• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

What Clutch are you 650+rw guys Using?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4Jenna
  • Start date Start date Jan 21, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Wi Stang

Member
Jun 27, 2004
248
0
16
Fountain City, WI
Jan 22, 2007
#21
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #21
Heh... real street racers. As opposed to fake street racers?
Click to expand...

I imagine when Killercanary said real street racers, he was talking about the NMRA Real Street class.

BTW Vipersix, looks like from your sig you should have a hell of a setup when you get it running.
 

Vipersix

Founding Member
Feb 25, 2001
434
0
0
Clarksville, TN
Jan 22, 2007
#22
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #22
Wi Stang said:
I imagine when Killercanary said real street racers, he was talking about the NMRA Real Street class.

BTW Vipersix, looks like from your sig you should have a hell of a setup when you get it running.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah... don't I feel like a dummy. I forget that most people don't build a car that doesn't fit into any category but Open Comp.

Yeah I'm pretty excited about this setup if I can ever get it finished. It'll be pretty unique so you can't possibly miss it at WFC or NMRA or wherever I end up racing at.
 

Wi Stang

Member
Jun 27, 2004
248
0
16
Fountain City, WI
Jan 22, 2007
#23
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #23
eades5.0
I actually got a modified clutch
Spec Stg 4+
Click to expand...

If you don't mind me asking what consists of the 4+ clutch?

I am going to take a guess it is the stage 4 pressure plate with the stage 3+ full face clutch disk? I guess I am just curious
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 23, 2007
#24
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #24
Wi Stang said:
I imagine when Killercanary said real street racers, he was talking about the NMRA Real Street class.
Click to expand...


Correct!



Chris, what are the specs on the clutch you got in terms of its design, material, holding capacity, etc?
 

94gts

Member
Jul 4, 2004
873
0
16
Carmel, New York
Jan 23, 2007
#25
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #25
i love spec
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 23, 2007
#26
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #26
Remember to break the clutch in correctly or it's ruined. Should be a sticker on the box about taking it easy for 300-500 miles. Mine chattered like crazy but went away around 300 miles later. I still hate it though. Spec clutches suck.
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
Jan 23, 2007
#27
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #27
Just fwiw I have a McLeod street twin in my car, and it came with it installed. It has ~ 40k miles on it and from the previous owner had 350-450rwhp through it, with a decent amount of racing. Its still holding strong and is still streetable to slip. It has never chattered for me and is prob about 25% more effort than a regular dual friction mcleod clutch.

They are pricey though, but its prob what I'll go with next time.

I've heard alot of knowledgable guys say that the spec stg 3's are too harsh engaging, and they tend to find any weak spot in the driveline. I like that the street twin allows a tiny bit of slip but also can handle 600+hp.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Jan 24, 2007
#28
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #28
VibrantRedGT said:
Remember to break the clutch in correctly or it's ruined. Should be a sticker on the box about taking it easy for 300-500 miles. Mine chattered like crazy but went away around 300 miles later. I still hate it though. Spec clutches suck.
Click to expand...

Thxs Vibe..didnt know that....good grief..hahaha

My clutch is basically a modified Stg 3+ full faced disc made of carbon semi-metallic which can handle 800 plus ft lbs. The reg 4 is a puck style like the reg 3, so they call the modified 3+ a 4+
A reg stg 4 is only rated at 680 ft lbs.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Jan 24, 2007
#29
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #29
The old Spec 3 6 puck stlye do suck for the record

I cant belive someone would run that in a street car....6 puck..lol but they did re-vamp them to cure the welding themselves to flywheel issues. haha
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Jan 24, 2007
#30
  • Jan 24, 2007
  • #30
As Chris and I discussed. Peak TQ # is not the only way to look at clutch holding ability. Where the TQ comes in is important. If I had a roots blower making 800 tq at 2000 I would need a clutch that could take the motor tq AND accelerating of the car from a stand still. Car weight has alot to do with it. A heavy car with stickey tires offers much more resistance on getting the drive traim mass moving.

Guys are roasting clutch

With my new motor the peak tq is above 5000 with the it being motor alone on launch.

For me I can get away with my Spec III+ for now. Chris makes alot more TQ at a lower rpm.

Him and his Damn turbo
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Spec Stage 2 Plus Premature Clutch Failure
  • Saberstang
  • May 2, 2017
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 4, 2017
Saberstang
B
  • Locked
Expired 2000 GT Track HPDE car
  • bossman429
  • Feb 23, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
20K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 13, 2013
bossman429
B
  • Locked
SOLD 1995 Twin-Turbo 6-spd
  • FastDriver
  • Jan 16, 2012
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
10
Views
8K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Sep 18, 2012
FastDriver
M
centerforce clutch 6 month life span!?!?!?!?!
  • mustangphilly
  • Sep 15, 2009
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
1
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Sep 15, 2009
mustangphilly
M
86-95 5.0L Clutch Swap Help
  • 5spd GT
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
15K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 10, 2009
oldskolbus
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?