If I was just now getting into modding a Fox, I'd go modular right off the bat because of the power goals I have MY car. 750rwhpish area would be cheaper to get with a modular than it would with a pushrod engine, reliably of course.

My buddies car is a great example of what it takes to build a reliable pushrod engine to take the abuse, the only actual stock Ford parts left on that engine is the power steering pump. Every other single component that came on that engine factory has been replaced.

While you can buy a MMR bottom end, 03 Cobra heads and a 01 Cobra intake, do the turbo kit and make the same power with a stand alone.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Mar 15, 2010
#193
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #193
Gearbanger 101 said:
The "extra moving parts" argument against the Modular’s ludicrous and shows just how inexperienced (dare I say ignorant) some people are with regards to these engines. Extra moving parts in this case means the ability to run tighter tolerances and more accurate timing components, but otherwise has nothing at all to do with hindering functionality or reliability. The fact that they make more horsepower, with less displacement and run for 300-400K needing little more than regular oil changes proves as much.
Click to expand...

I think you read my post how you wanted to hear it.

I never said anything about function or reliability, i said cost, if you brought a 4v head to be rebuilt or serviced its gonna cost more money, there are two times the moving parts, and 4x the ammount of cams. Stuff breaks, valves bend, valve seals leak, thats what i was getting at. Its not ignorance, yea i have no real hands on expierience with the motors but more parts=more money

And as far as running tighter tolerances and and more accurate timing... arent the OHC motors notorious for having different timing on different cams from the factory? from what ive heard degreeing cams on a mod motor is about as fun as a root canal

Ford Racing M-6550-T46 Ford Racing 4.6L DOHC 4V Camshaft Kit
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Mar 15, 2010
#194
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #194
I probally will get a new mustang in a few years considering that now they are actually going to be on par. Once the economy picks back up.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 15, 2010
#195
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #195
Once you buy an aftermarket 302 block and build it, it's not even a Ford engine anymore as far as i'm concerned since you can LITERALLY build an entire "302" with zero Ford parts. You're getting into a whole different realm there and comparing the two is again apples to oranges. You may as well say "well a Man-O-War tall deck 302 stroked to 370ci running 9k RPM is waaaay superior to the Coyote". That's dumb.

Don't get me wrong...i'm a 302 guy at heart, but don't let your feelings and nostalgia cloud the facts. Compare WHAT IS and not what could be after you spend thousands modifying something. Give it 10 years and lets see how far the Coyote has come.
 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Mar 15, 2010
#196
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #196
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Once you buy an aftermarket 302 block and build it, it's not even a Ford engine anymore as far as i'm concerned since you can LITERALLY build an entire "302" with zero Ford parts. You're getting into a whole different realm there and comparing the two is again apples to oranges. You may as well say "well a Man-O-War tall deck 302 stroked to 370ci running 9k RPM is waaaay superior to the Coyote". That's dumb.

Don't get me wrong...i'm a 302 guy at heart, but don't let your feelings and nostalgia cloud the facts. Compare WHAT IS and not what could be after you spend thousands modifying something. Give it 10 years and lets see how far the Coyote has come.
Click to expand...
Very well put.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 15, 2010
#197
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #197
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Once you buy an aftermarket 302 block and build it, it's not even a Ford engine anymore as far as i'm concerned since you can LITERALLY build an entire "302" with zero Ford parts. You're getting into a whole different realm there and comparing the two is again apples to oranges. You may as well say "well a Man-O-War tall deck 302 stroked to 370ci running 9k RPM is waaaay superior to the Coyote". That's dumb.

Don't get me wrong...i'm a 302 guy at heart, but don't let your feelings and nostalgia cloud the facts. Compare WHAT IS and not what could be after you spend thousands modifying something. Give it 10 years and lets see how far the Coyote has come.
Click to expand...

That's the second time in the same page you and I were 100% in agreement!
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Mar 15, 2010
#198
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #198
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Once you buy an aftermarket 302 block and build it, it's not even a Ford engine anymore as far as i'm concerned since you can LITERALLY build an entire "302" with zero Ford parts. You're getting into a whole different realm there and comparing the two is again apples to oranges. You may as well say "well a Man-O-War tall deck 302 stroked to 370ci running 9k RPM is waaaay superior to the Coyote". That's dumb.

Don't get me wrong...i'm a 302 guy at heart, but don't let your feelings and nostalgia cloud the facts. Compare WHAT IS and not what could be after you spend thousands modifying something. Give it 10 years and lets see how far the Coyote has come.
Click to expand...
and yet cost for the cost they would still come out to the same price, being that the crate engine will probably be 10-12k and make 400hp, or an aftermarket "non ford" ford engine will make a ****load more power than the coyote, so i'll stick to my original argument, all i give a **** about is power, and how i make that power and the pushrod is still cheaper and more superior to that aspect
 

adidas

Member
Apr 3, 2004
123
0
16
Liberty, Mo
Mar 15, 2010
#199
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #199
If nothing else, I have learned a WHOLE hell of a lot in this thread...

I'm excited to order my 2011!
 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
Mar 15, 2010
#200
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #200
OMG pushrod is ftw, mod is teh sux

close thread
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
Next
First Prev 10 of 11 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
572
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
351
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
TPony
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
645
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
New Member from outside Pittsburgh, PA
  • OldTymeToys
  • Jul 16, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
11
Views
469
The Welcome Wagon Jul 23, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?