• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What size fuel line

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangdave
  • Start date Start date Sep 14, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Sep 14, 2005
#1
  • Sep 14, 2005
  • #1
I plan on switching to the factory 3/8" line to replace my 5/16" line but was wondering:
How much h.p. will each line support on a carb'd. car, mechanical pump, at 6 or 7 p.s.i.?
Anyone have a chart?
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Sep 14, 2005
#2
  • Sep 14, 2005
  • #2
Don't have a chart or anything, but I've been told the 3/8ths line is good to around 400-450hp depending on your pump.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 14, 2005
#3
  • Sep 14, 2005
  • #3
That sounds about right for crank horsepower!

My attitude is there is no reason to starve!
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Sep 14, 2005
#4
  • Sep 14, 2005
  • #4
I run 3/8 line....make 400 at the back tire with mechanical pump.
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Sep 14, 2005
#5
  • Sep 14, 2005
  • #5
So if you were to switch...where would you run the new line?

I ask, because I am thinking of replacing my line with braided steel hose, AN-6.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Sep 14, 2005
#6
  • Sep 14, 2005
  • #6
Why couldn't he just run it where the old line went? I plan on doing the same thing this winter. Do I need it...probably not but like jay said...why starve?
 
1

19simmons65

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
214
0
0
Upper Marlboro, MD
Sep 14, 2005
#7
  • Sep 14, 2005
  • #7
How difficult is it to run a fuel line?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Sep 15, 2005
#8
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #8
3/8" line will actually handle alot more than 400hp, closer to 600 or so as i recall. the only reason we ran 1/2" line on our fuel altered many years ago was because we were running alcohol and we needed the volume. we were making around 800hp.

as i recall 5/16" line will handle about 400hp before you start having starvation issues at the top end.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 15, 2005
#9
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #9
This is funny timing. We're finding out right now that my 3/8" hard line is not sufficient enough for my set up. I'm running a #8 braided front to back today! I intend to follow the hard line route! The #8 is 7/16 so this should get more fuel volume there. The biggest problem with the hard line that I can see is the decreasing radius bends.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Sep 15, 2005
#10
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #10
I plan on following the stock routing. I think steel line would be more resistant to damage on the street but I could be wrong. 3/8" will be plenty for my near stock setup or any mods I might make.
Mdjay, what kind of power are you pushing to need a bigger line? Is it f.i.?
 

monk302

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2001
742
2
16
New Jersey
Sep 15, 2005
#11
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #11
19simmons65 said:
How difficult is it to run a fuel line?
Click to expand...

It is not difficult at all. I bought a roll of twenty foot 3/8ths from Summit. I already had a pipe bender for doing my brake lines. My experience is that shape the line at the rear first going to the fuel tank and then move forward.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Sep 15, 2005
#12
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #12
mdjay said:
This is funny timing. We're finding out right now that my 3/8" hard line is not sufficient enough for my set up. I'm running a #8 braided front to back today! I intend to follow the hard line route! The #8 is 7/16 so this should get more fuel volume there. The biggest problem with the hard line that I can see is the decreasing radius bends.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you covered this, but more than one person has been caught running larger fuel lines and then NOT remembering to increase the 5/16 line right at the tank or the size of the lines at their fuel pump also
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Sep 15, 2005
#13
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #13
mdjay said:
This is funny timing. We're finding out right now that my 3/8" hard line is not sufficient enough for my set up. I'm running a #8 braided front to back today! I intend to follow the hard line route! The #8 is 7/16 so this should get more fuel volume there. The biggest problem with the hard line that I can see is the decreasing radius bends.
Click to expand...

So you used the driveline tunnel? What did you use to attach the tubing to the car? Didn't you bring it up over the rear of the engine (firewall) rather than out of the original location?
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Sep 15, 2005
#14
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #14
I've always heard conflicting answers to this question myself. The only reason for such divergent answers that I can think of would be the pressure. I have heard that 400fwhp is the limit for 5/16 and 550 or so for 3/8 on a line with 4-6 PSI (carbureator). The mechanical versus electric is not the issue it is line pressure.

I put a 1/2 inch aluminum hard-line with some -8AN fittings and 1/2 braided lines; all behind a 110gph mechanical pump at 6psi...just to be sure.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 15, 2005
#15
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #15
You can use frame clips or rubber insulated wiring loops.

My fuel pressure is much higher on mine. I'm using the carter provided by paxton which is 9lb at idle and it boosts references from there up to 12-14. The top end is where I'm having issues. Keep in mind this motor is no where near stock. 586 lift solid rolloer, big valves and lots of work on these aluminum heads. I'm still running the stock pulley on the paxton until I get all the bugs worked out. On the higher output motors, you definately need a vented gas cap at the least.

The other problem I ran into is if I have less than a 1/4 tank, the car pulls so hard that it moves the gas out of the way of the pick-up. Then I vapor lock!
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Sep 15, 2005
#16
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #16
mdjay said:
The other problem I ran into is if I have less than a 1/4 tank, the car pulls so hard that it moves the gas out of the way of the pick-up. Then I vapor lock!
Click to expand...


Have you looked at using a surge tank? This is the easiest and cheapeast option but running 2 pumps kinda sucks. The only other option to fix this is to modify the fuel tank by adding baffels or a sump in the center with a new pickup.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 15, 2005
#17
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #17
mustangdave said:
I plan on following the stock routing. I think steel line would be more resistant to damage on the street but I could be wrong. 3/8" will be plenty for my near stock setup or any mods I might make.
Mdjay, what kind of power are you pushing to need a bigger line? Is it f.i.?
Click to expand...

I agree with the 3/8 on a mild build. I have a SC 302 with everything roller and openned way up. Somewhere between 550-600 crank hp (never bench dynoed) with about 457 on the ground. I'm only getting about 5-7 lbs of boost. I waiting on getting the bugs out and adding miles before I change the pulley. Don't ask me why I'm considering changing the pulley to their 10 lb upgrade, the damn thing is already too fast. I think it's the 500 rwhp goal that is pushing me. Click the link on my sig to get more specifics...
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 15, 2005
#18
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #18
70_Nitrous_Eater said:
Have you looked at using a surge tank? This is the easiest and cheapeast option but running 2 pumps kinda sucks. The only other option to fix this is to modify the fuel tank by adding baffels or a sump in the center with a new pickup.
Click to expand...

I'm not that serious about racing this thing yet so it just makes me baby it if I get low on gas. That's a good thing. This car is more set up for the corners than a launch. Too stiff out back to squat. I just baby her first gear and let her rip in second gear.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Sep 15, 2005
#19
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #19
mdjay said:
I'm not that serious about racing this thing yet so it just makes me baby it if I get low on gas. That's a good thing. This car is more set up for the corners than a launch. Too stiff out back to squat. I just baby her first gear and let her rip in second gear.
Click to expand...


I would expect you to have the same sort of problems when cornering hard on a low tank.

It sounds like your still running a carb which probably helps. I know that alot of guys who convert their classics to EFI have the same problem. Carbs are much more forgiving when it comes to air in system.

If it does start to bother you, look into a surge tank. Easy and cheap to make.
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Sep 15, 2005
#20
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #20
dodgestang said:
I'm sure you covered this, but more than one person has been caught running larger fuel lines and then NOT remembering to increase the 5/16 line right at the tank or the size of the lines at their fuel pump also
Click to expand...

So how would you increase the size of the line at the tank?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
106
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Monday at 7:46 AM
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
43
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Wednesday at 2:59 AM
SchwarzStock
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
669
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
743
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
D
Fuel 1985 GT Fuel Line Diagram
  • DienstXIV
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 12, 2025
DienstXIV
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?