• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

What Gears To Go With?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ernad
  • Start date Start date Jul 28, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Ernad

celibate sans pants
Apr 2, 2004
0
1
0
Grand Rapids, MI
Jul 29, 2005
#21
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #21





N00Bz! Someone this.




ProCharger GT said:
This thread is a joke everyone calm down
Click to expand...
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Jul 29, 2005
#22
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #22
Give Me TP said:
Go here: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=563484

This was already hashed over ad nauseum
Click to expand...

Ya I had checked that out [Thanks! ] and I'm not saying that the stock gearing is better than the 4.10's when it comes to racing, or around town driving. I'm simply saying that out on the highway, with the cruise set at 70mph, there will be less engine wear and better mileage with the 3.27's. If 90% of a persons driving is highway [like me] then maybe 4.10's may not be the best choice. If most of your driving is around town, then deffinitly get the 4.10's.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Jul 29, 2005
#23
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #23
CanadaStang said:
Ya I had checked that out [Thanks! ] and I'm not saying that the stock gearing is better than the 4.10's when it comes to racing, or around town driving. I'm simply saying that out on the highway, with the cruise set at 70mph, there will be less engine wear and better mileage with the 3.27's. If 90% of a persons driving is highway [like me] then maybe 4.10's may not be the best choice. If most of your driving is around town, then deffinitly get the 4.10's.
Click to expand...

I would agree with that. If all you ever did was highway driving, then the extra rpm would increase engine wear, but I don't know how substantial it would be since highway driving is easier on an engine anyway. The argument in the other thread was that steeper gears also decreased load on the engine and drivetrain during take off and around town driving, so I think for most people it probably equals out.
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Jul 29, 2005
#24
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #24
Personally, I would rather have 150,000 fun miles with 4.10s than 175,000 not as fun miles with stock gears.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Jul 29, 2005
#25
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #25
Give Me TP said:
Personally, I would rather have 150,000 fun miles with 4.10s than 175,000 not as fun miles with stock gears.
Click to expand...

Ya that's a good point. Besides, I think I'd look kinda stupid telling someone with 4.10's: " Ya sure you beat me, but I bet in 10 years if we both did all our driving on the highway, my engine would have less wear"
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Jul 29, 2005
#26
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #26
This question will never have an end to it . just get whatever gears you want
 

shiftless

New Member
Oct 11, 2001
12
0
0
attalla, AL
Jul 29, 2005
#27
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #27
Where'd you get the 3900 RPM figure from? My engine turns around 2500-2600 RPMs at 70. That's not really a lot, and I lost maybe 1 or 2 MPG over the 3.27s. That leads me to believe that with 3.73s or 4.10s you could actually get *better* mileage, which from what I've heard, is true.
 

Ernad

celibate sans pants
Apr 2, 2004
0
1
0
Grand Rapids, MI
Jul 29, 2005
#28
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #28
OMG, you people
 

squares98

Member
Aug 20, 2004
852
0
17
Orange,ca
Jul 29, 2005
#29
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #29
3.73's if you dont go to the track. If I ever went to the track, I would like 4.10's
 

Ernad

celibate sans pants
Apr 2, 2004
0
1
0
Grand Rapids, MI
Jul 29, 2005
#30
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #30
I feel I should tell you this

THIS WHOLE ****ING THREAD IS A DAMN JOKE SO STOP POSTING IN IT AS IF IT WERE SERIOUS.










Thank You.
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Jul 29, 2005
#31
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #31
No
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jul 29, 2005
#32
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #32
3.73s are perfectly fine. In a race, the difference between the 2 gears would be VERY small. Look at all these cars with 4.10s...are their times any better than us with 3.73s? You wont tell a difference at the track. If anything, on street tires 4.10s will hurt your times due to wheel spin in 1st and 2nd gear. JMO. Go with whichever you want. Believe me, you wont miss 4.10s if you go 3.73s....I dont . Its enough gear, and good highway rpm to boot.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Jul 29, 2005
#33
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #33
shiftless said:
Where'd you get the 3900 RPM figure from? My engine turns around 2500-2600 RPMs at 70. That's not really a lot, and I lost maybe 1 or 2 MPG over the 3.27s. That leads me to believe that with 3.73s or 4.10s you could actually get *better* mileage, which from what I've heard, is true.
Click to expand...

Whoops!! I ment 2000rpms with the 3.27's and 2640rpms with 4.30's. I figured out 4th and 5th gears for comparison and accidently posted the 4th gear figures.
My bad
 

04gtdrop

New Member
Jun 10, 2005
532
0
0
Sac, CA
Jul 29, 2005
#34
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #34
Danre said:
I have a 2004 Stang and am wanting to do gears. But I can't decide on which. The car is a manual, and I don't know if I should go with 3.73s or 4.10s. Any suggestions?
Click to expand...


LOL , here we go again. look up the thread 3.73's vs 4.10's

i bought 3.73's but this will be a big debate
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Jul 29, 2005
#35
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #35
He's the one that started it!

And then went with 3.73s in spite of all reasoning!

MODERATORS...BAN HIM!!!
 

Ernad

celibate sans pants
Apr 2, 2004
0
1
0
Grand Rapids, MI
Jul 29, 2005
#36
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #36
Give Me TP said:
He's the one that started it!

And then went with 3.73s in spite of all reasoning!

MODERATORS...BAN HIM!!!
Click to expand...
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Jul 29, 2005
#37
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #37
The thread within this thread that is...all credit must of course go to you Danre, for starting this one

MODERATORS!!! BAN HIM TOO!!!
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jul 29, 2005
#38
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #38
How bout we ban Mr Butt head (or is that beavis?...dont watch that).
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Jul 29, 2005
#39
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #39
IM JUST LMAO READING THIS
 
B

BobbyF

New Member
May 30, 2005
6
0
0
Jul 29, 2005
#40
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #40
I have tried a lot of different gears on the track and as a general rule, if you are running less than 400 RWHP then the 4.10 or higher work a little better. If you are running over 400 RWHP then the 3.73 gears will give you quicker ET slips as you will tend to run out of engine RPM in the real power range. Also, on the street, you will have a very difficult time planting the power with gears higher than 3.73; just make a lot of smoke and watch the other guy pull away.

Bobby F
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
135
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
9
Will I feel a difference
  • 90Stanger302
  • Mar 12, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
259
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
Noobz347
K
Drivetrain '87 5.0 Installing New Ring Gear and Pinion - Pattern Questions
  • karhoot
  • Apr 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
382
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 9, 2026
Mindseye007
M
4.10 gears = 200,000 miles ?
  • michaelleewebb
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
215
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 2, 2026
michaelleewebb
M
Rear diff rebuild opinions
  • MrPerfect2
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
206
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?