• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What AFR head setup to get?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IndyBlk5.0
  • Start date Start date Feb 27, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Feb 28, 2004
#21
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #21
pet peve,

software dynos dont mean 'Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me'.

My car made good numbers witht he 165's , Although I think the 330rwhp is a bit inflated, more like 315 Im guessing.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 28, 2004
#22
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #22
grover, can you give me an honest opinion on what i would be putting to the wheels as of right now?
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Feb 28, 2004
#23
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #23
Sorry man, but i really dont know....

I do however thing ARF 165's are the way to go.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 28, 2004
#24
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #24
ok no prob grove, anyone else have any ideas what hp i will be putting down with my current mods?
 
S

SPEED FREAK

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,448
0
0
Regina, SK.
Feb 29, 2004
#25
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #25
I cast my vote at 270 fwhp.... Stock heads are your bottle neck and for the love of god ditch the b - cam . I loath alphabet cams especially that one. But again that is my opinion. However I do think 165's are the way to go UNLESS you fly cut the pistons or get a different set all together. If you do then I vote 185's because you will have more room to grow with and you can use those heads on any SBF engine combo. Admit it you are going to get a 393 windsor someday... might as well bite the bullit and get the heads that will work well with either combo right now; 165's wont be enought to feed the big cube monster your going to build soon . Either way you go though a single pattern cam will work but the B-cam is still going to be a weak link.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Feb 29, 2004
#26
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #26
the B cam would be more of a holdback than the 165s on a 393.

the 165's are a great part!
 

NeQX

Founding Member
Sep 30, 2002
904
0
0
Infront Of You, NY
Feb 29, 2004
#27
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #27
with the B cam and that gt40 manifold you will most likely put 280rwhp fully tuned, just cause B cam isn't optimum and neither is manifold, if you upgraded to a trick flow track heat or a rpm performer 1/2 along with a f303 cam or custom grind you will put out close to 300rwhp, with custom cam def over 300rwhp (and manifold)
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 29, 2004
#28
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #28
i thought the stuff that i had was pretty good... gt40s arent bad when you get the lower ported out... i like the look of them too.. b303 sounds really cool at idle, remember, im not trying to be that fastest stang out there, just something to have fun with
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Feb 29, 2004
#29
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #29
My ported cobra lower works just fine.

If I were to buy a new manifold I would get a performer, the RPM and RPM II are not the best choice on a mainly street driven car.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 29, 2004
#30
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #30
i think if i ever wanted that little bit of extra hp, do you think i could just do a even swap for the two manifolds? (performer)
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Feb 29, 2004
#31
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #31
What I hate about these threads, I read them and start wanting to fill out that credit card application, or just stop eating until I can afford a FTI combo.

I think it is clear, AFR heads are the way to go, the 165's seem to have the best overall power on a NA 3" stroke combo. Custom cams don't cost much more than a OTS comp cam, but perform so much better, so why not just spend a little more and get a lot more.

I kind of think I know what y'all mean by the B cam. I have the B cam, on 1.7's, with a 2* advance. I lost so much drivability, I went out an got a daily driver which I wanted to get anyways, but that is the scope of what it did. The cam sounds really mean, and I like the sound, but the bark is better than the bite. It seems I lost tq below 4000rpm, but when 4000rpm come around it definatly hits, or so it feels like it does... I raced a buddy which it was a close race before and the cam made little difference. Yes I gained, but not much. Then he put a Comp Cam CC305 in his LT1 and tied things up, made a much bigger difference on his Camaro, and the cam is suposed to run on 1.6's and he still has old 1.5's, he just got a twin 52mm tb and is ordering 1.6RR's, now I think I'm going to get pulled. I'm starting to want to get another cam.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 29, 2004
#32
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #32
oh well, us poe folks have to deal with what we have... yeah a custom cam would be nice, but hell i'll take what i can get.... im keeping it and doing little engine upgrades afterwards, ignition , 65mm tbody, little stuff. then to interior , then exterior, i really dont care what the car looks like, i love to drive it so much its fine, (doesnt look bad at all though) plans plans.....
 

runningmole

Founding Member
Jun 24, 2002
1,127
0
36
San Diego, CA
Mar 1, 2004
#33
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #33
Save up. You'll be glad you did. That's what I did and it's going to be worth it. Been a year since I started planning the motor in my sig. Have the parts now...just have to get it put together. Going to be worth it though. At first I was going to do a 347 w/ GT40 irons, E-cam, and Cobra Intake. I think the stuff I saved up to buy and bought is going to perform a hell of a lot better!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
746
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
275
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
C
Fox Need help identifying brake setup
  • Cypher02xd
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
163
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2026
Mustang5L5
R
New heads
  • Robman8028
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
912
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 31, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?