• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

what ever happened with the volvo DOHC swap?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shinlee
  • Start date Start date Sep 26, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
F

FknBadFkr

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
76
0
0
Charleston,SC
Nov 7, 2006
#41
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #41
im willing to do so but itll take a lil more time i have to do all the work using others tools till i move
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Nov 7, 2006
#42
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #42
would one work on a DP 2.3?
 
F

FknBadFkr

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
76
0
0
Charleston,SC
Nov 12, 2006
#43
  • Nov 12, 2006
  • #43
yeah it will fit any turbo or non turbo 2.3 Ford iron block
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Nov 12, 2006
#44
  • Nov 12, 2006
  • #44
i think he is asking if you would be able to route the exhaust side wires and plugs if you did the DOHC swap. I'm curious as well, see'ing how i have a 92 2.3 DP n/a motor i would like to modify as well as a 2.3T i'd like to do the swap to as well
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Nov 12, 2006
#45
  • Nov 12, 2006
  • #45
Shinlee said:
i think he is asking if you would be able to route the exhaust side wires and plugs if you did the DOHC swap. I'm curious as well, see'ing how i have a 92 2.3 DP n/a motor i would like to modify as well as a 2.3T i'd like to do the swap to as well
Click to expand...
exactly
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Nov 13, 2006
#46
  • Nov 13, 2006
  • #46
I doubt the gains it would bring on an N/A motor would be worth the cost.
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Nov 14, 2006
#47
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #47
never know unless ya try it first!
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Nov 14, 2006
#48
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #48
You guys crack me up...don't you think if you don't know what to do with the extra set of plug wires when converting from 8 plugs to 4 (which is the SMALLEST of problems you would be dealing with) then you may be a little ahead of yourselves?

Not slammin', just making an observation...
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Nov 14, 2006
#49
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #49
I am dohc ignorant, I am sure I can get around the extra set of plug wires, I've seen write ups on it for turbo purposes, but you never really know unless you ask. lemme put on my flame suit. I know I am gonna catch hell for being so ignorant.
 
S

speedytang

Founding Member
Jul 28, 1999
765
1
17
Marengo,Ohio,US
Nov 14, 2006
#50
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #50
Using a Cosworth Twin/Cam head from the 70's on a 2.0 made 250hp. No Turbo on my Dads '67 Sunbeam Alpine that he converted back in the Mid-70's using a Pinto 2.0 engine. The Volvo head looks about the same as the Cosworth head.
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Nov 14, 2006
#51
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #51
lol, when i get this done, it will first be on a turboblock, and i will also be paying fknbadfkr to do it too, lol i know i cant do it
 
F

FknBadFkr

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
76
0
0
Charleston,SC
Nov 18, 2006
#52
  • Nov 18, 2006
  • #52
i figure with standalone even on a NA engine the Volvo head should be a great upgrade...the flow #s are way higher then stock, The ARCA NA engines are around 310-320 HP and this out flows up to 400 lift. I know the ARCA uses a lot bigger cam to get that power and this would drop off some but hell with some work a 185-200HP street NA motor is not of the question with the Volvo head 2.3................Hal
 
F

FknBadFkr

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
76
0
0
Charleston,SC
Mar 12, 2007
#53
  • Mar 12, 2007
  • #53
It runs, ran very nice and smooth ,something has to be wrong..LMAO had an oil leak issue and fixed it so now i just have to add teh Intercooler pipes then ill let you all know how it handles boost and take a few videos.........Hal
 
I

itsstock

New Member
Mar 11, 2007
16
0
0
Mar 12, 2007
#54
  • Mar 12, 2007
  • #54
Hal,

Please keep us all updated. I am interested in this modification as well. I am pleased to see that the 2.3 community has options other than the overpriced head that Essie sells. Thank you for sharing the knowledge!
 
F

FknBadFkr

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
76
0
0
Charleston,SC
Mar 15, 2007
#55
  • Mar 15, 2007
  • #55
well i have a setback..its all my fault. I didnt have the tensioner set on the timing belt just had the pulley tightend holding it...well the engine back fired and jumped time..i should have it back together this weekend a few new intake valves and YAY!!!..lol............Hal
 
I

itsstock

New Member
Mar 11, 2007
16
0
0
Mar 18, 2007
#56
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #56
Woah that's not good. I read up on a guy that did something similar. He had the timing set wrong and the engine pretty much blew up. #4 piston was gone and the block had holes that it should not have had.


Did you do all the weld work on the head yourself? Mainly around the areas where it is short when bolted down to the block? And did it have to be milled to make sure it did not warp because of the welding? Thanks! Please post up pictures when you get the chance.
 
F

FknBadFkr

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
76
0
0
Charleston,SC
Mar 18, 2007
#57
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #57
I friend of mine welded it for me..i made the block, fiteed everything and after welding i milled it flat again. luckily it didnt kill a piston just bent 2 intake valves. the belt was loose and someone was helping and change my timing (i can phase the dizzy from my computer) and well they went too far and it back fired and spun backwards. when it did that it jumped time and stopped...hell itll still run back in time but it spits fire out the intake..LMAO...Ill have it fixed when money comes back. i lost 3grand becouse someone wrote me a bum check and im not working for now so the car is my last worry............Hal
 
M

magicstang

New Member
Mar 18, 2007
3
0
0
Ohio
Mar 18, 2007
#58
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #58
dohc cost

someone just wrote 1500 for this mod are you guys building these or is this an estimated number ????
 
F

FknBadFkr

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
76
0
0
Charleston,SC
Mar 22, 2007
#59
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #59
I am the one saying 1500.00 for a whole kit....Hal
 
F

Fuzzylogic

New Member
May 8, 2005
42
0
0
Albany, OR
May 5, 2007
#60
  • May 5, 2007
  • #60
Drool.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
751
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
J
Switched to e85 on the 3v and now it won't run right.
  • jcowdough
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
171
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
617
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
J
Car Diagnosis
  • j.2016
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
3
Views
337
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 31, 2025
Noobz347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
221
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?