• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What intake will best complete my combo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 87GT 306
  • Start date Start date Sep 12, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

1EVIL88VERT

New Member
Jul 12, 2004
314
0
0
Dyess AFB, TX
Sep 13, 2005
#21
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #21
think i'm gonna agree with tmoss on this one....
 
G

Grunter

Founding Member
May 16, 2001
151
0
17
Ontario,Canada
Sep 13, 2005
#22
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #22
Tmoss - I don't see generalization in a 266,AFR's 165 and an RPM11. This is pretty darn specific if you ask me! I did not test his combo - I said I've seen it tested many times! Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords has had many different variations and Westech Dyno as well. Richard Holderner's book dyno sessions shows it clearly!

Well tuned - this package is very stout(400+hp) I've seen a bit less - but usually cleaned up with fuel pressure, timing adjustments!

By the way - I like your set up as well, I was thinking if not AFR's then GT40P's well prepped as you seem to have them. I hear getting good headers is difficult. And 4 degrees advanced seems to help things with the stock cam.

Depending on cam choices - I have seen GT40P's in the elevens! It's a worth while set-up by far!

Anyway, please let me know Tmoss how you do/fare with your combo - it's one I've had my eye on for a bit! That one and the 266......

87GT let me know how you run as well! Take care guys!
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 13, 2005
#23
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #23
Grunter said:
Tmoss - I don't see generalization in a 266,AFR's 165 and an RPM11. This is pretty darn specific if you ask me! I did not test his combo - I said I've seen it tested many times! Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords has had many different variations and Westech Dyno as well. Richard Holderner's book dyno sessions shows it clearly!

Well tuned - this package is very stout(400+hp) I've seen a bit less - but usually cleaned up with fuel pressure, timing adjustments!
Click to expand...

OK, but did they test those combos with other intakes to see which one was best of the bunch? Would they use a custom ported intake? Propbably not on both counts. Will it work well - probably. Is it the best one for the job? - maybe.

You know what we REALLY need? A magazine that does not have to tip-toe around the issue of stepping on advertisers toes to create worthwhile tech articles and tests. Anybody remeber Cars Illustrated and Tony Defeo and Steve Collison and Neil Van Oppre? No politics in that rag - raw language, fun projects and truthful reporting not bound to just manufacturer items. I miss it to this day.


Grunter said:
By the way - I like your set up as well, I was thinking if not AFR's then GT40P's well prepped as you seem to have them. I hear getting good headers is difficult. And 4 degrees advanced seems to help things with the stock cam.

Depending on cam choices - I have seen GT40P's in the elevens! It's a worth while set-up by far!

Anyway, please let me know Tmoss how you do/fare with your combo - it's one I've had my eye on for a bit! That one and the 266......
Click to expand...

I carried peak HP without much nosing over at all through 5,500 rpm where the operator stopped it short . I like the combo VERY much. I have instant access to mega-torque across the rpm band for what it is. It's almost too much for the 9.8" contact patch tires I run in normal driving. My stock SD cam has valve events VERY close to the baby Crower 15510 cam - just has less lift @ .47X" lift. I'm about done with it as I drive this car a LOT and i want to retain driveability. I also want to stick with Ford parts just cause I'm old school at heart - mod what the factory gives you. F/S blood runs in my viens I guess.
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Sep 14, 2005
#24
  • Sep 14, 2005
  • #24
tmoss said:
You know what we REALLY need? A magazine that does not have to tip-toe around the issue of stepping on advertisers toes to create worthwhile tech articles and tests.
Click to expand...
Amen brother I don't think I would ever see my combo make the mags as a tech or as a dyno run for that exact reason. Alot of people will do like I did. I have shown my dyno sheet before and I believe Tmoss liked it. My torque curve was great. I made 366hp and 393 torque on the wheels with an Explorer intake that was ported. Lets see a mag show an intake test of that.
 
8

87GT 306

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
260
0
0
Springfield MA
Sep 15, 2005
#25
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #25
As of right now all that has really been done to it was a gasket match to the AFR's. Tmoss- you port the whole thing through from what Ive seen on your website. As soon as the car is off the road this fall I'm 90% sure that Ill be sending you my lower.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 15, 2005
#26
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #26
Gasket Matching is not worth a whole lot and can actually hurt if certain conditions exist after doing the match. I shape the runner for the best "effective" cross section to increase flow across the rpm band.
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Sep 15, 2005
#27
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #27
fwiw, I really think the gt40 intake is the best of the bunch. For specific combos, yes other things can beat it, but generally Ive seen that the gt40 gives great power all over. and it looks cool.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Sep 15, 2005
#28
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #28
Tmoss is spot on with what hes saying.

Just because its peak horse power is better doesnt make it faster.
 
8

87GT 306

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
260
0
0
Springfield MA
Sep 16, 2005
#29
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #29
One of the 5.0 magazines recently did another intake shootout and the GT-40 had the best overall numbers. It makes pretty decent torque also, so Im going to keep it.
 
P

Pat12p

New Member
Jun 21, 2005
4
0
0
mass
Sep 16, 2005
#30
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #30
just hit the car with some juice, once you give it the bottle 12's are going to be easy, a nice 100 shot and you will be golden
 
G

Grunter

Founding Member
May 16, 2001
151
0
17
Ontario,Canada
Sep 16, 2005
#31
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #31
Quote TMOSS - OK, but did they test those combos with other intakes to see which one was best of the bunch? Would they use a custom ported intake? Propbably not on both counts. Will it work well - probably. Is it the best one for the job? - maybe.


I've seen quite a few different tests of the same combo - The GT40, Ported Cobra, Performer RPM and extrude hone stocker are all pretty good!

The extrude hone cobra looses a bit of torque down low, the GT40 surprisingly is pretty strong up to 5500rpm(hp & torque) where it shuts down. Most long runner intakes all share a problem of shuting down anywhere between 5000 - 5500 rpm.

The clear winner is the RPM11. Mind the performer rpm is within 1-2hp and about the same in torque all the way to 5500rpm where it surrenders to the RPM11.

If you have the cam to take you to 6000rpm such as the 266,274,282 the RPM11 helps your power average and works great with these cams. The 266 and 282 did excellent with the RPM11. With the 282 you need to modify your computer as it is still making power at the rev limiter(6250). The 266 seems hard to beat on the street because it makes a lot of torque(fat powerband!) and incinerates tires at will!!! I can't comment on TFS though I have no dynoed combinations with there stuff. Box intakes kill low end torque but seem to work well on larger blocks that can sacrifice torque or when used with superchargers.
 

CoupedUp

Banned
Aug 26, 2005
260
0
0
Gone Fishing
Sep 16, 2005
#32
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #32
Like stated above .. the chassis/wheels are holding you back on 12's, as well as a nice port on that GT40.

The RPMII is not going to help him down low at all and the 266 will shut down before it uses any of the top end this intake can supply ... that intake is really made for revvers and strokers.
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
0
16
Sep 16, 2005
#33
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #33
Have the GT-40 extrude honed in prep for the blower. Or u may want to go real big with a ported Victor EFI or TFS-R but only with the blower.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 16, 2005
#34
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #34
Grunter said:
The clear winner is the RPM11. Mind the performer rpm is within 1-2hp and about the same in torque all the way to 5500rpm where it surrenders to the RPM11.
Click to expand...

But, that is ENTIRELY case by case dependent - did you look at the link I posted above? RPMII was down 24lb-ft and 7HP peak numbers and the Explorer had higher TQ/HP through 5,300rpm and then hung it's trace directly on top of the RPMII trace through 6,000 rpm where the dyno stopped. The RPMII was a clear loser on that AFR headed combo no matter how you look at it.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 16, 2005
#35
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #35
304billet said:
Have the GT-40 extrude honed in prep for the blower.
Click to expand...

Buy a different intake before you sink $600-700 in an EH GT40 intake.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Engine Evap and charcoal cannister leak
  • ryan1994stang
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
416
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 18, 2026
Mcmahst
O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
325
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
TPony
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
229
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
57
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?