• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What should I do for the engine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsquier91
  • Start date Start date May 16, 2011
J

jsquier91

New Member
May 16, 2011
5
0
0
May 16, 2011
#1
  • May 16, 2011
  • #1
Currently i am restoring my 71 mustang fastback, it has a 302 in it now which needs complete rebuild, but i found a 351 online for sale which was a great deal. My question is do you guys think i should rebuild and/or stroke my 302 to possibly a 331? or should i rebuild the 351 and/or stroke that to possibly a 383 or something. This will be a fun car to drive around in, not looking for a showpiece and winning trophies. Im only 19, and this is my first restoration so i need some advice. thanks everyone
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
May 16, 2011
#2
  • May 16, 2011
  • #2
Just how much fun you planning to have? You could easily and inexpensively build the 302 to over 300 hp.
 
G

gregski

Active Member
Mar 13, 2010
577
0
28
Sacramento, California
May 16, 2011
#3
  • May 16, 2011
  • #3
though both engines are from the same Windsor family, considered Ford small blocks, parts for the 351 are a bit more expensive and a bit more harder to find, though at some point in time the heads were very similar, the intake is wider on the 351, as well as the water pump, and it took different exhaust manifolds, if you are considering an upgrade to EFI sometime in the future, the 5.0 components would bolt right up to the 302 but not the 351, the 351 may end up a bit more torquier but you could get similar horse power out of both, now for the real monkey wrench, for the price of a full on rebuild, including machining to accept the stroker kits in either block (ie new crank and cam bearings), you could pick up a crate short block and call it a day

347 - short block $1695
 
J

jsquier91

New Member
May 16, 2011
5
0
0
May 16, 2011
#4
  • May 16, 2011
  • #4
Enough fun i guess? haha idk but im thinking the 351 because they cost about the same to rebuild them. and i found a deal for a 351 complete engine for $150. Now i am wondering will i need to do any cutting or anything to my engine bay for the 351 to fit? If it seems like it will be a mother @$@#$ to swap motors than i will most likely stick with the 302.
 
J

jsquier91

New Member
May 16, 2011
5
0
0
May 16, 2011
#5
  • May 16, 2011
  • #5
hmm thats even a possibility too, what website would you recommend to buy a crate motor from so i could check into that? im honestly up for some options and i would like to get the motor and tranny complete. and at least from there i can tinker with some other BS while i drive her around.
 
G

gregski

Active Member
Mar 13, 2010
577
0
28
Sacramento, California
May 16, 2011
#6
  • May 16, 2011
  • #6
jsquier91 said:
Now i am wondering will i need to do any cutting or anything to my engine bay for the 351 to fit?
Click to expand...
351 Cleveland motors were a factory option in 1971, (you may want to decipher your VIN to see if yours wasn't one of them to begin with originally, just a thought) not sure if there is a difference between the Cleveland and the Windows 351 in terms of engine mounting points. But room wise you should be golden.
 
J

jsquier91

New Member
May 16, 2011
5
0
0
May 16, 2011
#7
  • May 16, 2011
  • #7
i actually already decoded my vin and it was originally a 289 in it. and i thought it wouldnt be a problem with having the room of a 351, but with sroking the 302 i wouldn't want to put to much pressure on it with like a 347. the most i would go would be a 331 and for a 351 either a 383 or 393. so im really stuck between these.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
May 16, 2011
#8
  • May 16, 2011
  • #8
I do not believe a 289 in 1971. 302, yes, 351 W/C, 429 yes.

Keep in mind, that as you build the engine, you also need to modify the transmission, rear end gears and brakes/suspension to keep up.
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
May 16, 2011
#9
  • May 16, 2011
  • #9
As far as factory EFI on the 351W goes, yes it can. The Ford "5.8L EFI" engines in the early 90's were 351W's. True, they were mostly in trucks and vans, and many of them were speed-density systems; but the intakes were very much the same whether SD or Mass-Air. One instance that comes to mind is the '95 F150 that used to belong to my son-in-law (SVTCobra306 here, or SVTCobra347 on Mustang/Cobra/racing boards around the country). "The Grape Ape" ran Mass-Air on a 351W - factory.

If you believe that the truck upper intake will be too tall to fit under your hood, and you have the coin; Trick-Flow sells their "5.0 EFI" upper intakes in a package with a lower-half that is built for the 351W.

You can go for the 347; but know that you are pretty much at the upper limits of displacement for a factory 302/5.0 block. If you can find a 351W with very clean bores that won't need more than a quick run-through with a 4" dingle-ball hone; you get an engine stroked to 4 more cubes than a 347 practically for free. If you've got to go .030 over to clean the bores, bummer! You went 10 cubes more.
As somebody already said, your '71 has an engine bay that would fit a 351 Cleveland or Lima (429/460) engine.... how hard can a Windsor be???
 

72 fastback

Member
Apr 4, 2006
146
3
19
Hamden Ct
May 17, 2011
#10
  • May 17, 2011
  • #10
A 351w will fit in there with no problems. I haven't found long tube headers to fit with a 4spd yet but try-ys will work with slight modifications.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
May 17, 2011
#11
  • May 17, 2011
  • #11
jsquier91 said:
Enough fun i guess? haha idk but im thinking the 351 because they cost about the same to rebuild them. and i found a deal for a 351 complete engine for $150. Now i am wondering will i need to do any cutting or anything to my engine bay for the 351 to fit? If it seems like it will be a mother @$@#$ to swap motors than i will most likely stick with the 302.
Click to expand...

351? The 71-73 was designed to fit the 429, so a 460 will fit in there easily, with stone-stock parts. A 351 looks kinda lonely in there, and a 302 looks dinky.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
May 17, 2011
#12
  • May 17, 2011
  • #12
jsquier91 said:
Currently i am restoring my 71 mustang fastback, it has a 302 in it now which needs complete rebuild, but i found a 351 online for sale which was a great deal. My question is do you guys think i should rebuild and/or stroke my 302 to possibly a 331? or should i rebuild the 351 and/or stroke that to possibly a 383 or something. This will be a fun car to drive around in, not looking for a showpiece and winning trophies. Im only 19, and this is my first restoration so i need some advice. thanks everyone
Click to expand...

jsquier91 said:
i actually already decoded my vin and it was originally a 289 in it. and i thought it wouldnt be a problem with having the room of a 351, but with sroking the 302 i wouldn't want to put to much pressure on it with like a 347. the most i would go would be a 331 and for a 351 either a 383 or 393. so im really stuck between these.
Click to expand...

buy the 351 and build it as a 393. it will bolt in place of the 302 that is currently in the car with minor mods to the linkage and wiring.

as for your car originally having a 289 in it, not possible as 289 production ended in early 1968.
 
J

jsquier91

New Member
May 16, 2011
5
0
0
May 17, 2011
#13
  • May 17, 2011
  • #13
okay sorry for that than, thats what this one website said when i decoded it so oh well, but yes you are right the 302 looks very dinky in the engine bay and just doesnt feel right. so i think i will go with what you guys are saying and buy the 351. thanks everyone for your inputs.
 

horseballz

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2009
824
19
49
Las Vegas, NV
May 17, 2011
#14
  • May 17, 2011
  • #14
The biggest obstacle to the swap, although not really hard, will be brackets and pulleys which will be different for the 351W vs 302.
HTH,
Gene
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
616
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
319
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
383
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
What should I do
  • PvolkStang
  • May 21, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
278
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 22, 2025
WhiteCobra95
M
New member to Stang.Net
  • MI6Agent007
  • Apr 3, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
14
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Jul 5, 2025
91AOD5.0LX
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?