What power

[SMOKEDYA]

I know its been dscused a gazillon times....But whatch think of this combo?90 302 AFR 185 58cc heads stock cam and trick flow R intake 90mm accufab peace
















john

 

[Shaolin Crane]

Too many un-knowns

 

[FoxGT87]

225 to the wheels

 

[90lxcoupe]

That combo has not been discussed a gazzilion times, you should put it on the dyno so we can have some results. Seems to be alot of talk about these big headed 302s but no solid track or dyno numbers backing them

 

[Mintsick]

Why a stock cam?

 

[Shaolin Crane]

Why a stock cam?

why not?

 

[fivespeedsteed]

spend the measely 189 dollars on an e cam

 

[VibrantRedGT]

Doesn't Nik have a big headed combo on a 302? I don't think his has a stock cam but his runs pretty quick for a 302. Hard to put a number on that combo though. Probably in the 270 range I'd guess. An AFM cam or custom would put that over 300HP I would think. It's hurting without a cam.

 

[Shaolin Crane]

spend the measely 189 dollars on an e cam

Dont bother, re-degree to 112, run a 1.72 rocker and you'll get the same thing

 

[25thmustang]

for those saying why the stock cam, I like mine. My car will chug along at 1000 RPM, and doesn't rattle your teeth at a stop light. I like the feel, sound and performance of aftermarket cams as well, but the stocker isn't terrible.

AFR 185s leave a lot of room to make more power than that combo, so if theres a reason you can get them, I wouldn't say no, because of a stock cam.

I would also stick with a stock cam over a B or E cam... but thats just my opinion.

 

[NIKwoaC]

That combo has not been discussed a gazzilion times, you should put it on the dyno so we can have some results. Seems to be alot of talk about these big headed 302s but no solid track or dyno numbers backing them

Dammit, I know, I know. I've been meaning to get it on the dyno but life happens.

why not?

Why not not?

spend the measely 189 dollars on an e cam

Doesn't Nik have a big headed combo on a 302? I don't think his has a stock cam but his runs pretty quick for a 302.

Intake: 265 @ .006", 215 @ .050", .355" lobe .568" w/1.6 rocker
Exhaust: 276 @ .006", 224 @ .050", .353 lobe .565 w/1.6 rocker

On a 112 LSA

It's hurting without a cam.

Agreed.

 

[Shaolin Crane]

Nik sucks at reading

 

[VibrantRedGT]

Nik, get on a dyno and all the gazillion threads on this subject already.

 

[Noobz347]

Oh.... I thought this was a, "WHAT POWER!!!!11111oneone"

thread.

Instead it's a, "what power?" thread.

 

[FoxGT87]

Noobz your pictures r teh failz

 

[98gtvert]

Seems like too much heads for a stock cam. If you didnt do or had no plans to do anything different to the car the 165's would be a better choice imo.

 

[VibrantRedGT]

Go Pro Noobz!!

 

[Shaolin Crane]

Seems like too much heads for a stock cam. If you didnt do or had no plans to do anything different to the car the 165's would be a better choice imo.

There are plenty of dudes on c-c running 185's with a 302

 

[Noobz347]

fixt... damned non-referencing websites.

 

[NIKwoaC]

Seems like too much heads for a stock cam.

Care to elaborate on this?