Went to the Dyno today!!!

B

BillaMustang

Founding Member

Jan 20, 2002

491

0

0

Apr 16, 2004

#1

• Apr 16, 2004

• #1

Well the stang put out 310RWHP and 311 foot pounds of torque.

I'm gonna try to attach the image but I dont know how. I have the dyno graph in my e-mail but tryin to get it on here is beyond me..


Well never mind I dont know how to attach an image. But yeah the A/F ratio was at 13.8

 

T_5.0_N'works

New Member

Sep 30, 2003

260

0

0

Texas

Apr 16, 2004

#2

• Apr 16, 2004

• #2

Mods would be great...

 

B

BillaMustang

Founding Member

Jan 20, 2002

491

0

0

Apr 16, 2004

#3

• Apr 16, 2004

• #3

Oh yeah forgot about those!!!

Stock short block 302, E-303, Mild ported GT40Y heads, 1.6RR, RPM Air-Gap, 750 Speed Demon, 15/8to13/4 Bassani lt's, Bassani X-pipe, Full MSD ignition, under drive pullies.

Car runs real good I went a 12.12 two weeks ago But since then I've dropped 50lbs off the front and ditched the power steering in favor of a Flaming River rack..

Yeah I currently have 77 jets in the front and 81 in the back So I'm gonna slide some 83's in the back in order to drop that A/F ratio down a bit..

 

B

BillaMustang

Founding Member

Jan 20, 2002

491

0

0

Apr 18, 2004

#4

• Apr 18, 2004

• #4

btt

 

C.Harris

Da Boss

Founding Member

Dec 20, 1998

1,850

0

0

Apr 18, 2004

#5

• Apr 18, 2004

• #5

sounds very strong, why Ford ever dropped the 302 is beyond me, the "deuce" was a great engine for the masses. Its potential, easy to mod capability and longevity are still evident today some 10 years since they were last used in a Mustang

Nice numbers, in a light Fox, you'll surprise late model blown GTs

 

EMW150

Founding Member

May 22, 2000

2,020

1

46

Roaring Spring,PA

Apr 18, 2004

#6

• Apr 18, 2004

• #6

Good job, those are some nice #s for the mods. How do you like the Speed Demon for tuning etc. compared to the Holleys?

 

B

BillaMustang

Founding Member

Jan 20, 2002

491

0

0

Apr 18, 2004

#7

• Apr 18, 2004

• #7

the demon carbs are more difficult to tune. the primary and secondary throttle plates must be set nearly identical. my dad used a dial indicator to set mine.once everything was dialed in, it was a matter of slightly adjusting jetting.
our fuel curve varied from 12.8 at idle to 13.8 at 6200 rpm. the curve was also very flat, which i believe is a good thing.

 

hoss331stang

New Member

Jan 17, 2003

453

0

0

Williamston SC

Apr 18, 2004

#8

• Apr 18, 2004

• #8

what compression u running? i wonder what mine would put down...i only have a 650 double pumper carb tho....it prolly flows like 700 tho because the choke horn and all that is milled off.....i want mine to put down at least 350 at the wheels minimum.....

 

EMW150

Founding Member

May 22, 2000

2,020

1

46

Roaring Spring,PA

Apr 18, 2004

#9

• Apr 18, 2004

• #9

hoss331stang said:

what compression u running? i wonder what mine would put down...i only have a 650 double pumper carb tho....it prolly flows like 700 tho because the choke horn and all that is milled off.....i want mine to put down at least 350 at the wheels minimum.....

Click to expand...

Looking at your sig I'd say around 360 to the wheels with a nice strong torque curve. I used to run the XE274 cam with 10.8:1 compression and it made 374. The XE cams build cylinder pressure like crazy so that'll help your 9.25:1 compression.

 

EMW150

Founding Member

May 22, 2000

2,020

1

46

Roaring Spring,PA

Apr 18, 2004

#10

• Apr 18, 2004

• #10

BillaMustang said:

the demon carbs are more difficult to tune.

Click to expand...

I've heard that before but once you get them figured out they're tough to beat. I've considered trying the race demon but ended it sticking with the good ole holley.

 

M

madonionrs

New Member

Jun 7, 2003

250

0

0

Buffalo NY

Apr 18, 2004

#11

• Apr 18, 2004

• #11

BillaMustang said:

Well the stang put out 310RWHP and 311 foot pounds of torque.

I'm gonna try to attach the image but I dont know how. I have the dyno graph in my e-mail but tryin to get it on here is beyond me..


Well never mind I dont know how to attach an image. But yeah the A/F ratio was at 13.8

Click to expand...

If you email me the graph I can host it.

admin@studentunionboard.net

 

M

madonionrs

New Member

Jun 7, 2003

250

0

0

Buffalo NY

Apr 19, 2004

#12

• Apr 19, 2004

• #12

 

B

BillaMustang

Founding Member

Jan 20, 2002

491

0

0

Apr 19, 2004

#13

• Apr 19, 2004

• #13

Do you guy's think I should richen the A/F ratio? I have 81 jet's in the rear and was deciding on putting either 82's or 83's in the rear..

 

EMW150

Founding Member

May 22, 2000

2,020

1

46

Roaring Spring,PA

Apr 19, 2004

#14

• Apr 19, 2004

• #14

Not sure about the climate in your area but I know here I'd leave it alone. With the weather getting warmer it'll be right where it needs to be.

 

B

BillaMustang

Founding Member

Jan 20, 2002

491

0

0

Apr 20, 2004

#15

• Apr 20, 2004

• #15

Actually On my dyno paper it gave the weather.. It was 77.83*F and 6% humidity.