• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What carb do you guys use?

  • Thread starter Thread starter steel1212
  • Start date Start date Jul 21, 2004
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Jul 21, 2004
#1
  • Jul 21, 2004
  • #1
I currently have a holley 600 1850 ( I think). I was thinking of upgrading to a newer holley 650 double pumper good/bad? I have the following:

79 302 bored .060
comp cam 232 duration 280 advertised (with kit that has springs retainers etc.)
performer rpm intake (that has been gapped)
pretty much stock heads from what I can tell
comp magnum roller tipped rocker arms
t-5 tranny

any suggestions on if the 650 would be to much, not enough. This car will be a summer driver but not driven to far maybe 5 miles a day or so and a little more on the weekends. Fuel economy doesn't mean much to me...I didn't buy the stang to sip gas I bought it to guzzle it
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 21, 2004
#2
  • Jul 21, 2004
  • #2
It will work fine.
It will require plenty of fine tuning.
Even if it is 'super tuned', it will still use alot more fuel in regular driving.
You are safe with your combo up to about a 750 DP depending on your rear gear IMO.
I ran a similar setup and had best luck with the 750 DP.
The biggest difference is my heads were stock, but warmed over pretty good.
Good luck
Dave
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Jul 21, 2004
#3
  • Jul 21, 2004
  • #3
The 650 DP would be fine.

I'm using the same carb on my 347.
 

mfp4073

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2001
387
0
38
Hells Ditch, FL
Jul 22, 2004
#4
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #4
Using a 650 double. And yeah...I am convinced that they require some sort of voodoo ritual to tune. I have mine pretty close. Once tuned they KICK BUTT! Just require some work!
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jul 22, 2004
#5
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #5
650 or more on a 302 is really large, according to Holley. Off-idle bog and reduced fuel economy are the consequences of running a large carb. But hey, when you're revving to 8500 the 650 will keep up just fine.

Of course if you aren't stroking the motor or revving sky high, the extra carb size will just make it tougher to get the motor to run well.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 22, 2004
#6
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #6
The 650 DP will do fine. Tuning? Never had problems getting one tuned. When you say stock heads, which stock heads are you talking about? The 79 heads will have the largest chambers( 70 cc's) of all the small block heads, swapping to something like a set of early 289 heads( 54 cc's) will give your compression a big boost and allow your cam to perform much better.
 

BlueMonster65

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2001
385
0
16
Connecticut
Jul 22, 2004
#7
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #7
I switched from a Holley to a Demon 625. and it was the best engine mod i did. the road demon 625 is perfect for a slightly modified 302 such as yours
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
763
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Fox What replacement window channel molding do you guys use on an early Fox?
  • CtCarl
  • Aug 30, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 2, 2020
Blown88GT
C
What do you think???
  • Clodracer1000
  • Mar 19, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
917
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2018
Steel1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?