• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

What are pulley's for?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustang gt 2003
  • Start date Start date Jul 19, 2006
M

mustang gt 2003

Member
May 9, 2005
29
0
6
Jul 19, 2006
#1
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #1
Ive read around and got the idea to get a couple new pulley's. Now it says that it should free up to 8-12 horses, but i dont it to effect anything else. Does it... or no? Im totally lost on this subject and really have no idea what i am doing lol.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Jul 19, 2006
#2
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #2
I wont run them because they arent worth the trouble. I am not going to elaborate. You can look into the flame thread in the tech section to why.
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Jul 19, 2006
#3
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #3
they're great at wasting money
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
Jul 19, 2006
#4
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #4
they're a quick 5ish HP, if you aren't ever going to put a blower on they are worth it... if its gonna be a couple years before putting a blower on they might be worth it...

Some people have problems and some don't. I've never had issues with my Steedas.
 

02FastblackGT

New Member
Mar 12, 2006
64
0
0
Tucson, AZ
Jul 19, 2006
#5
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #5
The underdrive pullies relieve tension on the normal belt/pully system, allowing the engine to spin the pullies with less effort, therefore releasing roughly 5-10 hp. Modified Mustang pulled out 12hp from a 99 Cobra. The pullies are basically a direct bolt-in, though special tools are required. Some people choose not to use the appropriate tools, especially for the crank pully, which has led to some major damage, therefore giving the pullies a bad name. My friend has the steedas on his 03 GT, and has had no problems. Also, said he could feel the difference too. He described it as the difference between having your air conditioning on & then turning it off. I want to get a set of the steedas, but there are deffinetly other mods that would produce more power/be more functional.
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Jul 19, 2006
#6
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #6
I've never had any issues with my steeda u/d pulleys, but as far as gains I wouldn't know.. they were on the car when I bought it
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jul 19, 2006
#7
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #7
buy an upper plenum or an OR X pipe. you will get more performance out of either of them
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Jul 19, 2006
#8
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #8
SaleenGT2001 said:
buy an upper plenum or an OR X pipe. you will get more performance out of either of them
Click to expand...


+1 on the mid pipe over pullies
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Jul 19, 2006
#9
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #9
02FastblackGT said:
The underdrive pullies relieve tension on the normal belt/pully system, allowing the engine to spin the pullies with less effort, therefore releasing roughly 5-10 hp. Modified Mustang pulled out 12hp from a 99 Cobra. The pullies are basically a direct bolt-in, though special tools are required. Some people choose not to use the appropriate tools, especially for the crank pully, which has led to some major damage, therefore giving the pullies a bad name.
Click to expand...
So you are saying Al Papito of Boss 330 Racing who has built hundreds of modular motors including Bob Cosby's F/S motor that set numerous world records for his class installed them wrong? Ed Olin who was the lead engineer in the 5.4 DOHC design for the 00R and covered the negative effect of uncontrolled harmonic vibration several times Ed's post on Harmonicsand you are saying he is wrong? What about Joe Lynch, John Mihovetz(the fastest Mod motor racer out there today and one of the most knowledgable), are wrong? Please stop putting out BS and learn to find the real data from the real racers and engine builders who do this day in and day out.

For those that really want to learn, read this thread and pay attention to Boss330, Big Top GT and others.
Here
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=811587

and here
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=475554


and here is another
http://corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=548311
Mainly this post on the above thread
Boss330 said:
The failed pump rotors are a symptom of bigger problems. The flats on the crank drive the pump in one direction only. That is the case but why are there witness marks on all four corners? . (This was pointed out by EDO sometime ago)
The inner rotor fits loosely ..Almost floating on the crank. The problem is uncontrolled torsional vibration. And yes...Billet rotors will beat deep depressions into the flat drive surfaces of the crank. Probably not always the fault of the hard rotors, As almost every engine that has Billet rotors also has a small dia underdrive damper or a POS piggyback pulley.
After building truckloads of modular engines a pattern has emerged. Most all oil pump failures involve underdrive pulleys and raised rpm limiters. There is alot of harmonic vibration on the front of mod. cranks. The small dia. dampers do not adequetely control the vibration. The results of this vibration can be seen on the crank where the oil pump rotors contact the flats on the crank. At some point the oil pump rotors shatter like glass.
It appears that if you want your engine to live a happy life keep your stock vibration damper/pulleys.
If you must ...March offers large dia p/s and alternator pulleys that were used on the '00Cobra R designed to work with the stock damper. One thing's for sure...Anything i build that revs past 7200 is wearing a ATI Damper.
Click to expand...

Folks before you flame away, read the threads and take in what the Guys who been there, done that have to say.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Jul 19, 2006
#10
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #10
blackfang said:
So you are saying Al Papito of Boss 330 Racing who has built hundreds of modular motors including Bob Cosby's F/S motor that set numerous world records for his class installed them wrong? Ed Olin who was the lead engineer in the 5.4 DOHC design for the 00R and covered the negative effect of uncontrolled harmonic vibration several times Ed's post on Harmonicsand you are saying he is wrong? What about Joe Lynch, John Mihovetz(the fastest Mod motor racer out there today and one of the most knowledgable), are wrong? Please stop putting out BS and learn to find the real data from the real racers and engine builders who do this day in and day out.

For those that really want to learn, read this thread and pay attention to Boss330, Big Top GT and others.
Here
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=811587

and here
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=475554


and here is another
http://corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=548311
Mainly this post on the above thread


Folks before you flame away, read the threads and take in what the Guys who been there, done that have to say.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should have pointed out that these failures were occuring on engines that were turning 7000+ rpm, and that in most cases do not cause a problem.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Jul 19, 2006
#11
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #11
What are these pulleys you speak of? Will they make my car go faster? Would I need a tune after installing them?
 

Orange...

New Member
Aug 22, 2004
59
0
0
SASKATOON
Jul 19, 2006
#12
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #12
were those the same stock 4.6L motors that others are intalling these pullies on? It seems not from what I read these were all heavily modified 5.4's and 4.6dohc's.

I have not seen the same damage on stock or near stock vehicles (which most peole have here).

I'm not saying this isn't true, I have read enough of what was said and proven to see that there was a relation to the product and the result, however these that were stated were on motors that I feel are in a different "class" then most here...

I have had no problems with mine, nor have a personally seen problems.
 

02FastblackGT

New Member
Mar 12, 2006
64
0
0
Tucson, AZ
Jul 19, 2006
#13
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #13
Blackfang:

I wasn't saying that the only damage being done by pullies were caused by incorrect installation, and I certainly wasn't saying that they were "wrong". I was just trying to explain to the typical Mustang owner, with the usual list of bolt-on's, the pro's/con's of these pullies (as far as I know). I wasn't talking crap or saying that the only bad things that happen are a direct result of incorrect installation, I was just trying to make it so this guy could relate to what he has done on his Mustang (not a 5.4L built engine) and then apply what I had to say into helping him learn about the pullies/decide if he would consider buying them. There's really no need for you to get your panties in a bunch, and go on a huge rant.
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Jul 19, 2006
#14
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #14
Pulleys aren't a bad mod for the price. They're cheap and free up some horsepower though will take some power away from accessories but shouldn't be a problem unless you have a large audio system/videos and all the other "bling".
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Jul 19, 2006
#15
  • Jul 19, 2006
  • #15
Kilgore Trout said:
What are these pulleys you speak of? Will they make my car go faster? Would I need a tune after installing them?
Click to expand...


i believe that they are called under drive pullies, they will defenately make your car faster...... and you will need a tune to get 50 HP out of them along with the sticker which adds another 50Hp
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Jul 20, 2006
#16
  • Jul 20, 2006
  • #16
jstreet0204 said:
Maybe you should have pointed out that these failures were occuring on engines that were turning 7000+ rpm, and that in most cases do not cause a problem.
Click to expand...
And none of us shift at 7,000 rpm? I know I do on my car. Just like alot of Cobra owners do. How many people just add bolt ons and bolt ons and tune the car, removing the stock limiter? That is the nature of this game, you mod, mod and mod some more. Next thing you know his motor isnt stock anymore. The problem here is people try and educate and then others criticize it. That is whay alot of these professisonals stop coming to post. They try and help and no one really wants to listen.

3 of the named failures happen at 7k, doesnt mean they all did. Heck Bob Cosbys car only sees 7k at the 1-2 shift and the rest is 6500ish. Bob Cosbys engine is a 4.6, Factory Stock engine which means it pretty much was a bolt on engine. Joe Lynch had a 4.6 when it happened as did Carlos Nazeriano(if I recall)

Lets forget about the fact that it has happen and could it happen to others as well. Like I said for the price, and the potential negative effects, it's not worth the money when it can be spent elswhere going faster. Not all the motors were built 5.4's either
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Jul 20, 2006
#17
  • Jul 20, 2006
  • #17
blackfang said:
And none of us shift at 7,000 rpm? I know I do on my car. Just like alot of Cobra owners do. How many people just add bolt ons and bolt ons and tune the car, removing the stock limiter? That is the nature of this game, you mod, mod and mod some more. Next thing you know his motor isnt stock anymore. The problem here is people try and educate and then others criticize it. That is whay alot of these professisonals stop coming to post. They try and help and no one really wants to listen.

3 of the named failures happen at 7k, doesnt mean they all did. Heck Bob Cosbys car only sees 7k at the 1-2 shift and the rest is 6500ish. Bob Cosbys engine is a 4.6, Factory Stock engine which means it pretty much was a bolt on engine. Joe Lynch had a 4.6 when it happened as did Carlos Nazeriano(if I recall)

Lets forget about the fact that it has happen and could it happen to others as well. Like I said for the price, and the potential negative effects, it's not worth the money when it can be spent elswhere going faster. Not all the motors were built 5.4's either
Click to expand...

My point being 95 percent of the people on this with 2v motors are not shifting higher than 6k because they don't make any power past that. Thousands of people have no issues with ud pullies. So if you are "Trying to educate" give all the facts. If you are planning on building a high reving race motor stay away from pullies. If you are the average guy on this board who wants to max out bolt ons and nothing more, then they aren't a problem if installed right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
2004 Roush - Dome Lights and radio not working
  • Yurei
  • Nov 10, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
491
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
squeak93
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
993
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 7, 2026
2v_johnny
2
W
Speedometer and shifting issues
  • wyatt-tetro891
  • Aug 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
223
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 18, 2026
wyatt-tetro891
W
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
970
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?