• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What Performance Flat Tappet Hydraulic Lifters are out There?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fasttback
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2006

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Jul 26, 2006
#1
  • Jul 26, 2006
  • #1
I have a new mild hydraulic cam but need to purchase lifters. The specs on the cam are:

Lift at valve: 0.480 I E (1.6 ratio)

Duration: 224 at 0.050

LC: 111

I’m interested in purchasing some performance or anti-pump lifters for this cam. From what I gathered these are some choices:

Rhodes
Comp Cams
Crane

I heard the Rhodes can sound like solid lifters (tap, tap, tap…). Don’t know anything about the others besides manufacture literature. Are there any pros and cons for these type lifters? Should I just consider standard hydraulic lifters with this cam profile?
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Jul 27, 2006
#2
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #2
Does anyone have opinions about standard hydraulic vs antipump lifters?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 28, 2006
#3
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #3
rhoads lifters are noisier than other hydraulic lifters, and some people like that, others dont. crane does have a set of lifters that work like the rhoads lifters, but are not as noisy. the drawback is that the crane lifters dont have the same rpm range the rhoads lifters do. personally with the cam i would just get a set of lifters from crane or comp cams and be done with it. the rhoads lifters are for cams that are larger than the one you selected.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jul 28, 2006
#4
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #4
I had a set of Rhoads back in the 80s with a Comp 280h cam, and it improved the idle greatly. I have heard negative things about durability, though. I actually liked the sound, and so did peiple at stoplights. Adjusting them is a little bit of a challenge. I don't know that I would recommend them.

I was on the phone with an Edelbrock exec about a year ago, and he said their mfg. for their performance lifters was getting out of the performance lifter biz, and that was why a number of cam packages were on BO. I believe Eaton was making them, and they were the only ones making them. Obviously they found a way to resolve it. Not sure how though...
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Jul 28, 2006
#5
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #5
Do not use the Rhoads lifters, or the Crane High Energy, with that cam!!! The only reason to use these "fast bleed" lifters is to provide vacuum at idle, so that you can operate power brakes with a high overlap cam. Yours is not a high overlap cam.

These fast bleed lifter make your engine sound like a sewing machine. The source of the sound is equally distasteful. It's the sound of your valves hitting the seats when the lifter collapses about halfway through the opening cycle. That's the design -- it shortens the duration and lift at low rpm. The effect goes away at higher rpm because the lifter can't collapse fast enough.

Most cam manufacturers use the same lifters, made by a New Zealand outfit called Pro Topline, and using the former HyLift/Johnson factories. The exceptions are cheap Chinese knockoffs, which I understand you would want to avoid, and Comp Cams label lifters, which they claim anyway to be superior.

My advice is to order 16 generic lifters from Summit. These are the same lifters as any cam grinder would have included in a cam/lifter/spring kit.

Also, if you're running your original 39-40 year old valve springs, you ought to get some new ones. A broken valve spring can ruin your whole day. Although you already own your new cam, others ought to consider buying the cam kit with springs included.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
For Sale Edelbrock Performer Ford cam and lifter set-429/460
  • My2001car
  • Dec 11, 2023
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
0
Views
880
Other Classifieds Dec 11, 2023
My2001car
M
427w Engine Build
  • LuckyM95
  • Nov 12, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
17K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 11, 2016
LuckyM95
What Do You Think Of This 347 Stroker Build
  • 94built5.0
  • Jun 19, 2013
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
18
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 21, 2013
94built5.0
C
  • Locked
Expired ** Crane Cam 5.0 HO ** 1/2 PRICE **$200**
  • chuzie
  • Dec 29, 2012
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
4
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Feb 7, 2013
chuzie
C
Custom 1969 Mustang (pics) - What Cam Should I Use?
  • tdmach1
  • Jun 14, 2012
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
4K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 29, 2012
bartl
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?