• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What can an 8" Rearend handle?How about a 9"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mean67302
  • Start date Start date Jul 6, 2004
M

Mean67302

New Member
Jul 6, 2004
34
0
0
Northern NY
Jul 6, 2004
#1
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #1
First off I am new here so hi.I own a 1967 Mustang with the stock 8" rear and 3 speed manual.I am sorry to say but I also own a Camaro.(I am one of the people who like both ford and chevy and yes,it is probally a rare case )But anyway.........

I have a 8 inch rear which I believe to be stock in my 1967 Mustang.I am going to make this car into a high performance car thats also a good cruiser.(good on gas and RPM's)Well anyway how much torque and horsepower can a 8 inch stand up to.If it will stand up to a good amount of power I am just going to get a limited slip differental with 3.55:1 gears and etc.from mustangs plus.If not I might have to get a 9 inch.

Thanks
Ron
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Jul 6, 2004
#2
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #2
Traction is more important than torque/HP.

A stock conventional 9" with crappy tires would handle 500hp no problem. But a locked 9" running slicks is a whole other story.

Same goes for the 8"

Are you planning on running an open/conventional axle? How about slicks?

I'd say an 8" open rear end running typical street tires is probably good up until about 250 RWHP.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jul 6, 2004
#3
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #3
supposedly the axles are the weak link in both the 8" and 9" assuming you have 28 splines. However, I have broken 3 8" differentials and haven't phased a 28 spline axle yet. Traction, torque, and shock are the main contributors to failure. A 9" was the logical solution for me and I haven't had any problems. When you consider that Ford never used a 8" in anything with more than 225 hp, there shouldn't be much to question. With a 8", durability will be the deciding factor, you can baby it around all the time and granny shift to keep the rear from grenading or you can go ahead and upgrade to a 9" and never have to worry about it.
 
M

Mean67302

New Member
Jul 6, 2004
34
0
0
Northern NY
Jul 6, 2004
#4
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #4
Well I wasn't going to run slicks I was probally going to run Radial T/A's.Also I would get a posi differental with most likly 3.55:1 rear gears and definitly some waaaaaaayyyyyyyy stronger axles and everything else as long as it would hold up but right now its sounding like I should get a 9".......
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 6, 2004
#5
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #5
I tend to agree with what's been posted.
Traction will kill an 8" in an instant.
No traction will give it a slow death over about 250 rwhp.
I have to disagree on the axles though. I have broken 3 or so 8" rears, but it is always the diff or gears that broke for me. The axles are the same 28 splines that are in the 9". The 68-up carrier is fairly strong. Your 67 might have the old 8" carrier, no vertical ribs, it is supposed to be weak.
Shorter gears will also weaken your 8". The engine has more torque multiplication and the gear is weaker the lower you go.
I found it very easy to break an 8" with 4.11s, but I have had complete destruction with a 3.00 as well... Just a guess, I was running around 325 rwhp through a toploader.
I think by the time you buy all the parts to beef up an 8", you could build a very mild 9". The 9" parts are everywhere and reasonably priced, the 8" stuff requires some looking and costs more because they are not nearly as popular as the 9".
Make sense?
Dave
 
6

65stang289

New Member
Mar 5, 2003
922
0
0
Fort walton Beach FL.
Jul 6, 2004
#6
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #6
you see my setup in the sig I would be lucky if Iam pushing 300hp but some how I blew up my spider gears. In my 9inch that had 3.25 in it. So I put a locker in and a set of 3.73's in. Iam very happy now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
579
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
Fuel Fuel Pump Rewire, New Fuel Lines, and Installation of New Fuel Pump Hanger with AN6 Connections
  • AeroCoupe
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
13K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 16, 2023
AeroCoupe
Granada Front Disc, 9” Drum Rear, 86 Bronco II MC, and Manual Brakes - Pedal Slack
  • AeroCoupe
  • Jul 8, 2023
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2023
AeroCoupe
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?